User talk:The Four Deuces/Archives/2019/November
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Edit conflict?
Hey, TFD. I see you replied to IP 99.203.29.17 at Talk:Ilhan Omar after (?) I had already removed its post because the IP is obviously the same person as the already blocked and extremely abusive 99.203.142.213. As you can see, our timestamps are the same, but mine is listed as the first in the history. Not sure what you'd like to do about your reply. If you want to restore the post you replied to, I have no great objection, since that post wasn't as abusive. I'd just as soon not give that person an outlet on Wikipedia, though. Regards, Bishonen | talk 10:49, 21 November 2019 (UTC).
- PS, I see they created an account, how charming. Making legal threats was actually the least of the problems; most of the nasty edits were blocked by the edit filter. Bishonen | talk 20:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC).
Help with a recent entry on a BLP
Hi there, I've always been so impressed with your knowledge of political matters, good intellect and just plain good common sense that I'm wondering if you would take a look at the Racial views of Donald Trump article talk where I just moved an article from the main page to the talk page for discussion. I know what this editor was getting at and I agree but IMO the entry reads like an essay rather than an encyclopedia entry for a BLP. If you are interested, please see what you think. Thanks. Gandydancer (talk) 16:58, 30 November 2019 (UTC)