The lone bard
A barnstar for you! edit
|
The Original Barnstar |
| I'm the best The Lone Bard (talk) 17:21, 5 January 2012 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you! edit
|
The Teamwork Barnstar |
| For working alone. The Lone Bard (talk) 17:22, 5 January 2012 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you! edit
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
| For quitting wikipedia editing because the other users are too bias. The Lone Bard (talk) 17:23, 5 January 2012 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you! edit
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| For doing vandalism to teach others about it. The Lone Bard (talk) 17:23, 5 January 2012 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you! edit
|
The Special Barnstar |
| Autism The Lone Bard (talk) 17:24, 5 January 2012 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you! edit
|
|
The Double-Special Barnstar |
| "Everything is about sexism" -- The Wikipedia motto The Lone Bard (talk) 17:24, 5 January 2012 (UTC) |
February 2015 edit
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.Strongjam (talk) 14:25, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
TLDR. "We wont want the truth on Wikipedia we just want our own agenda" The Lone Bard (talk) 14:26, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- If you'd like to suggest edits based on reliable sources feel free to suggest them on the talk pages. Cheers — Strongjam (talk) 14:29, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- I wont because the reliable source system is flawed and favors only those third party sources which support your own bias. Its not so much overt collusion as just apathetic social justice through cronyism and omission of truth. The Lone Bard (talk) 15:06, 24 February 2015 (UTC) Furthermore, you leave the burden of proof on me but you have no unbias or scientific proof that Gamergate is as you say about "sexism" The Lone Bard (talk) 15:15, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- Heron, Michael James; Belford, Pauline; Goker, Ayse (2014). "Sexism in the circuitry". ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society. 44 (4). Association for Computing Machinery: 18–29. doi:10.1145/2695577.2695582. ISSN 0095-2737. — Strongjam (talk) 15:22, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- lol. 0.015% of messages contained "sexist" language. Thats great proof. Thanks bud. You're the best joke since Richard Pryor's Mudbone The Lone Bard (talk) 18:07, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
- Heron, Michael James; Belford, Pauline; Goker, Ayse (2014). "Sexism in the circuitry". ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society. 44 (4). Association for Computing Machinery: 18–29. doi:10.1145/2695577.2695582. ISSN 0095-2737. — Strongjam (talk) 15:22, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- I wont because the reliable source system is flawed and favors only those third party sources which support your own bias. Its not so much overt collusion as just apathetic social justice through cronyism and omission of truth. The Lone Bard (talk) 15:06, 24 February 2015 (UTC) Furthermore, you leave the burden of proof on me but you have no unbias or scientific proof that Gamergate is as you say about "sexism" The Lone Bard (talk) 15:15, 24 February 2015 (UTC)