Welcome!

Hello, Titus Atomicus! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 23:27, 1 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Edward Fenton (disambiguation) edit

Hello, could you please stop edit warring on this page to add an invalid entry? As I put in my initial edit summary: 'removed entry with no links, see WP:DDD.' disambiguation pages are eseentially indexes of Wikipedia articles. If you think the book meets WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG, you could create an article on it, directly yourself, or with support through articles for creation. Then it would be a useful entry on the page. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 18:09, 16 October 2016 (UTC) Hello, I do not have really time (at the moment) to create a new entry. However it is sad the popular author does not have the entry in wiki. Does that mean he does not exist? Why? Because Amazon does not have his books in the offer? Instead of letting others to complete this entry you are acting as a bot just trashing it. What you are doing is ridiculous and detrimental. Titus Atomicus (talk) 20:27, 16 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Titus Atomicus. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

WP:NOTAFORUM edit

Article talk pages are not a place for you to discuss the subject of the article, they are for discussions about how the article can be improved. You comment was removed as a violation of WP:NOTAFORUM, restoring it was a violation of WP:BRD, and is the first step towards WP:Edit warring, which is not allowed. Please do not restore it again. Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:41, 1 June 2018 (UTC) That was my comment about improving the article. Do not be a vandal. Wikipedia is not your private enterprise. Titus Atomicus (talk) 18:46, 1 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

June 2018 edit

 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Talk:Bir Tawil. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 19:14, 1 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

In my opinion Beyond My Ken started this war. Not the first time. It seems he constantly removes versions which are different from his opinions. I would like to point out we were on the article's talk page not on the article page itself. Titus Atomicus (talk) 19:24, 1 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

So where is there an appropriate page to discuss article's talk pages and how to stop some of the editors' madness? Titus Atomicus (talk) 20:22, 1 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

auto-suspending edit

After years of contributing to wikipedia I came across a character who turned out to be an arogant moron and a vandal. Beyond My Ken whom I met in Halayb Triangle and Bir Tawil articles behaves in an inappropriate way. He thinks probably he is an owner of wikipedia. Anyway I do not have time and I am not in a mood to play his games. It is like flogging a dead horse. I am fed up.

Hereby I am suspending all my edition works.

Titus Atomicus (talk) 22:53, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Titus Atomicus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply