User talk:The Account 2/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Juche into Ideology of the Workers' Party of Korea. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:34, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Diannaa: Thank you for telling me! Forgot to do, and the article was temporarily deleted anyway (until another user reverted the edits) but thanks again for reminding me! Won't forget next time :) The Account 2 (talk) 21:41, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
President of the Liberal Democratic Party (Japan)
Hi @The Account 2: Great article. I like these visual articles. I reviewed your article per WP:NPP page review. When you create a table based article with one summary article in every row, you need to add a reference in that row. There is usually notes column that has the reference. Can you please add a reference per line. It would be great to see. You also don't need the "himself" thing. Every where you a himself replace with full referencing to confirms he was leader. Hope that helps. scope_creepTalk 14:15, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Scope creep:, thanks! However, I must say that I didn't create the table, but merely imported it from the original Liberal Democratic Party (Japan) article. I'll consider adding sources to it though, and oh, thanks for welcoming me to Wikipedia! The Account 2 (talk) 14:29, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thats great. The two references that are on it are insufficient to keep it out of draft, but since you updating it with refs it can stay there. scope_creepTalk 14:46, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
September 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Chinese Communist Party, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. InvadingInvader (talk) 05:53, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for your efforts
Nomination of 2022 Kremlin speech of Vladimir Putin for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 Kremlin speech of Vladimir Putin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
QueenofBithynia (talk) 21:50, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Trouble with pages being drastically modified
Hello,
There seem to be some problems on the List of countries by GDP (nominal) per capita and List of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita pages. A user called Groverlynn wishes to drastically alter the format of these articles & refuses to have the latest IMF data, for this year, shown -- insisting it is wrong & only previous years should be used instead... other users have objected to these changes, but to no avail. Perhaps someone can intervene?
Requested move
An editor has requested for Guancha.cn to be moved to Guancha. Since you had some involvement with Guancha.cn, you might want to participate in the move discussion (if you have not already done so). -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 04:50, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
November 2022
 | This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Uyghurs, Uyghur genocide, or topics that are related to Uyghurs or Uyghur genocide. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 06:37, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Shanghai Municipal People's Government moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Shanghai Municipal People's Government, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:01, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Chinese Communist Party Shanghai Committee moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Chinese Communist Party Shanghai Committee, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 21:34, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
A Barnstar for your efforts
|
Zhonghua Barnstar of Merit | |
| For your contributions to one institution with two names and the global understanding of the party-state bureaucracy. | ||
| this WikiAward was given to The Account 2 by Abovfold (talk) on 16:49, 9 January 2023 (UTC) |
2018 party and government reform in China moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2018 party and government reform in China, is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. There are large sections which are wholly uncited. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.Onel5969 TT me 12:04, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Common prosperity article
Hi
I read you're "Common prosperity" article; very good! But I feel that you're misrepresenting what Deng Xiaoping actually said. Deng never said that "who redefined the term by saying that common prosperity meant that some could get rich before others"... Deng said that common prosperity was only viable if the country was advanced economically. That is, for common prosperity to be viable, some people needed to get rich first.
Communism and Mao are against egalitarianism. It is correct that his policies have been accused of egalitarianism after his death, but Mao did not support egalitarianism. He supported common prosperity because I thought China could advance such societal relations.
See .. I would at, the very least, include Deng's quote "letting some people get rich first and help others to get rich later". One should also note that common prosperity is according to the CPC something to be achieved, not something they have. It's an ideological goal - a goal on the way to communism. Tha's why he says: "The greatest superiority of socialism is that it enables all the people to prosper, and common prosperity is the essence of socialism".
These are my suggestions, but it would make the article better and more correct.
Other than that: great article! I was surprised to see such a topic being nominated for GA. Great work! TheUzbek (talk) 08:51, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot! Will edit. The Account 2 (talk) 18:46, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Common prosperity
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Common prosperity you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:41, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Common prosperity
The article Common prosperity you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Common prosperity for comments about the article, and Talk:Common prosperity/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:03, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for the contributions
Hello! Saw the changelog, no problem. All I had done was make neutral that one portion (two sentences in the lede) when they were replicated/moved up from the body. My submission must have occurred between edits, because in retrospect I see how other changes were overwritten. You seemed to have noticed my intention and corrected it, accordingly. Looks good, thank you for your work on it! Top5a (talk) 02:02, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oh it's ok don't worry about it, and thanks a lot! :) The Account 2 (talk) 08:15, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Common prosperity
On 23 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Common prosperity, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Chinese leader Xi Jinping called common prosperity an essential requirement of socialism but also said that it does not represent uniform egalitarianism? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Common prosperity. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Common prosperity), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
CS1 error on Wang Jingwei regime
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Wang Jingwei regime, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:35, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Propaganda in China
Given your knowledge and expertise on related topics, you might see that propaganda in China is out-of-date and could use some of your help. Thanks! - Amigao (talk) 19:58, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Amigao: Thanks! I will look (a bit busy to make large-scale changes right now but I'll do it as soon as I have the time). By the way, something that may be of your interest since you write about these topics; an article published by Ming Pao, citing sources, said that the CCP is considering creating a "Central Internal Affairs Commission" that will report directly to the CCP Central Committee during the upcoming session of the National People's Congress. Additionally, the Ministry of Public Security and the Ministry of State Security will apparently be transferred from the State Council to this new Commission. The article also says the Commission will be chaired by Wang Xiaohong. Seems like a major change to the Chinese security apparatus. The Account 2 (talk) 18:08, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Good work with common prosperity and thanks for the help with propaganda in China. Could also use your good eye on elections in China when you have some time. - Amigao (talk) 23:14, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! Will check. The Account 2 (talk) 17:26, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- I noticed that the below (the reference links are included on the articles) keeps getting removed from Propaganda in China and Censorship of Wikipedia. Any thoughts?
- Despite being censored in mainland China, and as VPNs are normally not allowed to edit Wikipedia, Wikipedia administrators from China have permitted IP block exemptions for a select number of mainland users. Such users are recruited to change the editorial content on Wikipedia in support of China's viewpoint and/or to support the election of pro-Chinese government administrators on Wikipedia, with the aim of gaining control of Wikipedia. Academics suggested that “China urgently needs to encourage and train Chinese netizens to become Wikipedia platform opinion leaders and administrators … [who] can adhere to socialist values and form some core editorial teams.”
- The pro-Beijing Wikipedia community, the Wikimedians of Mainland China (WMC), have clashed with Wikipedia editors from Taiwan, not only over Wikipedia's content, but also making death threats made against Taiwan's community of Wikipedians. One Taiwanese editor suggested that it was not just patriotic mainlanders, but a "larger structural coordinated strategy the government has to manipulate these platforms" beside Wikipedia, such as Twitter and Facebook. The Wikimedians of Mainland China (WMC) also threatened to report Wikipedia editors to Hong Kong's national security police hotline over the disputed article "2019–2020 Hong Kong protests" characterized by edit warring. A Hong Kong-based editor, who remains anonymous because of fears of intimidation, noted that "Pro-Beijing people often remove content that is sympathetic to protests, such as tear gas being fired and images of barricades. They also add their own content". Acknowledging that "edit wars" happen on both sides, the anonymous editor stated that "Pro-democracy editors tend to add content to shift the balance or the tone of the article, but in my experience, the pro-Beijing editors are a lot more aggressive in churning out disinformation. It's now unfixable without external interference. Someone is trying to rewrite history."
- On 13 September 2019, the Wikimedia Foundation banned seven Wikipedia users and removed administrator privileges from twelve users that were part of Wikimedians of Mainland China (WMC). Maggie Dennis, the foundation's vice present of community resilience and sustainability, said that there had been an yearlong investigation into “infiltration concerns” that threatened the "very foundations of Wikipedia". Dennis observed that the infiltrators had tried to promote "the aims of China, as interpreted through whatever filters they may bring to bear", suggesting possible links to the Chinese Communist Party. Dennis said “We needed to act based on credible information that some members (not all) of that group [WMC] have harassed, intimidated, and threatened other members of our community, including in some cases physically harming others, in order to secure their own power and subvert the collaborative nature of our projects”.
- HertzUranus (talk) 19:17, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hmmm, I think the longer part may be more appropriate in the Censorship of Wikipedia article, where it is already mentioned right now it seems. I would also support a shorter version in the Propaganda of China article, though it needs to be trimmed at it doesn't seem like such a critical example considering the long history of propaganda in modern China. Also, welcome to Wikipedia! The Account 2 (talk) 19:20, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- I noticed that the below (the reference links are included on the articles) keeps getting removed from Propaganda in China and Censorship of Wikipedia. Any thoughts?
- Thanks! Will check. The Account 2 (talk) 17:26, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Good work with common prosperity and thanks for the help with propaganda in China. Could also use your good eye on elections in China when you have some time. - Amigao (talk) 23:14, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Shanghai Municipal People's Government has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
~Kvng (talk) 23:59, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Chinese Communist Party Shanghai Committee has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
PK650 (talk) 04:05, 26 July 2023 (UTC)August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
| Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive |  |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |
September 2023
Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Council of Chairpersons. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 17:09, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chaoyang District. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (second request)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Five-year plans of China into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:34, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Have a great Mid-Autumn Festival this year
06:25, 29 September 2023 (UTC) Yue🌙 06:25, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Yue:Thanks a lot! Have a great Mid-Autumn Festival as well!
Disambiguation link notification for October 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Central Leading Group for Taiwan Affairs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page China News.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
October 2023
Your edit to Ministry of Industry and Information Technology has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 23:55, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:2018 party and government reform in China
Hello, The Account 2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2018 party and government reform in China, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, The Account 2. Thank you for your work on Free trade agreements of China. User:Lightburst, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for the Free Trade Agreements article. Please improve the references - use MOS:REF as a guide and WP:RS to decide what a reliable soure is.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lightburst}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Lightburst (talk) 14:25, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages
Thank you for your recent articles, including Fourteenth five-year plan (China), which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You can also use a friendly script for that. You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:14, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Template:Infobox Central Committee outline
Hi
Thanks for adding the template "Infobox Central Committee outline" to the article Central Committee of the Communist Party of Vietnam! I've made some changes to it, and modelled it on the versions on the Presidency of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia, the Central Committee of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia, the 12th Central Committee of the Communist Party of Vietnam and the 12th Politburo of the Communist Party of Vietnam. I hope you approve of my changes. TheUzbek (talk) 08:01, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, ut's very useful template due to the unique status of communist parties. Also, great job you did with all the Communist Party related pages! Many of the membership lists look much better now. The Account 2 (talk) 10:34, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:2018 party and government reform in China
Hello, The Account 2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2018 party and government reform in China".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:03, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
How about you update the China GDP table?
Since you seem to want to remove outdated material from the China article, how about you update the GDP table? The 2022 GDP number has come in and the one on the table is not that number, meaning that the table is outdated.
The article also needs more recent material on the nasty economic news recently out of China, from the real estate collapse, to derisking, to increasing levels of pollution, to an emerging banking crisis from at least $1 trillion in now unpayable real estate debt. 108.26.243.70 (talk) 20:09, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Interesting
You might find this SCMP article interesting. Amigao (talk) 02:55, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, will look at it. The Account 2 (talk) 09:58, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
|
Christmas Barnstar |
| Awarded to you for your contributions on Christmas Day, because apparently you also have nothing better to do over the holidays than edit Wikipedia! Yue🌙 10:06, 25 December 2023 (UTC) |
- Merry Christmas to you too, Yue (talk · contribs)! And yeah, I'm definitely going to take a brief holiday these days. 😂 The Account 2 (talk) 11:07, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
December 2023
Your edit to Xi Jinping Thought has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 18:39, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, Diannaa (talk · contribs), what can I do to adding avoid copyrighted material? The information I added was a rough translation of a work published by the Chinese Communist Party. The translation, however, did match the China Media Project translation pretty closely. Are translations protected by copyright as well? Thanks, and sorry if I caused any trouble. The Account 2 (talk) 19:00, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- Translation of a copyright work still enjoys copyright protection, because it's a derivative work. Optiona are, either re-write the content in your own words, or offer a link to a website where the content is available. — Diannaa (talk) 14:20, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks a lot! Will take care to not add such material from now on. The Account 2 (talk) 16:10, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
- Translation of a copyright work still enjoys copyright protection, because it's a derivative work. Optiona are, either re-write the content in your own words, or offer a link to a website where the content is available. — Diannaa (talk) 14:20, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
I think the December 1991 agreement between the two Koreas should be listed in the Establishment section of the infobox because it is an important document of Korea to establish the foundation of relations between the two Koreas, I think this document is more important than the Panmunjom Declaration. Perhaps we also need to mention this document in the main section of the article. https://ko.wikisource.org/wiki/%EB%82%A8%EB%B6%81%EC%82%AC%EC%9D%B4%EC%9D%98_%ED%99%94%ED%95%B4%EC%99%80_%EB%B6%88%EA%B0%80%EC%B9%A8_%EB%B0%8F_%EA%B5%90%EB%A5%98%C2%B7%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5%EC%97%90_%EA%B4%80%ED%95%9C_%ED%95%A9%EC%9D%98%EC%84%9C Newwikinguser (talk) 14:26, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- I find a reliable source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1991/12/13/two-koreas-pledge-to-end-aggression/d104ab96-1a85-4024-8b61-bf9e43d779eb/
- Also this: https://2001-2009.state.gov/t/ac/rls/or/2004/31012.htm
- And this: https://www.nytimes.com/1991/12/13/world/koreas-sign-pact-renouncing-force-in-a-step-to-unity.html Newwikinguser (talk) 12:31, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- @The Account 2: You removed a detail on Korea which has been repeatedly added to that article by socks of Phạm Văn Rạng. I cannot say affirmatively that this new user, who created their account not even a day after you made your edit, is a sock of PVR's, but a duck is a duck. Yue🌙 03:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Bureaucratic re-organizational question
I'm a bit unclear on the following China state bureaucracy question following the 2018 re-organization and thought you might know the answer. I've noticed your strong handle on the org chart following these changes. The Office of National Red Tourism Coordination Group was within CNTA. Am I correct to think it is now within the Ministry of Culture and Tourism? I appreciate any insight or source suggestions you may have if you have the time. JArthur1984 (talk) 20:07, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- JArthur1984 (talk · contribs) Hmmm, this is a tough one as this seems to be a pretty niche group. I would've guessed that this group would be listed under the bureaus of the Ministry of Culture and Tourism, but that doesn't seem to be the case. According to this 2018 source, it seems that the Office of National Red Tourism Coordination Group has been merged to the Department of Resource Development of the Ministry of Culture and Tourism (把原国家旅游局全国红色旅游工作协调工作并入资源开发司，“承担红色旅游相关工作”之中。没有把红色旅游纳入产业发展司，这种设置更加合理。). Hope that helps! The Account 2 (talk) 21:15, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for this! JArthur1984 (talk) 22:34, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Sure! Anytime. The Account 2 (talk) 10:12, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for this! JArthur1984 (talk) 22:34, 16 January 2024 (UTC)