User talk:Titopao/Archive 5

Revert

Why did you revert his contributions? It didn't seem like vandalism or facruft. Moray An Par (talk) 08:55, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry I reverted your edits. If you have concerns regarding the authenticity of the dates or the chapters themselves, I believed it should have been discussed first. Moray An Par (talk) 09:19, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Sorry for having replied late. The edits look similar to those made by the various anon IPs (from at least two IPs, that is). My main concern was, well, with the lack of sources. I haven't added an appropriate user warning at the time, though. --- Tito Pao (talk) 06:39, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Jessie Castillo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jessie Castillo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessie Castillo (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Moray An Par (talk) 05:26, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mario O'Hara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Zamboanga

Young Critics Circle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cinema

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:30, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

Hi. When you recently edited Mario O'Hara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EDSA Revolution (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Young Critics Circle

The article Young Critics Circle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NOTFILM. No reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cresix (talk) 02:16, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Young Critics Circle for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Young Critics Circle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Critics Circle until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cresix (talk) 02:41, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Blackout

How are you choosing the recipients for your blackout notices? Ryan Vesey 02:47, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Through the category for Wikipedians in the Philippines. The recent posts, by the way, is a joint effort with Sky Harbor and a few other collaborators, we were planning this via email/private message. I haven't checked, though, if they have posted the blackout notices too, as I have been online through my laptop just today (I was previously checking their messages through my mobile phone). --- Tito Pao (talk) 02:55, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

That's too local. There should be an RfC tag and comments posted at the various village pumps. A larger RfC needs to be taken for any action to occur. Ryan Vesey 02:57, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip. Please leave a message on Sky Harbor's talk page too, as he's really the one in charge of this initiative. I'm just a water boy :) --- Tito Pao (talk) 03:07, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Tagalog help needed

Hello Titopao, I'm contacting you because we need some Tagalog translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on tl.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Tagalog Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 19:02, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Orlando Quevedo, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Filipino and Consistory (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Orlando Quevedo

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roldan Aquino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filipino (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jove Francisco may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• His name was mentioned by then-Rep. [[Gilbert Remulla]]) during the congressional investigation on the "Hello Garci" controversy.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:29, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest?

Are you really sure you know what that means? If yes, please explain how I inadvertently admitted to have conflict of interest.Unique Albay (talk) 03:08, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

You're insisting that you have the right to edit the pages in question, and that anyone else who reverts or edits your revisions is a vandal. Not to mention that you're "pure-blooded" and closely affiliated to the subject. Blake Gripling (talk) 03:11, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Again, I have not said such statement. I do not insist that no one except me can edit pages. Do not put words into the mouth of a mute! The two of you are harassing me for charging violations and actions that I have never done! Again, I ask you to cite the incidents of me cussing, name-calling, and edit-warring or I will report this matter to the arbitrators for harassment!Unique Albay (talk) 01:43, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

What do you call this then? "You are not competent enough to try to attempt to settle these issues. Your failure to show neutrality beyond doubts has not been resolved until now." Calling someone incompetent for what they tried to do in order to fix this mess reeks of ad hominem if you ask me. Blake Gripling (talk) 02:02, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

For such argument to be ad hominem, it must be irrelevant. Unique Albay (talk) 04:28, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Rollback

Hello, this is just to let you know that I've granted you Rollback rights. Just remember:

• Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
• Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
• Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
• Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
• Please read Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
• You can test Rollback at Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback
• You may wish to display the {{User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox and/or the {{Rollback}} top icon on your user page

If you have any questions, please do let me know.

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:31, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Seong-Jin Cho) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Seong-Jin Cho, Titopao!

Wikipedia editor MahuCG just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Add more but it's good for now

To reply, leave a comment on MahuCG's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thanks! Will try to get back to it during my lunchbreak, I'm off to work now. I decided to create the stub for now because the news is a bit recent (was announced just two hours ago), so I hope other editors will also be able to pick up from where I left it for now. Thanks again! --- Tito Pao (talk) 01:44, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Titopao. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Traditions of the University of Santo Tomas

Is there any way I can keep the article? The person who voted it for deletion argued about the lack of sources. But you want it deleted because it lacks popularity? Hmm. Should the argument be on the sources alone - whether the article satisfies the criteria or not? This is an honest question. Two of you wanted it deleted because of a different issue compared to the primary issue.

I am addressing the lack of primary sources. What I cant do anything about is that UST is not UP Ateneo or La Salle. I'm a Manileño and I never went to the articles you mentioned. And too, the fact that the article has 30 plus primary sources, arent they enough evidences that there are notable University Traditions other than the ones from UP Ateneo and DLSU?

I really think that as a Filipino editor, you should be helping me maintain the article. I could easily nominate the History of Ateneo de Manila and Culture and traditions of Ateneo de Manila, which have 33 and 8 sources respectively, for deletion. But I wont, because I believe, these articles warrant their own article, and can be better if edited thoroughly. Sana ganyan ka din mag isip. Just because the article is not UP-Ateneo-centric, you want to delete it? :(

I created the article, maybe 8 years ago, not thinking about whether or not UP and Ateneo have better and more popular traditions. I created the article because I want everyone to know the rich culture UST has. I want to record through wikipedia, so my fellow Thomasians would know what happened to UST in the previous years. Sana as a Filipino, even if you are not a Thomasian, help in preserving a Filipino related article. If you dont want it, just leave it. Hindi yung mag cocomment ka pa and want it deleted? :( Help, instead of nominating it for deletion

I just checked your profile and some articles you created. There is one article, for a person, whom I never heard of, that contains only 4 sources. You want to maintain that article, right? but you also want to delete an article with more than 60 sources just because its not from UP or Ateneo? Again, Please, help, instead of throwing a Philippine-related article. Pampi1010 (talk) 15:48, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Titopao. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Titopao. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

2019 US Banknote Contest

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Python Conference for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Python Conference is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Python Conference until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (help!) 23:39, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Hangad for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hangad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hangad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

The Banner talk 07:38, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Johnny Delgado for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Johnny Delgado, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Delgado until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mark Carpio

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mark Carpio, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:54, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mark Carpio

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mark Carpio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.bworldonline.com/editors-picks/2021/01/15/338920/with-move-to-viva-singer-mark-carpio-to-provide-movie-theme-songs/?amp. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:54, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)