Your submission at Articles for creation: Jenny Barvis (June 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 14:26, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, The Bloodhound! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 14:26, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

June 2022

edit
 

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. KylieTastic (talk) 14:26, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Sdrqaz (talk) 15:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

for what? The Bloodhound (talk) 15:08, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Explain!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The Bloodhound (talk) 15:11, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
For creating an attack page, interestingly around the time that two other accounts did the same. Could you also provide an explanation for this? Sdrqaz (talk) 15:12, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
What were the names? The Bloodhound (talk) 15:13, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Yeah hes a contributor, What 2 accounts? The Bloodhound (talk) 15:15, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
WHAT DO YOU MeAN The Bloodhound (talk) 15:19, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
You obviously don't know what you're talking about The Bloodhound (talk) 15:21, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
you should investigate more before accusing me of such a thing The Bloodhound (talk) 15:22, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
The two others were StandardJake and WWE1252. Sdrqaz (talk) 15:22, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
I never heard of the accounts, unless its a coincidence The Bloodhound (talk) 15:23, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
This is obviously a coincidence, compare the ip addresses The Bloodhound (talk) 15:25, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
ThAt Is If YoUr MaKiNg A MiStAkE, and don't wanna embarrass yourself The Bloodhound (talk) 15:28, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Investigate more, Compare the ip addresses, and then you'll get the answer The Bloodhound (talk) 15:32, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Oh and by the way on my sandbox page remove view StandardJake and WWE1252, those aren't my accounts The Bloodhound (talk) 15:36, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Please release me from my block, I swear to you i didn't make those accounts, Compare the IP Addresses it will solve this whole problem, Investigate more before you accuse me. The Bloodhound (talk) 16:09, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
I know your active, you just declined an article seconds ago The Bloodhound (talk) 16:17, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Please release me from my block, I swear to you i didn't make those accounts, Compare the IP Addresses it will solve this whole problem, Investigate more before you accuse me. The Bloodhound (talk) 17:23, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply