Thomasf2811

Nomination of Club Smith for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Club Smith, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Club Smith until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Astronaut (talk) 04:18, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Flux balance analysis

Thomas,

I responded to you comments at Flux balance analysis at the talk page. Have a read and comment as needed. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 00:19, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Malaria

Might I also suggest that the taxonomy of Anopheles and Plasmodium species pages may also be of some small use in the introduction to your PhD thesis. Possibly also some of the material at the family level of plasmodium. DrMicro (talk) 14:38, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wardley map

The article Wardley map has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

promotional, not sustained by anything academic; almost all public content is now AI-generated repeats; at least one reference, by Wardley, was clearly written as satire but is taken as literal here

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

I do not massively disagree with this. I am not sufficiently knowledgeable about Wardley maps to improve the page myself. I had hoped that the community of users, which has claimed to be large in the past, would do that. There has been more criticism of the page than constructive editing and the page remains quite poor and does not meet the quality standard I expect of Wikipedia. Thanks for your attention, Thomasf2811 (talk) 11:39, 13 July 2023 (UTC)