User talk:Thryduulf/archive5

Financial export

I've connected Financial export to articles Economy of the United Kingdom, London, New York City, Bermuda, and the Cayman Islands. Are there any other suggestions you have for locations? I'm thinking the article might do better under 'Financial trade' so that it could include financial service import, as well as export, information.Nick Kerr 13:29, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

SVG railway maps

Incase you didn't notice, I replied to your question (plea?) on commons:Commons:Village_pump#SVG_artists_needed, and made Image:Wfm_sunderland_station.svg by way of illustration. If you're going to be producing more than a handful of similar diagrams, I can heartily recommend learning Inkscape to author them as SVGs. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 16:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

london railway stations

Thanks for your support for renaming the Waverley station article. I have now put a request for it to be renamed as you suggested.

Do you think that the London railway termini should also be renamed? e.g. Euston station to London Euston station etc. This is particularly important for Victoria station (London) as there are several "Victoria stations" worldwide. Our Phellap 22:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Helping the newbie out

Thanks for helping me out. =)

Andrea Shubert 02:28, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Re: Wikimedia UK meeting

Hi Chris, dunno if you sent me your message instead of David Gerard, or just called me David by mistake (!), but I said on the mailing list that I can't make any meeting before the Brum one or that one itself :-( - though I could make London the following week - have put this on Meta. Cormaggio ^@ 22:33, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Wikimedia UK

Thanks for your message - I've been relatively busy these past few days and hadn't caught up with things (apart from a couple of chats with James when I saw him on IRC). Look forward to seeing you soon, jguk 22:47, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Not intentional

As I explained in this edit, it was accidental. Would it be easier to delete the entire conversation in the neutral section, or leave it there? - Hbdragon88 23:57, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Articles For Deletion

Hi, a while ago you made some comments about the presence of bible-verse articles, and/or source texts of the bible, and you may therefore be interested in related new discussions:

• A discussion about 200 articles, one each for the first 200 verses of Matthew - Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/200 verses of Matthew
• A discussion about 18 articles, one each for the first 18 verses of John 20 - Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Verses of John 20
• A discussion about whether or not the entire text of a whole bible chapter should be contained in the 6 articles concerning those specific chapters - Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Whole bible chapter text.

--Victim of signature fascism | Don't forget to vote in the Wikipedia Arbitration Committee elections 18:23, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Adminship on Commons approved.

Hi! My adminship on commons is finally approved. Altough you have stated your objections about my request, I want you know that you can count on me if you need some help or if you have some doubt. Cheers!. --Joanot Martorell ✉ 10:03, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

Wikiproject anti-war, Article improvement drive

February 15, 2003 anti-war protest an article from the WikiProject Anti-war, which you are listed as a member of, has been nominated for the Article Improvement Drive (by me ).

It is an article about a day of much importance both to the history of the anti-war movement and to general discussion of the Iraq war. With a little work from experienced editors it could gain FA status. If you would like to see it improved please vote for it at Make "February 15, 2003 anti-war protest" the subject of an Article Improvement Drive--JK the unwise 13:14, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

GB railway stations

Hi. I’ve just posted a request for comments at Talk:Nottingham station regarding the “service information boxes” in GB railway station articles. I’m not sure who the first begetter of these boxes was, but as I noticed you are a frequent contributor on rail-related topics I thought you might care to take a look. --Picapica 22:40, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

Adminship

Thank you for your support, I'll let you know when I do accept. I promise I'll accept the nomination before February, so don't get worried!

Prodego ^talk 13:39, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

NoSeptember's RfA

Thank you, Thryduulf, for your support of my RfA. I will do my best in my new role and welcome your feedback. NoSeptember ^talk 16:50, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for reminder

Hello, thanks for the reminder about the Brum meet up, I only read it today, I was in Brum on Saturday night but not Friday... anyway, I hope it went well. All the best. Nick Boulevard 23:52, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you, Thryduulf/archive5
	for voting in my RFA. It failed with a result of 31/11/2. Thank you for voting anyway. If you have any comments, please say so here.

Thank you for voting!

Hello there! I wanted to thank you for taking the time to vote on my arbitration commitee nomination. Although it was not successful, I appreciate the time you spent to read my statement and questions and for then voting, either positively or negativly. Again, thank you! Páll ^{(Die pienk olifant)} 22:44, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you very much. And while I probably haven't interacted with you much, I definitely know your name well enough to not consider you a stranger. Guettarda 14:58, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

proposed policy

Hi, you recently commented on bible-verse articles, and may therefore be interested in commenting about a proposed policy covering roughly 50 specific verses:

• Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Verses of 1 Kings 4 and 5

--Victim of signature fascism 20:15, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Your watchlist archive

Hi, just FYI: I took the libery of fixing the Image: and Category: links on your watchlist archive (User:Thryduulf/watchlist20060127). Remember to add a leading colon (:) to such links, otherwise you display the images inline and add the page to the categories. This causes problems because that page probably doesn't belong in those categories, and many of the images where fair use, meaning they are not allowed on a user subpage. Please keep this in mind with future archivings. Thanks. --Sherool (talk) 20:57, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Parker vandalism

Greetings, Thryduulf!
Thanks for your suggestion on the Adminstrator's noticeboard re the troubles I've been having with James John Parker. I've been an administrator for some time, but this is the first time I've encountered repeated "vandalism" of this type--I put the word in quotes as I don't think it is in bad faith, just by someone who doesn't understand the rules of the road--and I've never had to protect an article. I've done as you suggested and "semi-protected" it. I'm grateful for your idea. PedanticallySpeaking 17:52, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

RFAr

Dmcdevit requested some links to evidence; I've added a few, please take a look at it. >Radiant< 02:43, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

My RFA

Hi Thryduulf/archive5, thanks for participating in my RfA discussion. Unfortunately, my fellow Wikipedians have decided at this time that I am not suitable to take on this additional responsibility, as the RfA failed with a result of 66/27/5 (71.0% support). I hope that if I do choose to reapply in the future, the effort I will make in the meantime to improve and expand my contributions to Wikipedia may persuade you to reconsider your position from neutral. All the best, Proto t c 10:55, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Amy Street

This article was not a hoax! Please could you re-instate it, do I need to find some eveidence to back this up? If so I shall

Thanks,

Fr_34

London trains

Well done! Just now for complete perfectness please make the tables of the same width. And also, I don't think there is a need to repeat TOC in every section. I agree it is helphul, but maybe every other or every third section? 'Cause now it is too cluttered for my liking. Renata 03:10, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Pedophilia

I meant to drop you a note about this, as you had expressed an interest in the project at WP:AN but I got caught up discussing the ArbCom case. This deletion is not a disguised censorship of the project, but a good faith (not necessarily correct, we'll see on WP:DRV) interpretation of user request; I will comment further on Deletion Review. I would not necessarily consider a new WikiProject Pedophilia written by the same or different authors to be recreation of deleted material, although such authors might like to consider alternatives such as creating the Project in Userspace or working with WikiProject Sex and Sexuality. I hope this clears things up a little, I'll go to WP:DRV to see what mistakes I'm supposed to have made ;) Physchim62 (talk) 18:35, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment at the deletion. I agree with Physchim62 that the project would likely have changed a bit in its nature if we had put it up for debate and outside input. If such a thing does come about, it will likely be in a more benign guise. I expected that, but Herostratus was a bit impulsive; however, he thought he has doing the right thing, and acted in good faith. We were just testing the water, trying to initiate a little discussion about the criticism in that department. But thank you for the comment and the defense; it was very bold of you. --DanielCD 21:20, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Gosh, aren't you popular! I've also come to express appreciation for your comments at this project's MfD. Well said.
brenneman^(t)(c) 22:14, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/KJV

Hello,

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/KJV. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/KJV/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/KJV/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, --Tony Sidaway 16:24, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

My RfA

Thank you Hello Thryduulf, and thank you for your support in my request for adminship! It passed with a final count of 63/4/3. I am honoured by the community support and pledge to serve the project as best as I can. CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 17:09, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Thank you

Hello Thryduulf, thank you for you support in my RfA. I was promoted with a final count of 48/1/0! If you see me making any mistakes, let me know ASAP. -- WB 02:40, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Department of Fun/Word Association

I don't know if you ever answer posts on your talk page, however I'm having a grand old time on the Word Association page. I'll have to think up something to stump you next time I post. TTFN. Whispering 21:17, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Damn you I was about to post that!Whispering 22:52, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

I'm thinking of reverting the page it looks like we got vadilized. Or its a newbie that doesn't know how the game works. Whispering 03:51, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Never mind I fixed it. Whispering 04:33, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

May I ask how you discovered the word association page? --HappyCamper 14:33, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Listing for cleanup

Hey I was wondering if you knew how to list a page for clean up? I was looking at a page and I know how to merge something and redirect but I don't know how to list it for cleanup. Whispering 21:23, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Erm...

Sorry to keep bugging you but you are a veritable font of knowledge. Anyway I was wondering if there was some sort of tutorial page for using userboxes. I keep trying but they keep getting screwed up. Whispering 04:12, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:DoverCastle-bailey-2004-10-03.jpg

Hi Thryduulf.

I edited a couple of image files a while ago and when I re-uploaded, because Wiki was very slow that day, the file history was lost. Anyway, I have a feeling that they may have been yours and was wondering if you could have a look, and if so, add the appropriate image tags (the images are flagged-as untagged ATM) I think they were originally GFDL and I'd add the tags myself, but obviously I'd rather not in case I'm mistaken.

• Image:DoverCastle-bailey-2004-10-03.jpg
• Image:DoverCastle-lighthouse-2004-10-03.jpg

If they're not yours then just ignore all this!

Regards, Ian Dunster 13:13, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

OK Chris - have just uploaded them both to Commons! - Regards, Ian Dunster 14:13, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Have just tried the image myself and it's the new version - Wiki is very slow today and it may be that you're getting a local, ie., cached on your PC, early version - try refreshing your browser window (F5 in IE - CTRL + R in Firefox) so that it fetches an updated copy. :) Ian Dunster 14:36, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

LOL! - done it myself plenty of times in the past! :) Ian Dunster 15:02, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Re:Happy Birthday

A belated thank you for the birthday message. You helped make my day. I didn't thank you before because I was busy working on three articles: Royal Decree of Graces of 1815, German immigration to Puerto Rico and French immigration to Puerto Rico. So, thank you once more, Cheers! Tony the Marine 19:49, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sandbox/Dead End

Point noted, but I don't think the rules were clear about sequential uninterrupted additions to a game. Rules modified to clarify the situation.

Nigosh 22:32, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Talk page formatting

Thank you for formating my talk page, but if you could get the two vertical templates to show to the right of the TOC and without the white background that would be perfect!

Sorry I couldn't give an ideal solution. Did you want z-index stacking or just no wrapping? I'm not sure that all browsers will support either or both. So you may solve it for just one browser... — RJH 21:16, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Smurrayinchester's RFA

Thank you, Thryduulf/archive5
	for voting in my RFA. It passed with a result of 100/1/0. Thanks for your vote! If you have any comments, please say so here.

Please help merge articles

In relation to the following arbitration case, which is nearing completion:

• SimonP and the King James Version

And in relation to the following completed centralised discussions:

• 200 verses of Matthew
• Verses of John 20
• Whole bible chapter text

Some assistance is requested, once the arbitration case is closed, in merging together the following articles

• Matthew 1, Matthew 1:1, Matthew 1:2, Matthew 1:3, Matthew 1:4, Matthew 1:5, Matthew 1:6, Matthew 1:7, Matthew 1:8, Matthew 1:9, Matthew 1:10, Matthew 1:11, Matthew 1:12, Matthew 1:13, Matthew 1:14, Matthew 1:15, Matthew 1:16, Matthew 1:17, Matthew 1:18, Matthew 1:19, Matthew 1:20, Matthew 1:21, Matthew 1:22, Matthew 1:23, Matthew 1:24, Matthew 1:25
• Matthew 2, Matthew 2:1, Matthew 2:2, Matthew 2:3, Matthew 2:4, Matthew 2:5, Matthew 2:6, Matthew 2:7, Matthew 2:8, Matthew 2:9, Matthew 2:10, Matthew 2:11, Matthew 2:12, Matthew 2:13, Matthew 2:14, Matthew 2:15, Matthew 2:16, Matthew 2:17, Matthew 2:18, Matthew 2:19, Matthew 2:20, Matthew 2:21, Matthew 2:22, Matthew 2:23,
• Matthew 3, Matthew 3:1, Matthew 3:2, Matthew 3:3, Matthew 3:4, Matthew 3:5, Matthew 3:6, Matthew 3:7, Matthew 3:8, Matthew 3:9, Matthew 3:10, Matthew 3:11, Matthew 3:12, Matthew 3:13, Matthew 3:14, Matthew 3:15, Matthew 3:16, Matthew 3:17
• Matthew 4, Matthew 4:1, Matthew 4:2, Matthew 4:3, Matthew 4:4, Matthew 4:5, Matthew 4:6, Matthew 4:7, Matthew 4:8, Matthew 4:9, Matthew 4:10, Matthew 4:11, Matthew 4:12, Matthew 4:13, Matthew 4:14, Matthew 4:15, Matthew 4:16, Matthew 4:17, Matthew 4:18, Matthew 4:19, Matthew 4:20, Matthew 4:21, Matthew 4:22, Matthew 4:23, Matthew 4:24, Matthew 4:25
• Matthew 5, Matthew 5:1, Matthew 5:2, Matthew 5:3, Matthew 5:4, Matthew 5:5 Matthew 5:6, Matthew 5:7, Matthew 5:8, Matthew 5:9, Matthew 5:10, Matthew 5:11, Matthew 5:12, Matthew 5:13, Matthew 5:14, Matthew 5:15, Matthew 5:16, Matthew 5:17, Matthew 5:18, Matthew 5:19, Matthew 5:20, Matthew 5:21, Matthew 5:22, Matthew 5:23-4, Matthew 5:25, Matthew 5:26, Matthew 5:27, Matthew 5:28, Matthew 5:29, Matthew 5:30, Matthew 5:31, Matthew 5:32, Matthew 5:33, Matthew 5:34, Matthew 5:35, Matthew 5:36, Matthew 5:37, Matthew 5:38, Matthew 5:39, Matthew 5:40, Matthew 5:42, Matthew 5:43, Matthew 5:44, Matthew 5:45, Matthew 5:46, Matthew 5:47, Matthew 5:48
• Matthew 6, Matthew 6:1, Matthew 6:2, Matthew 6:3, Matthew 6:4, Matthew 6:5, Matthew 6:6, Matthew 6:7, Matthew 6:8, Matthew 6:9, Matthew 6:10, Matthew 6:11, Matthew 6:12, Matthew 6:13, Matthew 6:14-5, Matthew 6:16, Matthew 6:17, Matthew 6:18, Matthew 6:19-20, Matthew 6:21, Matthew 6:22, Matthew 6:23, Matthew 6:24, Matthew 6:25, Matthew 6:26, Matthew 6:27, Matthew 6:28, Matthew 6:29, Matthew 6:30, Matthew 6:31, Matthew 6:32, Matthew 6:33, Matthew 6:34
• Matthew 7, Matthew 7:1, Matthew 7:2, Matthew 7:3, Matthew 7:4, Matthew 7:5, Matthew 7:6, Matthew 7:7, Matthew 7:8, Matthew 7:9, Matthew 7:10, Matthew 7:11, Matthew 7:12, Matthew 7:13, Matthew 7:14, Matthew 7:15
• John 20, John 20:1, John 20:2, John 20:3, John 20:4, John 20:5, John 20:6, John 20:7, John 20:8, John 20:9, John 20:10, John 20:11, John 20:12, John 20:13, John 20:14, John 20:15, John 20:16, John 20:17, John 20:18

And any other such articles that may currently exist

I have already prepared example merges of some of these articles

• Merge Example 1 is a merge of verse articles from Matthew 1:1 to Matthew 1:17 -> should be merged to Genealogy of Jesus
• Merge Example 2 is a merge of verse articles from Matthew 3:1 to Matthew 3:17 -> should be merged to Baptism of Jesus by John the Baptist (or similar title)

For titles check out List of New Testament stories (many are currently redlinks)

--Victim of signature fascism | There is no cabal 20:14, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Word Association

At what point does the Sandbox/Word Association become a clinical addiction for which one ought to seek help? Mazzy 11:00, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Also, I've just noticed that you work in Taunton. By odd coincidence, I was there yesterday attending an event at the cricket club. What a small, associative, world it is. Mazzy 11:25, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Errr...don't want to spook you, but I work in Bristol too! Be afraid, be very afraid. Maybe everyone around you is a Wikipedian too? No one actually works at all, they just live in a constant fog of associating/editing words? Mazzy 11:53, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Phew! No, you're in luck there. I work nearer the centre. So you don't have to spend the next five minutes trying to think of a good reason not to go to lunch with an Internet stalker! See you again sometime in the Word Association sandbox, tho Mazzy 11:59, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

ADDICT!  ;-) Mazzy 11:02, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

File:Wwaa.JPG

This user is addicted to Word association.

RFA

As you requested, I am informing you that I am now undergoing RFA.

Prodego ^talk 19:59, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

It's here!!!

Dear Thryduulf:

And it's here!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Announcing my CS 492 term-end paper: On Wikipedia — the Technology, the People, the Unfinished Work. File:Wikipedia.pdf

Thank you for all the kind help you have lent me during the paper-writing process!!!

Long live Wikipedia!!!

Shuo Xiang 22:22, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Of course :-)

I think Wikipedia will be as far from my mind as possible on my wedding night :-) And no, I won't be getting pictures for Commons... :P Thanks for your kind note on my talk page! - Ta bu shi da yu 12:46, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Word Association

I see you're as addicted as I am to the word association page. I'm becoming a little worried about this. It's taking up far too much of my working day... Phileas 02:23, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

That's pretty hardcore. I should mention, I just noticed that the confusion over the letter 'R' in the Radial Ultra Cross game could be my fault. Someone put a word in this space and I removed it because it wasn't attached to anything, but I forgot to remove the square brackets around it too, so it was still a link and looked like an entry. I didn't realise this until someone else put a word underneath it. I've put an entry in the 'R' section now. Phileas 03:17, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Re: Admin

:) Thanks for your praise. I have considered it but so far not thought of any actual benefit that being an admin here would bring. Probably the tool I most wish I had is the ability to see deleted edits, but I don't think that argument will win over regular RfA'ers. ;) And Commons is actually keeping me more-than-enough busy. Perhaps we should recruit en.wp admins over to Commons instead! pfctdayelise (translate?) 15:15, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar

Thanks! Mike1024 (t/c) 17:00, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your vote of confidence in my recent request for bureaucratship. Even though it didn't pass, I greatly appreciate your support and hope I will continue to have your respect. Thank you! Flcelloguy (A note?) 23:01, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

delete

I noticed you deleted the article of Elliott Frankl without a valid reason, (1)My count of the debate was 8 deletes (although a few deletes appear to be sockpuppets) and 5 of the 8 deletes were posted when the article was not complete against 8 keeps (2) all the information is accurate and most but not all shows a source (3) the only person that was attempting to say this information is false is pm_shef who is the son of Alan Shefman the candidate that is running against Frankl. pm_shef I am sure knows everything was true in the article but will do anything to get his fathers opponents deleted, he did the same thing with a few other articles.--Eyeonvaughan 02:51, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Neon HSTs

Just to let you know the first neon HST is out and about, Non Free Image, Non Free Image, Non Free Image. Enotayokel 11:18, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

RFA Thanks

Thank you for your support vote on my RFA. The final result was a successful request based on 111 support and 1 oppose. --CBDunkerson 12:46, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Lolicon

Hi Thryduulf. I'm not generally in the habit of replying to criticisms such as yours. However, I respect you enormously and would like to know more clearly how you came to your conclusions, in order that I might manage such a situation better in the future.

Why do you think my comment on Jimbo's talk page was self-righteous? I was brief, certainly, but I was attempting at all times to do my hardest to be calm, neutral and as non-imflammatory as possible. Secondly, with regard to the mailing list, I do realise that most people don't read the list. However, I find it easiest to form my ideas in a non-wiki form. Therefore I composed the email on the list, then made a link to the archive. I felt this was a good compromise, as it also avoided pasting the same text on multiple pages.

Once again, I apologise for taking rash administrative actions, and I apologise for questioning you like this.

Yours, Sam Korn ^(smoddy) 23:50, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

AfD Discussion

Thryduulf, I was just noticing you closed the AfD discussion listed here with a no-consensus. I just wanted to point out that the creator of these articles ApolloBoy himself suggested that they be merged. Thanks for your time.

C₃H₅N₃O₉2010 00:44, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your message. Have recently joined Wikipedia (as I'm sure you can tell) I have an interest in the railways, and as someone who lives in Somerset, I'm quite lucky to have a good railway near to me. I see you have edited a lot of the pages on railway subjects, so I'm pleased we have something in common :-) Chryma 10:58, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the Advice

I'm still learning on how to use Wikipedia. I will keep it in mind. I've only v recently joined. Simply south 21:12, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

User Dispute RfC

• Thanks for your tip on my talk page. I have created a User Dispute RfC regarding User:Eyeonvaughan's behaviour in accordance with Wikipedia's Dispute Resolution Process. It can be found here. pm_shef 04:08, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

So enterprising of you Pm_shef. I wonder where you get this drive to fight your father's fights.

I see you are following Bearcat's request of not being involved in Vaughan politics very closely. And how the admin user:Bearcat is enforcing that npov rule. It must be WikiHeaven. VaughanWatch 00:09, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Censorship

A watered-down version of the proposed policy against censorship is now open for voting. Will you kindly review the policy and make your opinions known? Thank you very much. Loom91 12:20, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Eyeonvaughan

For what it's worth, I didn't personally interpret that diff as CasanovaAlive actually accusing me and pm_shef of being the same person — I thought he was just addressing me by name at the beginning of his comment. Though I grant that it is a bit ambiguous in retrospect. Eyeonvaughan does frequently accuse me of being pm_shef's "administrative assistant" or some other dismissive epithet which implies an employee-type relationship, but I'm not personally aware of any time that he's explicitly accused us of being the same person. Bearcat 19:52, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

I referred to you as Pm_shef's administrative assistant, not eyeonvaughan. And it was less accusatory than it was humorous... VaughanWatch 23:59, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

I am seeing red

(or more precisely Scarlet!) Captain scarlet seems to think that railway station articles should be called "<name> Station". See user talk:Captain scarlet, user talk:RHaworth and this edit. Given the tone of his replies, I think we might have difficulty persuading him to change his mind. Personally I am prepared to humour him providing he does not start moving articles about live stations. What do you think? -- RHaworth 04:34, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

I suppose sarcasm would not be the way forward. I do not think, I know so, I've taken time to justify my position which is why I find yours totally unacceptable. I had thought of a compromise which involved not using railway but adding the suffix station without capitalised s (good enough no?), which has meant that I have not moved hundreds of articles and only restrained myself to closed stations which have been referred to as place railway station, but if continuing the humour on other members' talk pages is the forward I don't see it happening since each and every reply these past few days seems to ocncentrate more on lowering the tone than actual going forward. Captain scarlet 10:02, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Vitamin C entry

The rules, as stated in the Cold Fusion game above state that "Unless your word is in a straight line to the start word (i.e. it is in column D or row H) then it must be adjacent to two existing words." Your entry was adjacent only to "Vitamin", and was not on the main row. That is why it was deleted.JeffStickney 01:23, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

ProhibitOnions's RfA

Thank you, Thryduulf/archive5!
	...for voting in my RFA. It passed with a result of 58/2/0. If you have any comments, please let me know here.

And thanks for your kind comments. Glad to have the confidence of another admin. Regards, ProhibitOnions 22:23, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Categories for deletion nominations

I've been cleanup up the uncategorized categories list, and running across a lot of mistakes and duplicates. When I find that a category is a duplicate, I've been adding a link to the correct category inside the duplicate. That way, anyone who stumbles accross it by accident will know where to go. I also figured that anyone interested enough to vote on the CFD page would look at it and it's history. Since the proof is already there, I didn't go to the trouble this time. And usually I note in the nomination but it was a big batch and I was getting tired -- ProveIt ^(talk) 14:54, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

semi-protection of pm_shef

I've done the same to User:Theonlyedge as he was getting the same invalid sockpuppet tag. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 23:40, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. I wasn't thinking. Now their hitting the talk pages. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 23:54, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Please do not acuse me of vandaling pages, pm Shef and Theonlyedge are belived to be sockpuppets of each other, this is discussed when Theonluedge put the strlchik article up for deletion--69.156.150.188 23:58, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for CheckUser

Take a look at the Wikipedia:Requests for CheckUser#64.231.242.202 (talk • contribs) and 69.156.148.61 (talk • contribs). CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 04:03, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Class 171-cab.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Class 171-cab.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

-SCEhardT 05:37, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Template talk:UK Major Railway Stations

Hi, would you mind having a look at the proposal I've put at Template talk:UK Major Railway Stations? Since I put it there, discussions have gone quiet (what a contrast to the British TOCs template!), and I wanted to know what people thought about it. Thanks, RFBailey 10:25, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Get involved in social nudity naming convention debates!

Hi, I'd like to invite you to get involved in establishing consensus in discussions concerning naming conventions for social nudity topics.

Please join in this community discussion regarding the name of Portal:Clothes free.

Participate here: Portal_talk:Clothes_free#Votes

Please also join in the discussion about what to name an article dealing with social nudity. I believe the the latter term is a better term to use than naturism or nudism as it is more WP:NPOV and is in use currently. Formerly the article was titled Clothes free movement.

Participate here: Talk:Naturism#Move_to_Social_nudity

Cheers,

User:Dandelion (talk|contribs) 19:48, 15 April 2006 (UTC)