User talk:The Four Deuces/Archives/2017/May
Latest comment: 7 years ago by TransporterMan in topic Request for mediation rejected
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
RSN and NPOVN threads
TFD, please look at WP:FORUMSHOP. In two instances you are taking the talk page discussions to the Notice Boards while the basic discussion is underway. In the case of the NPOVN we had just started the discussion. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 00:14, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Please avoid personal attacks. These are actually two different issues, what weight to give criticism of the SPLC by a controversial blogger and whether we should accept a description of an advertisement which is clearly false. I am surprised by the way on your position on this. You know that weight requires when explaining opinions we should mention their degree of support. Your edit on the FRC falsely presents the opinions of the blogger as mainstream. Furthermore, it is disingenuous to ignore what an ad actually says. I am sure that you would not have accepted that type of evidence in your courtroom. TFD (talk) 00:50, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Request for mediation rejected
The request for formal mediation concerning Talk:Nigel Farage, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 21:08, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)