Welcome!

edit
 
Some cookies to welcome you!  

Welcome to Wikipedia, The Rage Conspiracy! I am Madhero88 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

MaenK.A.Talk 17:32, 24 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your new redirect

edit

Hi, I'm Kay. I've just seen your new redirect on special:NewPages and fixed it. When you make a redirect, the code is #REDIRECT [[pagename]] , so you almost got it right. Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better! SS(Kay) 08:36, 26 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome and thank you Kay :) The Rage Conspiracy (talk) 20:54, 26 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

East Tilbury Copper Wire Theft 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, East Tilbury Copper Wire Theft 2010, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:13, 26 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion of "Internet trickery"

edit
 

A page you created, Internet trickery, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 21:45, 26 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry case

edit
 

Your name has been in mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dr Roots for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Soap 22:37, 26 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Sockpuppetry. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. FASTILY (TALK) 03:16, 27 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Rage Conspiracy (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I didn't even use that Dr Huggies account at all, it was my brother who obviously would use my IP and that account didn't do anything inappropriate anyway. If anything, I would learn more from a tempoary block. The Rage Conspiracy (talk) 08:44, 27 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Rage Conspiracy (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Yes. My parents have found out about his many internet hooliganisms and have banned him from going on any website which reads IP addresses (pretty much all of them). If that was me who made Mr Huggles or whatever it was then I wouldn't be writing this. The Rage Conspiracy (talk) 18:15, 27 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You'd be surprised at the actions of blocked users. In any case, declined - the reason we do not accept little-brother requests is because they are impossible to distinguish from "good cop/bad cop" accounts, both behaviorally and technically. —Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 05:25, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Rage Conspiracy (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am sorry for all of the sockpuppetry and vandalism. I have cleaned up my act and I want to make a fresh start with no more vandalism or socking. I wish to improve what is already on the encyclopedia and make it a better place for everyone. The Rage Conspiracy (talk) 20:58, 1 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Even if we followed WP:OFFER you would need to be gone, and not even edit from an IP for at least 6 months (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 21:30, 1 June 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.