User talk:The Four Deuces/Archives/2016/October
Latest comment: 7 years ago by SashiRolls in topic New reference
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
hello
Actually when Hitler says the PEOPLES of islam, he means all the islams coutry, Arabs and north african, also go here : https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler read that, is a perfect cocordance with what hitler said about the Arabs — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.190.253.53 (talk) 20:13, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
New reference
Do you think we could cite this, especially, "1969 to present: Hillary accomplishes nothing."? I am joking of course--I love HRC, as I always say. But I think Wikipedia needs a bit of humor. Enjoy!Zigzig20s (talk) 02:35, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Zigzig20s, that's funny. BTW I find it interesting to look at the editing history of Clinton's strongest defenders. None of them have any interest in liberal or progressive issues. TFD (talk) 13:31, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
- I too wonder where they all come from, as they don't seem to behave the way us Wikipedians usually do. I see a lot of focus on personalizing editors instead of focusing on RS-based content, which is rather odd. It reminds me a little bit of no. 13 of Rules for Radicals: "“Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.". Allegedly.Zigzig20s (talk) 16:38, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
- Well, having just suffered ANEW at the hands of the Snoog, I can only concur. ^^ (Surprisingly, I got out of the burning pit alive.)
- I too wonder where they all come from, as they don't seem to behave the way us Wikipedians usually do. I see a lot of focus on personalizing editors instead of focusing on RS-based content, which is rather odd. It reminds me a little bit of no. 13 of Rules for Radicals: "“Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.". Allegedly.Zigzig20s (talk) 16:38, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
- It's the WaPo, no problem! ^^ SashiRolls (talk) 04:55, 23 October 2016 (UTC)