User talk:TheSandDoctor/Archives/2022/January

Latest comment: 2 years ago by TheSandDoctor in topic Hannah Montana FAC

GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022

Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive
 
January 2022 Backlog Drive:
  • On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.

Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages.

--Usernameunique

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).

Happy New Year!

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Merchandise giveaway nomination

 
A token of thanks

Hi TheSandDoctor/Archives/2022! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}}talk ~~~~~
 

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

@Sdkb: Wow!!! That is a first. Thank you very much!! --TheSandDoctor Talk 01:52, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, TheSandDoctor!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

@Davey2010: Thank you very much! I hope that you have a Happy New Year as well! --TheSandDoctor Talk 07:19, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Question from Bapa 1949 (00:20, 2 January 2022)

Hello SandDoctor, I would like to edit the page for "The Institute for Creation Research", (icr.org). In the "description" of ICR it says:"...that specializes in media promotion of pseudoscientific creation science and interpretation of the Genesis creation narrative ..." They are NOT, in any way, "pseudoscientific"! Almost everyone on staff there is a PhD in their field! As an example:

"Dr. Vernon Cupps received his B.S. with Honors and M.S. in Physics at the University of Missouri-Columbia, and his Ph.D. in Nuclear Physics at Indiana University-Bloomington, where he worked at the Indiana University Cyclotron Facility.[1] He is a published researcher with 73 publications, 18 of which are in refereed journals.

From 1980 to 1987, he was employed as a Research Assistant at the Indiana University Cyclotron Facility. He has been an officer in US Navy and worked as an applied physicist in a DOD material analysis laboratory. Between 1987 and 1988, Dr. Cupps filled a postdoctoral fellowship with Rutgers University. During this time he worked at LAMPF in Los Alamos, NM. Since 1988, he has been employed at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.[2]" (as per Wikipedia) This is hardly a "pseudoscientific" person!!

I am requesting that the derogatory term "pseudoscientific" be removed as ICR's scientific research/work has been performed by legitimate scientists and passed through peer reviews numerous times to be "reliable" science.

Thank you, Bapa1949 --Bapa 1949 (talk) 00:20, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

@Bapa 1949: This is a general response that applies to this situation. I have no desire to offend your beliefs and write this without any malicious intent. My sole purpose is merely describing what rules/guidelines Wikipedia has relating to topics such as this. Wikipedia articles require that everything be verifiable in reliable sources that are secondary from the subject in question. Currently, the article in question satisfies this as it has both University of Chicago Press and Routledge -- which are both considered reliable sources -- calling it pseudoscience. Wikipedia is a tertiary source and, as such, reflects mainstream consensus on matters. This may, at times, be flawed (example) but is more a reflection on societal issues as a whole than it is Wikipedia. Wikipedia isn't here to right great wrongs and values verifiability. What you mention is widely considered a fringe theory and is handled by that linked content guideline. Please review the blue links I have included and this following one: Wikipedia:Verifiability,_not_truth#"But_I_know_the_truth!". --TheSandDoctor Talk 07:17, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Question from Macgyverx1000plana on Battlestar Galactica (comics) (16:25, 2 January 2022)

Commo Sta Amigo u a grigo? --Macgyverx1000plana (talk) 16:25, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

 

What is a bot? I'm a new wiki editor.

Hotblonde007 (talk) 19:34, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi Hotblonde007! I am happy to answer that for you. Please see this page and it should explain everything. If you have any questions, please feel free to let me know. TheSandDoctor (mobile) (talk) 22:06, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following consensus at the 2021 RfA review, the autopatrolled user right has been removed from the administrators user group; admins can grant themselves the autopatrolled permission if they wish to remain autopatrolled.

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • The functionaries email list (functionaries-en lists.wikimedia.org) will no longer accept incoming emails apart from those sent by list members and WMF staff. Private concerns, apart from those requiring oversight, should be directly sent to the Arbitration Committee.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.
User:7&6=thirteen Thank you! Happy New Year to you too! --TheSandDoctor Talk 07:18, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Hannah Montana FAC

Hello again! I currently have Hannah Montana up as a Featured Article Candidate. If you are able to, I would appreciate your comments on the nomination, and thought you might be interested in the topic. I always appreciate any of your feedback, but I understand if you are unable to. Thank you! SatDis (talk) 03:49, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

  Done I'm sorry for the delay, SatDis --TheSandDoctor Talk 15:41, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Question from Romeo grass (06:29, 4 January 2022)

What is the future aim for what is being done in /with Wikipedia --Romeo grass (talk) 06:29, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

@Romeo grass: The Wikimedia Foundation has a public mission statement here. For Wikipedia specifically, it is basically to continue what we are already doing, improving encyclopedia articles and content. It isn't a goal that can be reached per se, which is what I think you were wondering about, but is basically one to strive to continually improve. --TheSandDoctor Talk 06:56, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Do u believe that in terms of the years moving forward the way we write and show our thoughts through literature has changed , (putting in consideration the many aspects that have arised which people are new too ,eg covid ,climate change , modification through technology etc) Romeo grass (talk) 10:09, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
@Romeo grass:Evidently that has happened through all of time. Take an example of modern vs Old English. If you want scientifically, until 323 BC the whole world thought the Earth was flat. Views change. --TheSandDoctor Talk 15:40, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:15, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

@CAPTAIN RAJU: Thank you! Hard to believe it's been...what? 5 years now? Wow...really feels honestly quite weird to write that down. Crazy how time flies! --TheSandDoctor Talk 08:18, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Laugh, I Nearly Died

 

Hello, TheSandDoctor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Laugh".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:20, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

01:22, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Question from Netherzone on User:Netherzone (02:51, 11 January 2022)

Hello TheSandDoctor! Imagine my surprise when I saw a little question mark in the lower left corner of my user page pop up telling me you are my mentor. I don't have a question at this time, but am very glad to know there is someone I can go to directly when I do need help in the future. Best regards, and thank you. --Netherzone (talk) 02:51, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

@Netherzone: You're welcome! --TheSandDoctor Talk 03:02, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Ah, I see now what happened. I was modifying my user preferences and clicked the check box for "enable editor help panel" (not knowing what it was). When I unchecked the box, the floating question mark disappered. But now I do have a real question for you...I also noticed that when I click on "contributions" on the top right corner of my user page, I can no longer see the list of my contributions, it's simply a blank page. Same when I click on the link on the left hand side bar under "Tools". Not sure if this is a software glitch, or if somehow I turned off the ability to see my own contributions. Any ideas about this mystery? Netherzone (talk) 03:05, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
@Netherzone: That is odd. What happens when you click Special:MyContributions? --TheSandDoctor Talk 03:06, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
I can see them when I go to Special:MyContributions. I'm guessing that when I changed several preferences I might have inadvertently done something.... Odd... Netherzone (talk) 03:08, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Problem resolved! I can see them again! Netherzone (talk) 03:10, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

19:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Question from KrisAteTheApple (18:49, 24 January 2022)

Hello how do you change the name of the document your working on --KrisAteTheApple (talk) 18:49, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello @KrisAteTheApple:! Help for moving a page can be found here. However, based on the promotional tone and borderline CV style that was on your user page, please review this guide to creating your first article, the notability policy for people, and this guideline about citing sources. In short, you need to demonstrate that the subject has received significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Most YouTube content creators or streamers do not meet this mark, but if you can show me 2-3 solid sources that are reliable, independent of the subject and each other, and have covered the creator in some depth, that may be enough. Please let me know if you have any questions or need further clarification. --TheSandDoctor Talk 04:41, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

21:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Question from Elizabeth Goins (22:16, 25 January 2022)

how do i edit an article --Elizabeth Goins (talk) 22:16, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

@Elizabeth Goins: I would recommend going through this interactive tutorial for how we work and how to edit. It is a good place to start. —TheSandDoctor (mobile) (talk) 02:01, 26 January 2022 (UTC) TheSandDoctor (mobile) (talk) 02:01, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

17:41, 31 January 2022 (UTC)