Thegreatgrabber
|
||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 6 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
|
|
|
ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
why was my edit incorrect? edit
On the article for Mass shootings in the United States you reverted my edit and your reason was: change to sourced statement; change does not appear to be supported by the source.
Would you be able to please explain how my edit was incorrect? The source references 49.18% white men commit public mass shootings. 18.03% more than the second highest demographic. 63.157.252.62 (talk) 02:42, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for reaching out! When reviewing the source attached to the statement I took note of the phrase "Public mass killers are a heterogeneous group and are frequently delineated into several subtypes. Public murderers are often stereotyped as middle-aged white men..."[1]. So on a cursory glance at the source, what you said ("a majority of the time tend to be committed by White, middle-aged men.") doesn't really seem to line up. Now, looking at the table I see that 49.18% is pretty close to half, but that's not a majority and really even if it were 51% I'd really be wary about calling that a majority; while it's technically true, it doesn't really represent a "majority" as most people would think about the term. It just really doesn't seem to be a good interpretation of the source material. Also, just because something is the biggest category out of multiple doesn't automatically make it the "majority". In this case, I would argue that since the highest category is less than 50%, there simply isn't a majority category at all.
- The original text also said that
The provided source mentions that the "white male" category does not seem to be disproportionate:"Public mass shootings of persons unrelated to the shooter, and for a reason not connected with a previous crime (the rarest but most publicized) are committed by men whose racial distribution closely matches that of the nation as a whole".
But with that said, I guess I haven't found a really clear statement about that in the source linked. I did however find something to back it up a little in another document that it links to, saying that "but that figure, too, wasn’t that far off from U.S. demographics"[2], so I'll go ahead and add it as a reference. I hope that explains my reasoning a little bit, and of course feel free to make your own changes as well."Despite the widespread perception that mass shooters are overwhelmingly white males, researchers have found that white men are not overrepresented among mass shooters. In other words, white men are no more likely than other male demographic to engage in a mass shooting."[1]
Thegreatgrabber (talk) contribs 03:51, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
References
- ^ a b "Who Are Mass Shooters? Mass Shooter Demographics".
- ^ Engber, Daniel. "What the white mass-shooter myth gets right and wrong about killers' demographics". Slate. The Slate Group. Retrieved 5 January 2022.
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)