May 2021

edit

Hi The divider846, Please do not add or change content, as you did at Simmy and Ami Faku without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and before editing.

If you have any question, leave your comment here

Colanao Khod (talk) Colanao Khod (talk) 14:09, 3 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Okay i'm sorry for changing the contents The divider846 (talk) 12:35, 11 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Legacy (South African TV series). Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 20:23, 11 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Lunathi Mampofu

edit
 

The article Lunathi Mampofu has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mvqr (talk) 11:47, 16 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bayabuza

edit
 

The article Bayabuza has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of any notability found

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:35, 17 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sources

edit

Hi The divider846, Thank you for your contributions. However I noticed most, if not all of your article creations are unsourced. You need to cite reliable sources them. You can go through Referencing for beginners and also WP:RS. Xclusivzik (talk) 16:11, 17 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Kokovha (Makhadzi Album) moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Kokovha (Makhadzi Album), is not suitable as written to remain published. It would appear you published it a bit too early, and you seem new to Wikipedia. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 08:03, 18 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Thumeka

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Thumeka requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 10mmsocket (talk) 08:26, 18 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

African Queen (Makhadzi Album) moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, African Queen (Makhadzi Album), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lennart97 (talk) 15:45, 18 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Mpumi Mzobe moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Mpumi Mzobe, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 10:49, 19 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Imizamo Yami

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Imizamo Yami requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Already exists in draft space. Disruptive/inexperienced editor created this over the top of the draft article. Although the draft has slightly more content, neither has enough to establish notability at this point.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 10mmsocket (talk) 10:57, 19 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation

edit
 

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The divider846, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

10mmsocket (talk) 11:00, 19 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:The King349 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The King349. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Girth Summit (blether) 16:10, 19 December 2021 (UTC)Reply