TheRithik

Welcome!

Hello, TheRithik! Welcome to Wikipedia! You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! v/r - Seawolf35 T--C 18:40, 6 February 2024 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your submission at Articles for creation: Agmay technologies (September 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Agmay technologies and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 15:31, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello, TheRithik! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 15:31, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Agmay technologies (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Agmay technologies and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drmies (talk) 16:16, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

September 2024

You have used sources that are either clearly noted as paid placement, unmarked press releases or marketing content, or blatant fake content farms which house unmarked SEO placement. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. These sources step far beyond those policies. Please carefully evaluate your references in the future, and ensure that you are in compliance with our mandatory paid editing disclosures. Sam Kuru (talk) 11:19, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

• foxinterviewer.com: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://spam.foxinterviewer.com

Agmay moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Agmay. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dcotos (talk) 12:44, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, TheRithik. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Agmay, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. as you published Draft:Agmay technologies . When it was not accepted, you published it in main space as Agmay . It appears from your edits that you may have conflicts of interest. Dcotos (talk) 13:01, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Agmay

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Agmay, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 19:20, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

September 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 00:13, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheRithik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand that my actions were perceived as advertising or self-promotion, and I sincerely apologize for any disruption this caused. I now fully recognize that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that values neutrality and notability above all. In future contributions, I will ensure that my edits comply with these principles and avoid conflicts of interest. I will focus on improving Wikipedia in a constructive and policy-compliant manner. I kindly request reconsideration of my block so I can contribute positively. Thank you. TheRithik (talk) 08:30, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Please be more specific than this general statement. What did you do wrong? What will you do differently? What edits do you intend to make? (Such as what articles or topic areas) 331dot (talk) 12:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request Reason:

I now understand that my previous edits violated Wikipedia’s conflict of interest and notability guidelines. Specifically, I realize that my edits were promotional in nature, which is not aligned with Wikipedia’s goal of maintaining neutrality. I apologize for this oversight.

I have since reviewed the relevant policies, including the guidelines on conflict of interest and notability, and I fully understand the importance of maintaining a neutral point of view and adhering to notability standards.

Moving forward, I plan to focus on contributing to articles that are unrelated to any personal or business interests. Specifically, I will concentrate on expanding and improving articles related to [insert topics unrelated to any conflicts of interest here, e.g., open-source software, public domain historical events, etc.], ensuring that all contributions are properly sourced and meet Wikipedia's neutrality and notability requirements.

I kindly request that you reconsider my block, and I assure you that any future contributions will comply fully with Wikipedia’s content policies.

Thank you for your consideration.

I would discuss unblocking you, but with you, not a chatbot. Try again in your own words and without the bot, please. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 16:29, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Requesting unblock

I have understood the reason for my block, the article that i published is more like advertising and promotional which is against the Wikipedia polices, I had learned from my mistake as this is my 1st article kindly please accept my apologie and unblock me

Thank you for considering my request

Firstly, it appears pretty clear that you are being compensated to edit, either directly or by being asked or expected to as a duty of employment. Is that correct? If so, why were the required disclosures not made? Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 19:26, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Firstly no one had paid me anything i had made this article out of my interest i heard about this company this is a aerospace startup company were they are working to build the EVTOL, when i talked to them i felt there journey inspiring and i want to write an article on there company as my 1st article but as this is my 1st article i made the mistake of overseeing the polices of Wikipedia and used some words which are more likely advertising and self promotion, Now i understood clearly about the policy's next time when i write an article i will look over my words, and my source for the article carefully

Not sure I buy that, but given that you assert that, if you were to be unblocked, it would be on condition that you do not do any more editing about Agmay whatsoever. Do you have anything else you're interested in editing? If so, what? Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 20:00, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

i accept your condition and i won't do any more editing on Agmay, yes i am interested in editing more on the technology side like how the new technologies are entering into the markets, how these technologies are changing the human needs etc. TheRithik (talk) 20:27, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

I've unblocked your account per that condition. I will also note that creating an appropriate new article is quite difficult, so I recommend gaining experience editing existing articles before you try a new one. Once you think you are ready, use of the draft and articles for creation process initially is probably better than jumping straight to creation in mainspace. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 20:38, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for understanding, i will follow your advice and work on some existing articles, once again thank you for unblocking me TheRithik (talk) 20:45, 1 October 2024 (UTC)