User talk:Thine Antique Pen/Archive 5
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Crisco 1492 in topic DYK for Acropora papillare
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
The Signpost: 29 July 2015
- News and notes: BARC de-adminship proposal; Wikimania recordings debate
- Recent research: Wikipedia and collective intelligence; how Wikipedia is tweeted
- In the media: Is Wikipedia a battleground in the culture wars?
- Featured content: Even mammoths get the Blues
- Traffic report: Namaste again, Reddit
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:00, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Perijá tapaculo
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Perijá tapaculo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 21:01, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 August 2015
- Op-ed: Je ne suis pas Google
- News and notes: VisualEditor, endowment, science, and news in brief
- WikiProject report: Meet the boilerplate makers
- Traffic report: Mrityorma amritam gamaya...
- Featured content: Maya, Michigan, Medici, Médée, and Moul n'ga
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:17, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
CCI
Hello User:Thine Antique Pen thanks for the interest you have taken to go through my work.I must say the my CCI complaint was in good faith but nonetheless I am sad and someway helpless. There were a couple of articles you mentioned that I can accept that they were copyrighted −because I was new on Wikipedia. There are others especially the ones labelled as closed paraphrasing that I only used the facts and figures from the said websites since I couldn't have done that one my own. Again I cited those pages where I took the information from. I must be getting something wrong when it comes to paraphrasing but the truth is I did not intentionally do that.I am however ready to help clean up the copyrighted contents on those pages but the truth of the matter is I do not know how to go about. Please let me know what I can do at this stage because I am really down with the turn of events. My only desire was to help build more content from Ghana and not to infringe copyright rules. Regards--Rberchie (talk) 11:24, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Hello Rberchie. Do not worry too much. Many people have problems with Wikipedia's copyright policies when they first start editing, but still become great editors later. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 20:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your response.--Rberchie (talk) 18:54, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Hello User:Thine Antique Pen please what is my status with respect to the CCI? Have investigations been completed?Have the article been cleaned?What can I do to help? Regards.--Rberchie (talk) 09:50, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hello Rberchie. CCI is a rather long process and it can take many years for an investigation to be completed and the articles be cleaned. The investigation regarding you has not yet been opened and is currently just a request for investigation. I would recommend reading this about what you could do to help. Thanks. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 09:57, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Perijá tapaculo
The article Perijá tapaculo you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Perijá tapaculo for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 17:01, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Congrats!♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:15, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Stub contest
I see you've made a fantastic start on it. Just noticed it. £50 wouldn't make it worthwhile so I won't bother, especially as you've practically already won it. I was considering making a proposal to WMUK for me to run a stub contest throughout the year with more handsome prizes.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:48, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks Doc! I would sign up to something like that lasting throughout the year as having more time would let me focus on other stuff like GAs. When I was looking into articles to expand I noticed your large-scale efforts (especially with Italian provinces!) last year. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 11:58, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Basically through the WMUK grant there's a maximum of £2000 available for a request. I was going to propose £2000 allocated for six contests throughout the year, or three or four contests with top prize money ideally nearer £200-250 in Amazon vouchers for top prize to attract more people. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:04, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- That sounds good - then people wouldn't need to wait a year for another contest. The more content that gets improved, the better. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 12:07, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- What would you prefer? Six contests, one every two months with a prize no more than £100 or three or four with top prize £250?♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:14, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- I'd say that three or four contests would attract more people in the long run due to the higher monetary incentives, whereas six contests could be seen as a bit excessive and repetitious (i.e. like the WikiProject drives that seem to be always going on) - but that could attract regular involvement. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 12:21, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- I'd definitely worry that six was too many..even four....not sure.....glad someone else is thinking of dangling carrots :) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:46, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- @Casliber: I think one every quarter would be OK, but you or I should be compensated too for the same spent running it I think.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:31, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- I'd definitely worry that six was too many..even four....not sure.....glad someone else is thinking of dangling carrots :) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:46, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- I'd say that three or four contests would attract more people in the long run due to the higher monetary incentives, whereas six contests could be seen as a bit excessive and repetitious (i.e. like the WikiProject drives that seem to be always going on) - but that could attract regular involvement. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 12:21, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- What would you prefer? Six contests, one every two months with a prize no more than £100 or three or four with top prize £250?♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:14, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- That sounds good - then people wouldn't need to wait a year for another contest. The more content that gets improved, the better. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 12:07, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Basically through the WMUK grant there's a maximum of £2000 available for a request. I was going to propose £2000 allocated for six contests throughout the year, or three or four contests with top prize money ideally nearer £200-250 in Amazon vouchers for top prize to attract more people. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:04, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Do you have ideas?
I just created Syllabical and Steganographical table. Do you have any ideas how I might be able to get an image of the title page? Already emailed Philadelphia Historical Society, Michigan State University, and New York Public Library = no luck yet. I live in Michigan. You can answer on your page.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 13:18, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- I'd recommend contacting people in New York who could potentially make an image of the title page for you. A large number of universities in the US seem to have a copy of a book, with some offering online copies to students, but I am unsure whether these may be scans or text-only. The National Library of Australia have a copy online (as well as the State Library of New South Wales here) available to library card holders, but the same applies. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 14:38, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 15:03, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Acropora abrolhosensis
 | On 14 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Acropora abrolhosensis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that acroporid coral species Acropora abrolhosensis, A. anthocercis, A. awi, A. batunai, A. caroliniana, A. dendrum, A. derawanensis, A. desalwii, A. donei, A. echinata, A. elegans, A. hemprichii, A. hoeksemai, A. horrida, A. indonesia, A. kimbeensis, A. kirstyae, A. kosurini, A. loisetteae, A. lokani, A. microclados, A. multiacuta, A. paniculata, A. papillare, A. pharaonis, A. plumosa, and A. polystoma are all classed as vulnerable? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Acropora abrolhosensis. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:01, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Acropora anthocercis
| | On 14 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Acropora anthocercis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that acroporid coral species Acropora abrolhosensis, A. anthocercis, A. awi, A. batunai, A. caroliniana, A. dendrum, A. derawanensis, A. desalwii, A. donei, A. echinata, A. elegans, A. hemprichii, A. hoeksemai, A. horrida, A. indonesia, A. kimbeensis, A. kirstyae, A. kosurini, A. loisetteae, A. lokani, A. microclados, A. multiacuta, A. paniculata, A. papillare, A. pharaonis, A. plumosa, and A. polystoma are all classed as vulnerable? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:01, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Acropora awi
| | On 14 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Acropora awi, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that acroporid coral species Acropora abrolhosensis, A. anthocercis, A. awi, A. batunai, A. caroliniana, A. dendrum, A. derawanensis, A. desalwii, A. donei, A. echinata, A. elegans, A. hemprichii, A. hoeksemai, A. horrida, A. indonesia, A. kimbeensis, A. kirstyae, A. kosurini, A. loisetteae, A. lokani, A. microclados, A. multiacuta, A. paniculata, A. papillare, A. pharaonis, A. plumosa, and A. polystoma are all classed as vulnerable? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:01, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Acropora batunai
| | On 14 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Acropora batunai, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that acroporid coral species Acropora abrolhosensis, A. anthocercis, A. awi, A. batunai, A. caroliniana, A. dendrum, A. derawanensis, A. desalwii, A. donei, A. echinata, A. elegans, A. hemprichii, A. hoeksemai, A. horrida, A. indonesia, A. kimbeensis, A. kirstyae, A. kosurini, A. loisetteae, A. lokani, A. microclados, A. multiacuta, A. paniculata, A. papillare, A. pharaonis, A. plumosa, and A. polystoma are all classed as vulnerable? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:01, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Acropora caroliniana
| | On 14 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Acropora caroliniana, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that acroporid coral species Acropora abrolhosensis, A. anthocercis, A. awi, A. batunai, A. caroliniana, A. dendrum, A. derawanensis, A. desalwii, A. donei, A. echinata, A. elegans, A. hemprichii, A. hoeksemai, A. horrida, A. indonesia, A. kimbeensis, A. kirstyae, A. kosurini, A. loisetteae, A. lokani, A. microclados, A. multiacuta, A. paniculata, A. papillare, A. pharaonis, A. plumosa, and A. polystoma are all classed as vulnerable? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:01, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Acropora dendrum
| | On 14 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Acropora dendrum, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that acroporid coral species Acropora abrolhosensis, A. anthocercis, A. awi, A. batunai, A. caroliniana, A. dendrum, A. derawanensis, A. desalwii, A. donei, A. echinata, A. elegans, A. hemprichii, A. hoeksemai, A. horrida, A. indonesia, A. kimbeensis, A. kirstyae, A. kosurini, A. loisetteae, A. lokani, A. microclados, A. multiacuta, A. paniculata, A. papillare, A. pharaonis, A. plumosa, and A. polystoma are all classed as vulnerable? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:01, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Acropora derawanensis
| | On 14 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Acropora derawanensis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that acroporid coral species Acropora abrolhosensis, A. anthocercis, A. awi, A. batunai, A. caroliniana, A. dendrum, A. derawanensis, A. desalwii, A. donei, A. echinata, A. elegans, A. hemprichii, A. hoeksemai, A. horrida, A. indonesia, A. kimbeensis, A. kirstyae, A. kosurini, A. loisetteae, A. lokani, A. microclados, A. multiacuta, A. paniculata, A. papillare, A. pharaonis, A. plumosa, and A. polystoma are all classed as vulnerable? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:01, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Acropora desalwii
| | On 14 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Acropora desalwii, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that acroporid coral species Acropora abrolhosensis, A. anthocercis, A. awi, A. batunai, A. caroliniana, A. dendrum, A. derawanensis, A. desalwii, A. donei, A. echinata, A. elegans, A. hemprichii, A. hoeksemai, A. horrida, A. indonesia, A. kimbeensis, A. kirstyae, A. kosurini, A. loisetteae, A. lokani, A. microclados, A. multiacuta, A. paniculata, A. papillare, A. pharaonis, A. plumosa, and A. polystoma are all classed as vulnerable? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:01, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Acropora donei
| | On 14 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Acropora donei, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that acroporid coral species Acropora abrolhosensis, A. anthocercis, A. awi, A. batunai, A. caroliniana, A. dendrum, A. derawanensis, A. desalwii, A. donei, A. echinata, A. elegans, A. hemprichii, A. hoeksemai, A. horrida, A. indonesia, A. kimbeensis, A. kirstyae, A. kosurini, A. loisetteae, A. lokani, A. microclados, A. multiacuta, A. paniculata, A. papillare, A. pharaonis, A. plumosa, and A. polystoma are all classed as vulnerable? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Acropora echinata
| | On 14 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Acropora echinata, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that acroporid coral species Acropora abrolhosensis, A. anthocercis, A. awi, A. batunai, A. caroliniana, A. dendrum, A. derawanensis, A. desalwii, A. donei, A. echinata, A. elegans, A. hemprichii, A. hoeksemai, A. horrida, A. indonesia, A. kimbeensis, A. kirstyae, A. kosurini, A. loisetteae, A. lokani, A. microclados, A. multiacuta, A. paniculata, A. papillare, A. pharaonis, A. plumosa, and A. polystoma are all classed as vulnerable? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Acropora elegans
| | On 14 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Acropora elegans, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that acroporid coral species Acropora abrolhosensis, A. anthocercis, A. awi, A. batunai, A. caroliniana, A. dendrum, A. derawanensis, A. desalwii, A. donei, A. echinata, A. elegans, A. hemprichii, A. hoeksemai, A. horrida, A. indonesia, A. kimbeensis, A. kirstyae, A. kosurini, A. loisetteae, A. lokani, A. microclados, A. multiacuta, A. paniculata, A. papillare, A. pharaonis, A. plumosa, and A. polystoma are all classed as vulnerable? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Acropora hemprichii
| | On 14 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Acropora hemprichii, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that acroporid coral species Acropora abrolhosensis, A. anthocercis, A. awi, A. batunai, A. caroliniana, A. dendrum, A. derawanensis, A. desalwii, A. donei, A. echinata, A. elegans, A. hemprichii, A. hoeksemai, A. horrida, A. indonesia, A. kimbeensis, A. kirstyae, A. kosurini, A. loisetteae, A. lokani, A. microclados, A. multiacuta, A. paniculata, A. papillare, A. pharaonis, A. plumosa, and A. polystoma are all classed as vulnerable? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Acropora hoeksemai
| | On 14 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Acropora hoeksemai, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that acroporid coral species Acropora abrolhosensis, A. anthocercis, A. awi, A. batunai, A. caroliniana, A. dendrum, A. derawanensis, A. desalwii, A. donei, A. echinata, A. elegans, A. hemprichii, A. hoeksemai, A. horrida, A. indonesia, A. kimbeensis, A. kirstyae, A. kosurini, A. loisetteae, A. lokani, A. microclados, A. multiacuta, A. paniculata, A. papillare, A. pharaonis, A. plumosa, and A. polystoma are all classed as vulnerable? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Acropora horrida
| | On 14 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Acropora horrida, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that acroporid coral species Acropora abrolhosensis, A. anthocercis, A. awi, A. batunai, A. caroliniana, A. dendrum, A. derawanensis, A. desalwii, A. donei, A. echinata, A. elegans, A. hemprichii, A. hoeksemai, A. horrida, A. indonesia, A. kimbeensis, A. kirstyae, A. kosurini, A. loisetteae, A. lokani, A. microclados, A. multiacuta, A. paniculata, A. papillare, A. pharaonis, A. plumosa, and A. polystoma are all classed as vulnerable? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Acropora indonesia
| | On 14 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Acropora indonesia, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that acroporid coral species Acropora abrolhosensis, A. anthocercis, A. awi, A. batunai, A. caroliniana, A. dendrum, A. derawanensis, A. desalwii, A. donei, A. echinata, A. elegans, A. hemprichii, A. hoeksemai, A. horrida, A. indonesia, A. kimbeensis, A. kirstyae, A. kosurini, A. loisetteae, A. lokani, A. microclados, A. multiacuta, A. paniculata, A. papillare, A. pharaonis, A. plumosa, and A. polystoma are all classed as vulnerable? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Acropora kimbeensis
| | On 14 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Acropora kimbeensis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that acroporid coral species Acropora abrolhosensis, A. anthocercis, A. awi, A. batunai, A. caroliniana, A. dendrum, A. derawanensis, A. desalwii, A. donei, A. echinata, A. elegans, A. hemprichii, A. hoeksemai, A. horrida, A. indonesia, A. kimbeensis, A. kirstyae, A. kosurini, A. loisetteae, A. lokani, A. microclados, A. multiacuta, A. paniculata, A. papillare, A. pharaonis, A. plumosa, and A. polystoma are all classed as vulnerable? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Acropora kirstyae
| | On 14 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Acropora kirstyae, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that acroporid coral species Acropora abrolhosensis, A. anthocercis, A. awi, A. batunai, A. caroliniana, A. dendrum, A. derawanensis, A. desalwii, A. donei, A. echinata, A. elegans, A. hemprichii, A. hoeksemai, A. horrida, A. indonesia, A. kimbeensis, A. kirstyae, A. kosurini, A. loisetteae, A. lokani, A. microclados, A. multiacuta, A. paniculata, A. papillare, A. pharaonis, A. plumosa, and A. polystoma are all classed as vulnerable? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Acropora kosurini
| | On 14 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Acropora kosurini, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that acroporid coral species Acropora abrolhosensis, A. anthocercis, A. awi, A. batunai, A. caroliniana, A. dendrum, A. derawanensis, A. desalwii, A. donei, A. echinata, A. elegans, A. hemprichii, A. hoeksemai, A. horrida, A. indonesia, A. kimbeensis, A. kirstyae, A. kosurini, A. loisetteae, A. lokani, A. microclados, A. multiacuta, A. paniculata, A. papillare, A. pharaonis, A. plumosa, and A. polystoma are all classed as vulnerable? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Acropora loisetteae
| | On 14 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Acropora loisetteae, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that acroporid coral species Acropora abrolhosensis, A. anthocercis, A. awi, A. batunai, A. caroliniana, A. dendrum, A. derawanensis, A. desalwii, A. donei, A. echinata, A. elegans, A. hemprichii, A. hoeksemai, A. horrida, A. indonesia, A. kimbeensis, A. kirstyae, A. kosurini, A. loisetteae, A. lokani, A. microclados, A. multiacuta, A. paniculata, A. papillare, A. pharaonis, A. plumosa, and A. polystoma are all classed as vulnerable? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Acropora lokani
| | On 14 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Acropora lokani, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that acroporid coral species Acropora abrolhosensis, A. anthocercis, A. awi, A. batunai, A. caroliniana, A. dendrum, A. derawanensis, A. desalwii, A. donei, A. echinata, A. elegans, A. hemprichii, A. hoeksemai, A. horrida, A. indonesia, A. kimbeensis, A. kirstyae, A. kosurini, A. loisetteae, A. lokani, A. microclados, A. multiacuta, A. paniculata, A. papillare, A. pharaonis, A. plumosa, and A. polystoma are all classed as vulnerable? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Acropora microclados
| | On 14 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Acropora microclados, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that acroporid coral species Acropora abrolhosensis, A. anthocercis, A. awi, A. batunai, A. caroliniana, A. dendrum, A. derawanensis, A. desalwii, A. donei, A. echinata, A. elegans, A. hemprichii, A. hoeksemai, A. horrida, A. indonesia, A. kimbeensis, A. kirstyae, A. kosurini, A. loisetteae, A. lokani, A. microclados, A. multiacuta, A. paniculata, A. papillare, A. pharaonis, A. plumosa, and A. polystoma are all classed as vulnerable? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Acropora multiacuta
| | On 14 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Acropora multiacuta, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that acroporid coral species Acropora abrolhosensis, A. anthocercis, A. awi, A. batunai, A. caroliniana, A. dendrum, A. derawanensis, A. desalwii, A. donei, A. echinata, A. elegans, A. hemprichii, A. hoeksemai, A. horrida, A. indonesia, A. kimbeensis, A. kirstyae, A. kosurini, A. loisetteae, A. lokani, A. microclados, A. multiacuta, A. paniculata, A. papillare, A. pharaonis, A. plumosa, and A. polystoma are all classed as vulnerable? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Acropora paniculata
| | On 14 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Acropora paniculata, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that acroporid coral species Acropora abrolhosensis, A. anthocercis, A. awi, A. batunai, A. caroliniana, A. dendrum, A. derawanensis, A. desalwii, A. donei, A. echinata, A. elegans, A. hemprichii, A. hoeksemai, A. horrida, A. indonesia, A. kimbeensis, A. kirstyae, A. kosurini, A. loisetteae, A. lokani, A. microclados, A. multiacuta, A. paniculata, A. papillare, A. pharaonis, A. plumosa, and A. polystoma are all classed as vulnerable? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Acropora papillare
| | On 14 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Acropora papillare, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that acroporid coral species Acropora abrolhosensis, A. anthocercis, A. awi, A. batunai, A. caroliniana, A. dendrum, A. derawanensis, A. desalwii, A. donei, A. echinata, A. elegans, A. hemprichii, A. hoeksemai, A. horrida, A. indonesia, A. kimbeensis, A. kirstyae, A. kosurini, A. loisetteae, A. lokani, A. microclados, A. multiacuta, A. paniculata, A. papillare, A. pharaonis, A. plumosa, and A. polystoma are all classed as vulnerable? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 14 August 2015 (UTC)