User talk:The Four Deuces/Archives/2021/May

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2601:46:C801:B1F0:ADA1:DB59:BFCA:6D52 in topic Strategic Intelligence Assessment and Data on Domestic Terrorism


A kitten for you!

 

hello

23winandym (talk) 17:27, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Antifa Dispute.

Hey to stop the back and forth I created a dispute resolution here. [1] 3Kingdoms (talk) 19:30, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Strategic Intelligence Assessment and Data on Domestic Terrorism

https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/fbi-dhs-domestic-terrorism-strategic-report.pdf/view

Starting on page 29 is a list of FBI Designated Significant Terrorism Incidents fr 2015-2019. Not only is Hodgekinson obviously on the list but the still labeled work place shooting at Ft Hood is on the list along with a few others missing from the left wing terrorism page which still appears as if left wing terrorism all but ended.


And fwiw cabal is not an anti semitic trope-when in doubt consult the ADL-whom do not consider it as such

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:46:c801:b1f0:5113:f20a:ffb:99aa (talkcontribs) 20:01, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Just because the ADL has not listed a term as a trope, does not mean it is not a trope. You don't seem to understand that a trope is not a term that always has bigoted connotations but takes on connotations depending on context. So while talking about Corbyn's insiders may not be a trope, it becomes a trope in the context of talking about "globalists and bankers." Bigots use these terms because it gives them plausible deniability. They can say for example that a British MP used the term and he's not a bigot. They are able to convey to other anti-Semites that they are talking about Jews without actually mentioning them directly.
Don't know why you want me to read a report from a police department. Best to stick to reliable secondary sources since articles are supposed to be based on them.
Also, can you please sign your posts. I have better things to do than to sign them for you.
TFD (talk) 21:05, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Of course I understand that. That page is a hyper partisan disaster. There are obviously huge similarities between critical social theory and critical race theory. That page mentions race once in passing. "Critical race theory is a practice. It's an approach to grappling with a history of White supremacy that rejects the belief that what's in the past is in the past, and that the laws and systems that grow from that past are detached from it," Critical race theorists believe that racism is an everyday experience for most people of color, and that a large part of society has no interest in doing away with it because it benefits White elites.

Many also believe that American institutions are racist and that people are privileged or oppressed because of their race. https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/01/us/critical-race-theory-explainer-trnd/index.html

Critical theory (also capitalized as Critical Theory)[1] is a Marxist approach to social philosophy that focuses on reflective assessment and critique of society and culture in order to reveal and challenge power structures. With origins in sociology and literary criticism, it argues that social problems are influenced and created more by societal structures and cultural assumptions than by individual and psychological factors. Maintaining that ideology is the principal obstacle to human liberation,[2]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_theory

They both further to go on to argue peoples fates are dependent on societal biases.

Almost identical or anyone calling critical race theory culturally Marxist would be right on the money anyone calling it cultural Marxism is a bigot! Thank you for your time.2601:46:C801:B1F0:ADA1:DB59:BFCA:6D52 (talk) 05:33, 21 May 2021 (UTC)