User talk:The Four Deuces/Archives/2022/June
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:The Four Deuces. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Would you consider becoming a New Page Reviewer?
 | |||
Hi The Four Deuces, I've recently been looking for editors to invite to join the new page reviewing team, and after reviewing your editing history, I think you would be a good candidate. Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; the new page reviewing team needs help from experienced users like yourself. Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, most pages are easy to review, and habits are quick to develop). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us. If you choose to apply, you can drop an application over at WP:PERM/NPR. If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message on my talk page or at the reviewer's discussion board. Cheers, and hope to see you around, (t · c) buidhe 22:18, 2 June 2022 (UTC) |
buidhe, thanks, I shall have a look at it. TFD (talk) 02:35, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Thomas Jefferson Talk Page
I want to apologize if I have come off as frustrated or aggressive. It was not intentional. I had been going at that discussion for days, feeling more and more like I wasn't being "heard." I let it get to me, and I feel like that came out in my comments. My apologies if it did. See you "out there." Anwegmann (talk) 02:21, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Friendly reminder
 | This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the Uyghur genocide. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
Should I make an RfC?
Hello! Thanks for your input on the discussion here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#drugs.com_for_MEDRS
I was wondering if I should make an RfC for this on that page? Or is it possible/preferable to convert the existing discussion into an RfC?
Sorry, I'm new so I figured I would ask for help on that. Since it does seem like drugs.com is used for biomedical claims on many different pages.
Thanks 50.45.170.185 (talk) 19:21, 30 June 2022 (UTC)