Hi There. You appear to be making a lot of edits on the Hits Radio Network station pages. Please revert the edits that remove “independent local radio station” and revert edits that add wrong sister stations. Thanks. CCCC10 — Preceding unsigned comment added by CCCC10 (talkcontribs) 10:34, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Welcome message

edit

Hello, This is Drew, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

I also notice you're in my neck of the woods. You might like to add Category:Wikipedians in Tyne and Wear and {{User:UBX/Tyne Tees Television}} to your user page so we can make a mini community!

Again, welcome!  The JPStalk to me 18:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Granada Reports and regional news program pages

edit

I noticed it was you who removed the reference referring to Fred Talbot being suspended from Granada Reports because of a lack of a source and you've since moved him to the 'Former on air team' section. Can you please provide a reference to indicate that he no longer is connected with Granada Reports? A presenter on the actual program referred to him as a Granada Reports weather presenter just last week not as a former Granada Reports weather presenter so it looks like his employment hasn't been terminated even though he is not appearing on air until the outcome of the alleged criminal offences is known, so I don't see why he is listed in the former on air team even if he is currently on air. If you don't have a reference then I can correct it.

Also I've noticed you don't seem to like relief weather presenters being listed on any of the ITV regional news program pages. However, in the case of Jon Mitchell appearing on Tyne Tees/Border and Lucy Kite appearing on Granada their appearances on those respective regions are more frequent as some of the BBC 'hub' presenters appear on regions they are listed under e.g. Lucy Kite has appeared on more ITV Granada forecasts in the past month than the number of BBC North West forecasts Sara Blizzard has done. You seem to be a regular editor of both the BBC and ITV regional pages so I'm not sure why you've gone for one approach on the BBC pages and another on the ITV ones. 89.248.29.41 (talk) 14:53, 16 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for Image:2344.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:2344.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Auto Message

edit

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:05, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:NVBGg NickelodeonSplat logo.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:NVBGg NickelodeonSplat logo.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:12, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Images

edit

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to the Tyne Tees articles. Could I please draw your attention to the notices on the upload page, particularly "Do not upload images found on websites... They will be deleted." Thanks. The JPStalk to me 15:16, 11 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your message. Our image policies can be very complicated and confusing, so thanks for asking this question. I'll keep this as brief and plain as possible.
  1. Wikipedia is a free content encyclopedia. That means contributors (you and I) are donating our time and effort for no reward. It also means that what we produce can be freely reproduced by others. (You might have seen other sites with exact copies of our articles: this is OK, because we are a free content project).
  2. Images taken from websites/scanned from magazines/captured from screen are not free content. They haven't been donated so they can be reproduced. Thus, using unfree images is against our primary goal of creating a free encyclopedia.
  3. We can accept unfree images in cases when it would be impossible to create or obtain a free alternative. This would be under something known as 'fair use'. Images of living people, such as Image:Jonathon Morrell.jpg, would not count as fair use because a free alternative could be created. (An individual could be photographed at a public appearance, or an agent could be contacted to donate an image to be licensed as free, etc.)
I hope this helps. Unfortunately it may initially seem negative as the articles will be without photos for sometime. However, there is a much greater sense of achievement if you do manage to create a free alternative.
Feel free to give me a shout if you have any more queries. The JPStalk to me 15:33, 11 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

TT Newsroom

Have you noticed the amount of times the bland newsroom is featured since the move to Gateshead? Such a shame that we didn't get that much behind-the-scenes footage of the more interesting City Road studios. The JPStalk to me 17:49, 11 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Oh, by the way, you can sign your posts using four tildes ~~~~ or use the sig button in the toolbar of the edit window (it looks like some of a signature). The JPStalk to me 17:51, 11 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
edit

Thanks for uploading Image:North_1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Automomated message #2

edit

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:09, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:South_0.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:46, 15 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:2344.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:2344.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 01:53, 15 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:NVBGg NickelodeonSplat logo.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:NVBGg NickelodeonSplat logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:27, 1 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:NVBGg NickelodeonSplat logo.jpg)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:NVBGg NickelodeonSplat logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:22, 11 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

May 2008

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Kelly Crabtree has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. nancy (talk) 18:32, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Nancy's Reply

edit
Hello, This is Drew. You have new messages at Nancy's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Notability of Gregg Easteal

edit

A tag has been placed on Gregg Easteal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JohnCD (talk) 14:32, 24 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Kenny Toal

edit

An article that you have been involved in editing, Kenny Toal, has been listed for deletion. I have included in this nomination the article Pam Royle. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenny Toal. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? JohnCD (talk) 14:44, 24 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Notability of Kim Inglis

edit

A tag has been placed on Kim Inglis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JohnCD (talk) 14:56, 24 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Notability

edit

Please read the guideline on Notability (people). You are posting a number of biographies of people who do not seem to me to satisfy Wikipedia's requirements. Also, they all seem to work for the same television station: if you are connected with that station, you should read the guideline on conflict of interest. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 14:56, 24 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Deleting your own article

edit

The way to delete an article you wrote (as long as no one else has added to it) is to blank it and put {{db-author}} (two curly brackets each end) at the top. That means "author requests deletion" and the next admin who passes by will zap it. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 16:14, 24 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  • I had forgotten that Kenny Toal was listed at AfD, and one is not supposed to blank articles while an AfD debate is going on. My fault. So I have restored it, and will make a note at the AfD that you requested deletion. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 16:31, 24 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Pam Royle. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 18:04, 30 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

edit

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 07:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Pam Royle

edit

An article that you have been involved in editing, Pam Royle, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pam Royle. (What happened is that an admin, noticing that you had blanked Kenny Toal, deleted it; I consulted him whether the AfD could be converted but was advised it would be best to relist it. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:02, 1 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

GMTV Pictures

edit

Hi there Drew, Yes, of course I can! I'll upload them during this week when I have the time to capture them.
All the best! Zukeylukey (talk) 20:39, 1 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

The article was tagged because I didn't think it met Wikipedia's notability requirements, which are the way WP tries to keep itself an encyclopedia and not a sort of Facebook/business directory/advertising billboard. The standard required by Notability (people) includes:

"Actors, comedians, opinion makers, models, and television personalities:
  • Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television, stage performances, and other productions.
  • Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following.
  • Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment."

And just being a newsreader/reporter falls well short of that. Why those two? actual enforcement of the standard is pretty erratic, and is done mainly by an (unofficial) New Pages Patrol of editors looking at new articles as they come in (at considerably more than one a minute sometimes). Doing that, I saw (I think) Greg Esteal, looked at the author (you) and what else he was doing, and saw that you seemed to be inputting a lot of articles about newsreaders from the same station, so I tagged most of them and pointed you to WP:BIO and WP:COI. The Royle and Toal articles did cite a reference, but it was only a newspaper report of the incident of Toal being sick and Royle taking over, which didn't strike me as "substantial coverage in an independent source"; so I took those two to AfD.

You refer me to other journalist pages - everyone realises that many unsuitable articles get through, and the notability criteria get stretched to bursting point, but the presence of some non-notable bios is not a good reason for allowing more - see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. I am not sufficiently motivated to go on a witch-hunt for more, but I am following through the ones I picked up.

What happens now is that anyone can comment on the AfD, including you. (But comments will be given weight according to the arguments advanced - WP:ILIKEIT doesn't cut much ice.) In fact, I see people are adding to the article and it's possible there may not be a consensus to delete - the default is "keep." As I said, the notability criteria get stretched pretty far. Regards, 20:39, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Nickelodeon's UK Kids Choice Awards 2007 a different title by copying its content and pasting it into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is considered undesirable because it splits the page history which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:23, 21 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Ian Payne (journalist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Schuym1 (talk) 13:33, 21 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Nickelodeon Kids' Choice Awards UK

edit

A tag has been placed on Nickelodeon Kids' Choice Awards UK, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jordan Timmins (talk) 13:28, 23 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bs.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Bs.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:24, 26 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ac.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Ac.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:24, 26 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

November 2008

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from List of recurring and minor Coronation Street characters. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Thanks, Ainlina(box)? 13:18, 1 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Redirects from merges

edit

When you merge articles, please add {{R from merge}} on the redirect page. This protects the original page history from deletion, which I understand is significant under the GFDL.

Note that the above template has to be added at the end of the first line i.e. immediately after the redirect close brackets, as all other lines on the page are ignored (except categories). - Fayenatic (talk) 23:27, 7 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use Image:AndrewCastle.jpg

edit
 
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:AndrewCastle.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? -- Molotron 10:55, 17 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for Image:BenShephard&RichardArnold.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:BenShephard&RichardArnold.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:29, 2 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:GMTV2008.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading File:GMTV2008.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:10, 13 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Michelle Connor

edit

I saw you removed the section I put on explaining Kym Marsh's temporary departure, if this is the case that it isn't relevant why is there a section about it on Carla Connor's page? Alex250P (talk) 17:24, 15 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Well, your edit to Carla Connor was reverted so it looks like it's worth keeping it in there.Alex250P (talk) 16:51, 16 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Tara Mandal

edit

I just noticed that you removed this character from the List of recurring and minor Coronation Street characters because you thought she is a past character. She's in episodes again starting as soon as next week so not really a past character. Episode guide here.Raintheone (talk) 18:13, 19 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Norris

edit

Apologies for the incorrect vandalism accusation on the Norris Cole article; I saw info that I had added had disappeared, and undid the last revision without looking. Bradley0110 (talk) 20:40, 20 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Kg.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Kg.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:15, 21 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use Image:BenShephard.jpg

edit
 
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:BenShephard.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? mattbr 22:02, 26 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use Image:Kg.jpg

edit
 
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Kg.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? mattbr 22:04, 26 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:GMTV Today 2008.jpg)

edit
 

Thanks for uploading Image:GMTV Today 2008.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? mattbr 22:07, 26 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (File:GMTV2008.jpg)

edit

You've uploaded File:GMTV2008.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:51, 4 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Thanks for uploading File:NewsHour2006.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 18:30, 6 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Presentation (GMTV)

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Presentation (GMTV), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

articlecruft spinoff of GMTV

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ironholds (talk) 17:44, 7 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Presentation (GMTV)

edit

May I suggest working on it in a sandbox so when you post it you'll have something usable? That way this wont be a problem. Ironholds (talk) 17:47, 7 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Well yes, but then if I look at your talkpage I see a stream of deleted articles and images. Surely you should've worked this out by now. In any case I'm most likely going to put the article up for AfD unless it shapes up; it isn't really article-worthy content. Ironholds (talk) 17:51, 7 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:GMTV1993.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:GMTV1993.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 11 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:GMTV1999.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:GMTV1999.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 11 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:GMTV2001.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:GMTV2001.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 11 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:MGMT09.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:MGMT09.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:36, 11 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Saturday Night Takeaway

edit

Could you take a lot at your last edit of this article? The last sentence of the 5th paragraph seems unclear. Thanks. Mseliw (talk) 15:02, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Use of schedule in GMTV

edit

Hi there

I noticed that you added a schedule to the GMTV article. Sadly I had to revert this edit you made for the following reasons:

  • If you have taken a schedule from a website, they are copyrighted and the schedule could be in violation of copyright policy.
  • Under schedule 17 of the Broadcasting Act 1990, it is illegal under UK law to publish a schedule for BBC One, BBC Two, ITV1 (including all regions and GMTV) or Channel 4 without paying a royality to Broadcasting Dataservices (BDS). And I quote:

More information on this matter can be found here: Wikipedia talk:Copyright problems/Archive 8#Potential legal issue with UK Radio station schedules within articles.

Apologies for reverting your changes. Please refrain from adding schedules to articles in the future. Thank you. --tgheretford (talk) 20:58, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Philippa Tomson.JPG

edit

Hi Drew. I noticed you claim that this image is entirely your own work. I'm curious when people upload images of a professional standard, and in difficult circumstances (such as a private TV studio). Could you tell me how you could photograph this subject in this setting, and how I could verify that? The JPStalk to me 18:30, 7 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for clearing that up. The JPStalk to me 11:58, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (File:Meridian Tonight.JPG)

edit

You've uploaded File:Meridian Tonight.JPG, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:38, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Edit summaries

edit
 
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.
Drew, could you please start including edit summaries? Thanks. The JPStalk to me 16:35, 28 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for File:ITVLookaround.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading File:ITVLookaround.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:17, 25 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Edit summaries 2

edit
 
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

The JPStalk to me 19:13, 8 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

ITV reporters

edit

Saw your edit summary. I think what you mean is this: John Irvine links to a disambiguaton page, as there are many John Irvines. Pick the one you want: say it is John Irvine (journalist)

Format the link like this: [[John Irvine (journalist)|John Irvine]] which will give you John Irvine (ie the bit before the "pipe" character | is the page linked to, the bit afterward is what displays).

pablohablo. 22:32, 8 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

If they don't have a page you could either leave the link out
  • Hiram Q Cheeseburger III (journalist)

or link it anyway

the link then just shows in red until the article is created. Red links are a bit unsightly (especially within body text) but can be useful on a list like this to show you which articles are missing - whether they deserve an article depends of course on the usual criteria re notability etc. pablohablo. 20:30, 9 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:MGMT09 3.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:MGMT09 3.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:35, 6 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

London Tonight

edit

Hi Drew,

Just to let you know the following:

1. Stuart Thomas is still the Editor of London Tonight and will be until June before he moves to the BBC - don't know where you are getting the Neil name from? Neil Roberts did recently join London as a Programme Editor but not the Editor.

The interviews are currently taking place to find Stuart's replacement in June.

2. Chrissie hasn't left - she's still with us and isn't freelance.

Best,

George —Preceding unsigned comment added by MAGICMAN2008 (talkcontribs) 20:15, 21 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Kenny Toal

edit

Hi Drew,

According to Philippa Tomson in The Sunday Sun today, Kenny is leaving Tyne Tees & Border to become a broadcast journalism lecturer at Edinburgh University.[1]

Hope that explains the edit.

Thanks, Gareth —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hughpugh (talkcontribs) 20:09, 6 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:ITVLookaround2007.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:ITVLookaround2007.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:10, 13 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:ITV Meridian Tonight.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:ITV Meridian Tonight.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:17, 19 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:NewsHour2006.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:NewsHour2006.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:32, 11 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:MGMT 4 Toonattik.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:MGMT 4 Toonattik.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 11 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Image-GMTVwithLorraine2009.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Image-GMTVwithLorraine2009.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:44, 11 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:GMTVStudioFeb09.JPG

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:GMTVStudioFeb09.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:15, 17 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:GMTVStudioFeb09.JPG

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:GMTVStudioFeb09.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:39, 9 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

You are now a Reviewer

edit
 

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:59, 18 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

List of GMTV Presenters

edit

Why have you deleted all previous hosts off of the page, the members of the team who have appeared for the longest duration on the show aside from Lorraine Kelly and Penny Smith, are presenters who haven't left in 2010, so surely this information should remain on the page? I put them in a table, to make it tidier, and was planning when the show ends to then split the page into sections (Presenters, Kids, Weather etc) Tom Southwell (talk) 15:24, 30 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

ITV Weather

edit

In the regional section you listed Jo Blythe as Monday-Friday weather presenter and Fred Talbot as weekend presenter for the Granada region in an update you made a couple of months ago. As I watch Granada Reports on a daily basis I can assure you that Fred Talbot has been doing most weekday forecasts for 12 months now and that Jo Blythe does 2 or 4 days a week and if she does 4 days it includes Saturday and Sunday. Hstudent (talk) 15:39, 4 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

The article List of ITV Breakfast presenters and reporters has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No official information has actually been released regarding over half of the people on this page appearing on either of the shows. A press release is due to be released this Tuesday, however surely with both shows having their own show page Wiki's can't the team of each show be added to the show pages, if their's a verified source out their for them?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tom Southwell (talk) 23:55, 28 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

ITV News presenters

edit

Maybe it's just me but some people seem to be hellbent on ensuring a relief newscaster is named as a main one on the grounds of how many appearances they've made. One month, they'll elevate Nina Hossain and the next, they'll do the same to Charlene White. Is there any way we'll be able to stop such prevalent edits from being made apart from undoing? (I'm not the most clued up in protecting articles from unnecessary edits, unfortunately). Hughpugh (talk) 00:17, 1 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Edit summaries

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Daybreak. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Bob talk 12:51, 7 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of List of ITV Breakfast programmes

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of ITV Breakfast programmes, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 13:09, 23 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sacha Brooks

edit

Thank you for creating the article about Sacha Brooks. Unfortunately the references you supplied do not provide sufficient cover of the reliable kind required by WP:BIO. Not all the sources even mention the subject. To prevent the article being shortly proposed for deletion, please consider adding sources that assert notability. Thanks. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:17, 22 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. When you recently edited Capital London, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Classic FM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 28 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. When you recently edited Mark Wright (television personality), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Take Me Out (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 4 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. When you recently edited Capital North East, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Take Me Out (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 31 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. When you recently edited Key 103, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Webster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 7 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jenny Frost (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Chase
Meridian Tonight (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Abingdon

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 15 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. When you recently edited List of Lorraine presenters and reporters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 24 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. When you recently edited ITV News (weekend bulletins), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Austin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 9 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. When you recently edited The Wright Stuff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kaye Adams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 16 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. When you recently edited BBC Look North (Yorkshire and North Midlands), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inside Out (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 24 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:TheWestCountryTonight.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:TheWestCountryTonight.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:15, 3 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Daybreak (ITV) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Terrace
Meridian Tonight (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Geoff Clark

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:30, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Lorraine 2012 (TV series).jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Lorraine 2012 (TV series).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:04, 4 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Capital (radio network) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Classic FM
Chill (radio station) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Classic FM
Choice FM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Classic FM
Real Radio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Classic FM
The Arrow (radio) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Classic FM

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 17 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited BBC London News, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Look East (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:30, 24 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Midlands Today (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Inside Out
Philippa Tomson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Producer

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 31 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Real Radio (North East), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited London Tonight, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page STV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 8 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Central Tonight, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kate Fisher (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 22 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Real Radio (North East) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to On Air with Ryan Seacrest
Real Radio (Scotland) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to On Air with Ryan Seacrest
Real Radio (Wales) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to On Air with Ryan Seacrest
Real Radio North West (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to On Air with Ryan Seacrest

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 29 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Itvlookaround.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Itvlookaround.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 14 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:ITVCalendar.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:ITVCalendar.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 14 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:MeridianTonight.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:MeridianTonight.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:13, 14 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:NorthEastTonight.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:NorthEastTonight.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:13, 14 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:AngliaTonight.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:AngliaTonight.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:13, 14 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

ITV News at 6:30

edit

Hi Drew, I just wanted to leave a note on your page about the ITV News (evening programme) page. I didn't think it was necessary to move the page to that name. The voiceover in the programme still refers to the bulletin as the "ITV News at 6:30", and while the graphics, music and studio have been changed and redesigned, the basic branding remains the same as it has since November 2009. I hope you are alright with my reversion. I have no problem with the other page you renamed, ITV News (afternoon programme), because that bulletin is rarely referred to as "ITV News at 1:30". Hope this is OK with you! LBM | TALK TO ME 00:21, 17 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

ITV News

edit

No problem - just wanted to make sure you were OK with my edit to the 6:30 page! Thanks. - LBM | TALK TO ME 19:49, 17 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ITV News Tyne Tees, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ian Payne (journalist) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:47, 5 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

ITV Regional News

edit

Hi Drew. I'm just wondering why you have removed the tables from the "On Air Teams" sections of the ITV Regional News programme articles? I think they look better with the tables; more tidy.
GMc(talk?) 03:25, 28 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of GMTV presenters and reporters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tipping Point (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 5 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

July 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to ITV News Central may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "<>"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • 3 news service were approved - ''ITV News Central'' will become fully sub-regional once again.<ref>[ref>[http://media.ofcom.org.uk/2013/07/23/ofcom-sets-out-licence-terms-for-itv-stv-utv-and-channel-5/

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:57, 25 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to ITV News Meridian may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "<>"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • 3 news service were approved - ''ITV News Meridian'' will increase sub-regional output.<ref>[ref>[http://media.ofcom.org.uk/2013/07/23/ofcom-sets-out-licence-terms-for-itv-stv-utv-and-channel-5/

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:59, 25 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Calendar (TV programme) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "<>"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Channel 3 news service were approved - ''Calendar'' will become fully sub-regional once again.<ref>[ref>[http://media.ofcom.org.uk/2013/07/23/ofcom-sets-out-licence-terms-for-itv-stv-utv-and-channel-5/

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:07, 25 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

August 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to ITV News Cymru Wales may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *David Wood (''[[ITV News]]'' regions

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:38, 2 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Capital North East, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Barr (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:05, 12 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

March 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Smooth Glasgow may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *Chris Skinner Monday–Saturday evenings)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:56, 2 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 97.5 & 107.7 Smooth Radio may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *Chris Skinner Monday–Saturday evenings)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:04, 2 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Smooth Radio articles

edit

Hi Drew, thanks for moving them all. Not sure when the local services begin, as their website shows Simon Bates as breakfast presenter again this week. I've listed the Smooth Radio North East redirect for delete, so that can be moved too once an admin comes along. I'm planning to move the existing Smooth Radio to something like Smooth Radio (former) or Smooth Radio (2010) when the local stations take effect, so we can have a fresh article dealing with the new network. I've mentioned this on the talk page, so feel free to add your thoughts there. Thanks, Paul MacDermott (talk) 16:33, 2 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Good Morning Britain (2014)

edit

Just a small point but I've been tripping over your changes re: Good Morning Britain (2014). If you need to split an article like this again, it's more efficient to start the process in reverse order. i.e.:

  1. Create Good Morning Britain (2014) as a redirect to Good Morning Britain
  2. Update the articles that need to point to Good Morning Britain (2014) such as Sean Fletcher, Charlotte Hawkins, Susanna Reid, Ben Shephard
  3. Rewrite Good Morning Britain (2014) so it has real content and references
  4. Now rename Good Morning Britain as Good Morning Britain (1983), create Good Morning Britain as a dab page, etc.

I'm only bothering to point this out because I see you are active in broadcast media, so you may not have the boring process-optimization habits that are the despair of my family and friends! Happy editing - Pointillist (talk) 13:16, 3 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Good Morning Britain (2014), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Mirror (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 4 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

April 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Heart (radio network) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *[http://www.heart.co.uk/ Heart]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:30, 28 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Global Group stations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wirral (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 2 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

May 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Capital North West and Wales may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • '''Capital North West and Wales''' (formerly ('''Heart''') is a local [[Radio broadcasting|radio station]] owned and operated by [[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:04, 6 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heart (radio network), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Franchise (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 9 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Merge discussion for LBC

edit
 

An article that you have been involved in editing, LBC, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Khairul Islam 00:39, 3 June 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khairul Islam (talkcontribs)

June 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Smooth Radio may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • (The above are networked presenters who are based in London. Each FM station (East Midlands, Glasgow,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:05, 16 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ITV News London, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Good Morning Britain (TV programme). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 13 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

July 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to ITV News Calendar may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • bulletins for the two regions. The separate late night bulletins are also retained and <ref>[ref>[http://media.ofcom.org.uk/2013/07/23/ofcom-sets-out-licence-terms-for-itv-stv-utv-and-channel-5/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:30, 13 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ITV News: Wales at Six, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jonathan Hill. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 20 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bauer Radio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlisle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

ITV News Lookaround
added a link pointing to Ian Payne (journalist)
ITV News Tyne Tees
added a link pointing to Ian Payne (journalist)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

ITV News tables

edit

Hi there - just leaving a note to request you don't reinstate the complex and newscaster tables to ITV News articles. These are overly complicated, unnecessary and almost border on fancruft. The info is better presented in list form. LBM talk to me 17:14, 15 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ITV Weather, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sara Thornton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 27 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, This is Drew. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Faye Barker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Good Morning Britain (TV programme). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ITV Weekend News, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page News at Ten. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, This is Drew. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited GHR Hull, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hull (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 17 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, This is Drew. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited GHR West Midlands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Free Radio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 29 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Joseph Hayat

edit

Hello, as per RHaworth's suggestion I am reaching out over the proposed creation of 'Joseph Hayat'.

Please could it be created? Hopefully the most recent draft version should still be accessible for respected, established editors such as yourself? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TTWatcher (talkcontribs) 16:06, 23 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

CFM (radio station) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Radio City
Metro Radio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Radio City

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:36, 11 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of ITV News on air staff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Nicholson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:27, 26 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Why revert?

edit

Hi Drew

Why did you revert[1] BHGbot's edit[2] to Hits Radio?

You reverted 1 edit by BHGbot, and 5 edit edits by TomasPRMcDermott. Why did none of that series of 6 reverts include any edit summary explanation of why you reverted? See WP:REVERT, which says

In the edit summary or on the talk page, succinctly explain why the change you are reverting was a bad idea or why reverting it is a better idea

--BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:23, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hits Radio UK moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Hits Radio UK, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 19:42, 15 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Trying to submit this page? This is Drew (talk) 15:12, 16 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hits Radio UK (June 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 15:28, 16 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, This is Drew! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:28, 16 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hits Radio and Greatest Hits Radio

edit

Hello, This is Drew

I was wondering why it was that you Reverted my edit on the pages above. I moved the pages adding network at the end which as I stated when editing, the viewer of the page would think that it was the national station. But this comes up first. It isn't a matter of how complex it is or not I have seen with pages longer names and overcomplicated names. At the end of the day it is Wikipedia and people will want to see what they are looking at. As well as this there is a picture (on Hits Radio) that is of the Hits Radio Network logo. I won't make any changes until you can talk back.

Thanks, 345 trains — Preceding unsigned comment added by 345 trains (talkcontribs) 21:23, 15 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mary Nightingale, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Thursday Night Live and Eye Spy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Laura Tobin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 31 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ITV Tyne Tees & Border, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South of Scotland.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 14 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of ITV Weather on air staff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UTV.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 26 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jonathan Morrell for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jonathan Morrell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Morrell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Flip Format (talk) 11:10, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Greatest Hits Radio UK for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Greatest Hits Radio UK is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greatest Hits Radio UK until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Flip Format (talk) 12:42, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ITV News at Ten, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Brand.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

  1. ^ [3]