The real mr mobster

Welcome!

Hello, The real mr mobster, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Apple M2 did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Introduction tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Introduction to referencing
• Help pages
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome.  10mmsocket (talk) 08:42, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your message. If you want only verifiable information, then the info on M1 and M2 GPU compute partitions should to be removed altogether. What is written there right now has no basis in reality whatsoever. The real mr mobster (talk) 10:10, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

WP:BURDEN - if you want to add stuff then fix it. However, if you also believe that information is incorrect then provide a good argument why it should be removed. You could try being bold WP:BOLD by doing this straight away, but then you'll likely be reverted by another editor - as I did when you added unreferenced information. So the best option would be to post on the article's talk page, e.g. Talk:Apple M2 and start a discussion on your thoughts/proposal. See WP:BRD for an explanation of the bold/be-reverted/discuss cycle. 10mmsocket (talk) 10:21, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

One further thing, personal knowledge is classed as original research WP:OR and is not allowed. Also, the truth counts for absolutely nothing if it can't be verified WP:NOTTRUTH / WP:V. 10mmsocket (talk) 10:22, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! What is the usual procedure if one wants to remove currently published content that was arbitrary and unverified to begin with? I mean, I cannot prove that it is incorrect, because no authoritative source exists (the company does not release the technical information). I understand that my expert knowledge is not worth anything in this context (and I agree with that), but we have the unfortunate situation where unverified information (which I know to be incorrect) has already been published and stays up because of "seniority". The real mr mobster (talk) 10:28, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Like I say - WP:BRD. If you think it's justified then do it and give a good edit summary. If someone reverts you don't get into an edit war, instead create a discussion on the talk page. We need more bold/assertive editors - just not aggressive. Good luck and thank for engaging. 10mmsocket (talk) 10:33, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for taking your time to explain the protocols to me! Best The real mr mobster (talk) 10:38, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

I'm not that person, but there are people around who love to mentor new editors. See Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user/Adoptee's Area 10mmsocket (talk) 10:40, 4 July 2023 (UTC)