The haul

May 2023

Hello The haul. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Ankit Kumar Pandey, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:The haul. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=The haul|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Please also review WP:COI as well. Ravensfire (talk) 14:58, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Can you please provide lock discloser tmplate for article if I'm not paid The haul (talk) 15:39, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

I cannot make any sense of what you've written. Are you trying to use a translation website to communicate? Ravensfire (talk) 20:39, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023: Draft:Ankit Kumar Pandey

Please do not remove citation-needed templates from the article or re-add unsourced material. All significant facts, and especially personal details in biographies of living persons need to be backed-up by independent, published, secondary reliable sources. Wikilinks are not citations. Thanks, Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 18:01, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

I would not remove any of citation needed templates The haul (talk) 18:57, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Now take a look Hindustan (newspaper) in hindi mentioned about his graduation. The haul (talk) 19:05, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Here you "Removed not mandatory citation". Actually, you removed two "citation needed" templates about a BLP date of birth:

• Edit difference

Here you "Added Citation". Actually, you removed an "Unreferenced section" template:

• Edit difference

This is not the way to get the draft submission approved. The article would possibly have passed review if you'd left it at the pruned revision I made earlier. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 19:10, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

I don't see a reference/citation beside details of his graduation. In fact, I don't see any references at all in the personal life section. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 19:12, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Hindustan (newspaper) in hindu mentioned about his graduation that he did graduation in btech in personal life section see The haul (talk) 19:19, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Okay, so now that one fact is referenced. Date of borth is not referenced, nor are any other details in the personal life section. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 19:21, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Yes I'll searching for more sources as per your guidance please don't get hyper i knew you are here last 17 year obviously your experience is unexpected, thanks for your time. The haul (talk) 19:24, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

I'll try to stay calm, though I have spent most of today answering G20norms‎'s questions, and we were so close to being able to submit the draft (albeit in a truncated form). Don't go about this backwards, though: you should find sources and write text that reflects what those sources actually say, not write what you want to write and then try to find sources that back this up. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 19:34, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Is imdb is reliable source for citation The haul (talk) 19:36, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

For Biography of living persons personal life? The haul (talk) 19:38, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

No, see WP:IMDB (it's user-generated). Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 19:43, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Okay The haul (talk) 19:48, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ankit Kumar Pandey (June 15)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DreamRimmer was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: The article has been deleted four times due to lack of notability. He did not perform any significant tasks that would have demonstrated his value. Fit India Ambassador is not a particularly noteworthy position due to its eligibility requirements, and all of the sources they provide are sponsored.

DreamRimmer (talk) 12:43, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello, The haul! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DreamRimmer (talk) 12:43, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ankit Kumar Pandey

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Ankit Kumar Pandey, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DreamRimmer (talk) 12:45, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, The haul. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Ankit Kumar Pandey, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:28, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Ankit Kumar Pandey has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ankit Kumar Pandey. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:04, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Draft:Ankit Kumar Pandey, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:The haul, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=The haul|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:19, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

I'm not paid but recently i read about coi so yes i can consider as coi for this topic. Please help me out to conflict of interest. The haul (talk) 17:52, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

What is the nature of your conflict of interest? 331dot (talk) 19:05, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

I know him from an camp self-defense after that I'll introduce myself as writer. The haul (talk) 19:41, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Draft:Ankit Kumar Pandey, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 20:52, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Paid editing again!

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 17:33, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Ankit Kumar Pandey has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ankit Kumar Pandey. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 09:01, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Moving

Hi, why did you move this draft Draft:Ankit Kumar Pandey (Sports Administrator)? Firstly, it doesn't matter what title drafts have, until they are published (and give that this has been rejected, it won't be published, and therefore the title matters even less). Secondly, the title you moved it to is actually incorrect. So what was the rationale here? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:12, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

The user page COI declaration has also vanished, perhaps because the article name is now outdated. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 17:19, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ankit Kumar Pandey (Sports Administrator)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ankit Kumar Pandey (Sports Administrator) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 18:04, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

ANI discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:08, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The haul (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The Haul i thought wikipedia is for all but few of the editors are doing there thing according to there rules and regulations if someone is wrong as a editors or administrator they have to support them not made decisions directly like they run wikipedia platform just because of they spent years they gonna made decision to block someone i know by mistake we made some mistakes on format and alls i had lots of examples to present my article was enough good then that published articles only things is that i didn't knew how to fully protect our article for any others editors so i can edit or write an article day by day to improve it, All some editors try on that topic Ankit Kumar Pandey they did mistakes and not follow wikipedia sources guidelines so it's not my mistake that they marked me as sockpuppet I'm doin only my articles with perfect sources which reliable in wikipedia guidelines unblock me it's not your personal platform. The haul (talk) 18:33, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Incomprehensible unblock request; however, Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 21:14, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.