RFC proposal

Hello. I read the discussion about Physics Essays over at WP:FTN. Then I read the recent discussions on that talk page. Then I noticed some back and forth editing on the article itself. I think an RFC would be helpful at this point. I am wondering what are the relevant issues to be asked in the RFC. Do you have an idea how best the write the RFC? It seems there is more than one issue so I am sort of at a loss. Maybe we can collaborate and come with a tenable opening for an RFC. Also, the reason I am here asking this is because you suggested, on the noticeboard, opening up a discussion for wider participation than, for example, the eight editors who participated in the AfD. Regards ---Steve Quinn (talk) 03:56, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

That seems to be under discussion now on the noticeboard and the talk page of the essay. TFD (talk) 15:07, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Yeah, I just noticed these are taking place. Thanks. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 18:32, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

"Why not just say that despite no evidence, it's what you believe?"

Another misleading statement? It seems like you are taking this personally, and you really shouldn't. DN (talk) 05:29, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

[1] Since you are essentially accusing me of WP:OR on an article talk page, and have continuously ignored my requests to avoid making misleading statements I plan on taking this to DRN. Cheers. DN (talk) 21:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
[2] Posted. Cheers. DN (talk) 03:26, 24 July 2023 (UTC)