Thomasav
Removal of the "Response from Teal Swan section" as poorly referenced edit
Hi, Thomasav. I'm writing about your recent edits made on this page:
You have an account established in 2008 but you don't even know that Reddit and Youtube are not eligible for referencing. And the third source was spam. I had to remove it as it was also non-encyclopedic and non-relevant. I recommend you to get familiar with eligible and non-eligible sources for use on Wikipedia:
--2601:1C0:CB01:2660:C4D1:80C2:DA91:3DA9 (talk) 18:36, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Again, use of non-eligible sources. I consider it vandalism and violation of WP: BLP. If it is done once again, I will report your account on the Board of Appeals for administrator's actions. --2601:1C0:CB01:2660:C4D1:80C2:DA91:3DA9 (talk) 20:44, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
- I disagree with your analysis. Feel free to report me now. Thomasav (talk) 20:49, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
I've already done it - there is currently a discussion about your actions, so you can take part in discussion. We definitely need a second opinion here.
--2601:1C0:CB01:2660:C4D1:80C2:DA91:3DA9 (talk) 20:53, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions notification edit
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.