Your submission at Articles for creation: AkinG Kalld Pedro (November 13) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anachronist was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
~Anachronist (talk) 20:41, 13 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: AkinG Kalld Pedro (November 14) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anachronist was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
~Anachronist (talk) 04:24, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft:AkinG Kalld Pedro concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:AkinG Kalld Pedro, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 15 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:AkinG Kalld Pedro edit

 

Hello, TickForTack. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "AkinG Kalld Pedro".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:23, 14 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:AkinG Kalld Pedro edit

 

Hello, TickForTack. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "AkinG Kalld Pedro".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Snowycats (talk) 08:19, 26 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Akinola Pedro edit

Hello, TickForTack,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Akinola Pedro, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 11:44, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply