May 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm Eduardofeld. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Mount Merapi— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. E. Feld talk 17:54, 1 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mount Merapi, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:59, 1 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Please don't vandalise as you did at the above.

May 2015 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mount Merapi has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mount Merapi was changed by Thman321 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.915506 on 2015-05-11T18:33:15+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:33, 11 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mount Merapi with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 18:37, 11 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Dawnseeker2000 18:40, 11 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 11) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:02, 11 May 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Thman321, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:02, 11 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

May 2015 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Tiptoety talk 19:02, 11 May 2015 (UTC)Reply