Welcome to the wonderful world of Wikipedia.
Naturism edit
Unfortunately you chose to put your posing in the wrong place, so I should have deleted it- but I looked at it and placed it in the best spot in the article. The point you are trying to make is new- and conflicts with the research all previous researchers, so it certainly will need to be checked before it gets a permanent home in the article. The lead (first paragraph) is a synopsis of the entire article and does not contain facts that aren't discussed elsewhere.
Looking at your posting. It refers to research published in June 2009- ie research that hasn,t been published. The journal you quote is not one I have ever seen- so to verify the claim, I need to consult with editors who have got access to a copy which will not happen instantaneously. Googling- I see the source is genuine, but one needs a subscription to view the results. The methodology points out that this was a UK specific survey of 39 individuals taken from 5 different locations- indeed a small sample, Two of the locations could be said to contain some of the more extreme POV within the clothe free and naturist communities. I can't tell if it was representative with out a subscription. From the information I can glean it looks if, when it verified it will have a place somewhere in the article- but that will depend on the view of the community that is editing this page.
Looking for further information, this is your first post under this user name, you have not written anything about yourself on your user page so you are an unknown quantity. It is well written for a first post. If you look at the history of the Naturism page, you will see it was a stormy one- and much diligence is needed to ensure posts are acceptable both side of the Atlantic hindered by an extreme difference of terminology.
To ensure your information is accepted and correctly posted it would have been better if you had gone on the talk page to explain that research had been done, and asked advice on the best way to post it.