Your submission at Articles for creation: Densify (September 13) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Whispering 03:24, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Densify, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Whispering 03:24, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

September 2017 edit

 

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ks0stm (TCGE)  If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply.  06:57, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • Globally renamed 'Densify' to 'Thusband73'. Another admin will review your unblock request. Just Chilling (talk) 21:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thusband73 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

Username has been updated to represent actual name. The original post is about an organization however intent is to contribute content over time to wikipedia on cloud Computing, infrastructure, AWS, vmware given subject matter expertise. Lots of changes at the moment in cloud computing

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. Superseded by new unblock request posted below. Please, do not make two unblock requests at a time. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:20, 18 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Thusband73 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Follow up to being unblocked. Username has been changed to represent myself. The original post is about an organization - new draft has been created which covers just the facts of the organisation. Longer term intent is to contribute content over time to wikipedia on cloud Computing, infrastructure, AWS, vmware given subject matter expertise. Lots of changes at the moment in cloud computing.

Accept reason:

Be sure to follow WP:COI. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:21, 18 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Densify edit

 

Hello, Thusband73. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Densify".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. — fortunavelut luna 03:02, 20 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Densify (October 24) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 18:07, 24 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Densify edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Densify, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 20:08, 23 March 2018 (UTC)Reply