Tienouchou
|
Proposed deletion of François Asselineau
editI have removed the proposed deletion tag you placed on François Asselineau, as the article has undergone a deletion discussion three times and therefore cannot be deleted under the proposed deletion process. I only did this to comply with process; you are free to open another deletion discussion, but I highly recommend going over the deletion policy, WP:BEFORE, and the arguments raised in the previous deletion discussions and the deletion review (all of which are linked on the talk page) before doing so. Let me know if you have any questions. —KuyaBriBriTalk 18:12, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Battle of Aleppo (2012–13)
editTienouchou. please read WP:R Van WP:EW before making any further edits to the above mentioned WP page. Johnsy88 (talk) 10:24, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
- What you do is not appropriate Tienouchou (talk) 16:45, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
- Tienouchou When a user reverts an edit to a WP article citing "13:17, 12 November 2013 Tienouchou (talk | contribs) . . (226,959 bytes) (+212) . . (Undid revision 581309781 by Johnsy88 (talk) pro-regime propaganda)" this is a clear breach of the NPOV rule firstly and also potential move towards edit warring. I would suggest you read WP:POV, WP:WQT and WP:EW Johnsy88 (talk) 16:03, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
- No, you gave your point of view and HCPUNXKID explained why you acted badly. I ask you to stop this harassment. Tienouchou (talk) 11:56, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- Tienouchou When a user reverts an edit to a WP article citing "13:17, 12 November 2013 Tienouchou (talk | contribs) . . (226,959 bytes) (+212) . . (Undid revision 581309781 by Johnsy88 (talk) pro-regime propaganda)" this is a clear breach of the NPOV rule firstly and also potential move towards edit warring. I would suggest you read WP:POV, WP:WQT and WP:EW Johnsy88 (talk) 16:03, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
- What you do is not appropriate Tienouchou (talk) 16:45, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Wikilinking
editHi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia.
I noticed an article you worked on. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:
- dates
- years
- commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
- common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).
(This even applies to infoboxes.)
Thanks, and my best wishes.