TimeStandStill
edited under User:6ixtySe7en until I forgot my password, logged out and hadn't added my email address. I'm an idiot, I guess. unblank, but that's redundant. Oh, there's also something called a sockpuppet investigation going on at the moment so fair warning. I don't know what I did for that to happen but whatevs. PS I like this name better anyways. TimeStandStill (talk) 00:37, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
RfCU edit
All I did was forget my password, and changed my username, and it somehow qualified as abuse to a very small percentage of users. Someone said I was evading my primary account. This is not true, I left detailed responses on my talk page as seen above, and I also notified the accusing party and the Investigation itself that I had changed usernames and why I did so. TimeStandStill (talk) 02:11, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
TimeStandStill (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
reason: There seems to be no actual reason for this block, Bsadowski has not provided one, and there is no record of abuse here, no evasion because I put the new username at the Investigation for 6ixtySe7en, and notified it's creator. He may have misunderstood me though, the investigation I refer to above has not concluded.
Decline reason:
This account is blocked because of your previous account being suspected of sockpuppetry, and 'abuse of multiple accounts' is given as the reason for block. If you are cleared of this, this account will probably be unblocked and your 'password forgotten' one remain blocked as unnecessary. Peridon (talk) 12:25, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
TimeStandStill (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I couldn't possibly be this Illegal Operation guy. our edits overlap. I created this account (20:33[3]) at the same time he was editing Some printer thingy (20:34[4]). In the review below, the commenting admin admits I've been blocked because I am part of a case awaiting checkuser, which is not grounds for a block. If I got blocked just for being accused why is Illegal Operation still able to edit? -- TimeStandStill (talk) 14:35, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Magnonimous Amalthea 21:17, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
TimeStandStill (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I request to be unblocked in the interest of justice. The intangibility of the evidence makes it impossible to argue my case. First, There is no accessible record of a checkuser being done. There are no findings from the checkuser that I can show people to say I'm not this person, this magnonimous. Where are the measures to ensure that innocent editors do not get thrown under the bus when there is no measurable data. Maybe to some this sounds like sour grapes, but the meaning behind these words has logic, If any among you have the courage to look just close enough. You know, there is a conversation happening right now on Jimbo Wales talk page asking where all the good editors, where have they gone. I know where; half have gone out the door because someone thought they did something wrong, The other half (Cool Hand Luke for example) can barely stand watching as new blood gets bleached white by admins and angry people who don't like change. Can we really afford to surrender to the vandals, the warriors, and the spammers; Changing our outlook, sacrificing our dignity, for the appearance of security? Because if it stays this way, they, they've already won, they've turned wikipedia into the enemy they thought they were fighting. TimeStandStill (talk) 22:45, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Confirmed by CheckUser as a block-evading sock puppet of 6ixtySe7en (talk · contribs) as well as of other sock puppets of Magnonimous (talk · contribs). –MuZemike 22:53, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
TimeStandStill (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I did a stupid thing, and I won't do it again. I'm going to use this account only from now on. I just lost my password, and I can't log back in. but I've got this one written down now so It won't happen again. Thanks. TimeStandStill (talk) 17:27, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You'll need a much better explanation for your socking. Since you're still playing games, and since this is your fourth dishonest request, I've disabled your ability to edit this page with this account. Future requests must come from your master account (Magnonimous). Kuru (talk) 18:14, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.