This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tiramisoo (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i'm going to be watched like a hawk anyway, why "punish" me? just unblock me plz

Decline reason:

Administrative decline based on previous recent requests. Your requests to be unblocked have already been reviewed by two other editors in recent days. They both declined to unblock you. See User talk:HockeyLovingHoser. To shift to another one of your accounts and to request unblocking again is a type of forum shopping. (As was making the unblock request twice on consecutive days.) Please see the following from Wikipedia:GAB#Sockpuppetry_and_Checkuser-based_blocks: "If you actually are guilty of sockpuppetry, and want to get a second chance at editing, please do as follows: 1. Refrain from making any edits, using any account or anonymously, for a significant period of time. 2. Make the unblock request from your original account. Sockpuppeteers aren't often unblocked—since they've acted dishonestly, it's hard to believe them—but the administrators certainly aren't going to unblock the sockpuppet account." — Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:37, 27 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Hipsters

edit
 

Category:Hipsters, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 14:06, 16 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Songs from Donnie Darko

edit
 

Category:Songs from Donnie Darko, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)TCM22:43, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

"Late 00s recession" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Late 00s recession has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 1 § Late 00s recession until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 16:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply