TheRichic
Welcome!
|
Disambiguation link notification for April 23
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Patrimonio Nacional, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Toledo and Cáceres. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve 1st Government under the restored Monarchy of Spain
editHi, I'm TonyBallioni. TheRichic, thanks for creating 1st Government under the restored Monarchy of Spain!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The article could be improved by adding references for verification by the reader.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Disambiguation link notification for May 3
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spokesperson of the Government of Spain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Partido Popular. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (President of the Constitutional Court of Spain) has been reviewed!
editThanks for creating President of the Constitutional Court of Spain, TheRichic!
Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thank you for creating this useful article!
To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
A page you started (President of the Supreme Court of Spain) has been reviewed!
editThanks for creating President of the Supreme Court of Spain, TheRichic!
Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thank you for creating this useful article! In the future, please put the "See also" section before any references section. Thanks!
To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
A page you started (List of Presidents of the Supreme Court of Spain) has been reviewed!
editThanks for creating List of Presidents of the Supreme Court of Spain, TheRichic!
Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thank you for creating this useful article! In the future, please make sure that all text you add to the article is in English, instead of Spanish.
To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Ways to improve Consuelo Madrigal
editHi, I'm Mduvekot. TheRichic, thanks for creating Consuelo Madrigal!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The page is a translation of es:Consuelo Madrigal, which should be attributed properly. Please see Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia#Translating_from_other_language_Wikimedia_projects for instructions. I also noticed a couple of errors in the translation that I'm not going to attempt to fix, since I don't speak Spanish well enough to do so, although it seems obvious that" to occupe this position" should probably be "to occupy the position". Others are not so obvious. I have no idea what "she sworn her charge" means for example; does it mean to "take office"? Thanks,
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
A page you started (Public Administration of Spain) has been reviewed!
editThanks for creating Public Administration of Spain, TheRichic!
Wikipedia editor Usernamekiran just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
If possible, kindly add at least one source in English language.
To reply, leave a comment on Usernamekiran's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
—usernamekiran(talk) 11:34, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
edit
Hello, TheRichic. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (Joint Cyber-Defence Command) has been reviewed!
editThanks for creating Joint Cyber-Defence Command, TheRichic!
Wikipedia editor Ifnord just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
It would be helpful if you indicated which country (I am assuming Spain) this deals with.
To reply, leave a comment on Ifnord's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Speedy deletion nomination of Official Credit Institute
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Official Credit Institute requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.ico.es/en/web/ico_en/what-ico-is. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:25, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
References for the articles you're creating
editHello! I just stumbled across several of the articles you've created on cabinets in Spain. Please, please go back through the aritcle you've created and add a reference to where you found the information you're writing here. I'm looking in particular at 1st Government under the restored Monarchy of Spain, 2nd Government under the restored Monarchy of Spain, and Third Suárez Cabinet, but I'm guessing there are many more. If you need help formatting references just post here and I'm happy to help. Thanks in advance. Ajpolino (talk) 19:09, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Lionel Messi
editHello!
I noticed that you reverted my recent edit on Lionel Messi's article few days ago. I wanted to remind you that the nationality of the footballers has been the subject to many discussions on WikiProject Football. That's the reason why I linked the editing manual on players' articles to my edit. There you can find links to these exact discussions.
The current general consensus among editors is that the nationality of the players should be the same as the national team she/he represents, even if the player has a dual nationality which is the case by Lionel Messi.
Thank you and take care! --Saksapoiss (talk) 15:56, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Alleged vandalism
editThis is an answer to the section you wrote in my talk page: User_talk:Filiprino#Vandalism_warning. Legal aspects do not serve as a way to define someone as catalan or spanish. For instance, in Spanish Wikipedia Catalan toponyms are written in Castilian Spanish, not in Catalan which is the official naming scheme. Moreover, science, not politics, is what is used to write articles in Wikipedia. Read this article, please: [1]. Also, you seem to have a conflict of interest, from your user page: This user is a Monarchist. This user is a member of WikiProject Spain. This user is interested in Spanish history. This user lives in Spain. Este usuario tiene el español como lengua materna. You wrote in my userpage due to the article Jordi Borràs. He is Catalan for sure, Spanish we don't know. We should ask him if he thinks is Spanish. But you can't remove the fact he is Catalan and replace it with Spanish. You are negating his Catalan nationality as well as negating the plurinationality of Spain. These Wikipedia articles will give you insight: Spanish nationalism, Nationalities and regions of Spain, National and regional identity in Spain. But please, don't try to bring on an speedy deletion on article Jordi Borràs i Abelló. Also, it seems you are the one having problems with sources, in these three articles: 1st Government under the restored Monarchy of Spain, 2nd Government under the restored Monarchy of Spain and Third Suárez Cabinet. Also, I have to inform you that the page Societat Civil Catalana has been protected due to the blanking you applied to full sections of the page on top of other vandalisms made by WP:SPA accounts and WP:COI accounts. Filiprino (talk) 15:29, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 13
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Solicitor General of Spain, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Francisco Serrano and José Canalejas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Cut-and-paste moves
editPlease do not perform cut-and-paste moves as you did with Ministry of Foreign Affairs, European Union and Cooperation (Spain) and Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Spain). Attribution is a copyright requirement, even when copying within Wikipedia. If you want the article to be renamed by moving Ministry of Foreign Affairs, European Union and Cooperation (Spain) to Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Spain), you can request it at WP:RMTR if it is uncontroversial. If the title change is potentially controversial, you can start a requested move discussion by following the instructions at WP:RMCM. Bennv3771 (talk) 14:06, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
TheFamousPeople.com as a source
editHi TheRichic. I noticed that you recently used thefamouspeople.com as a source in European War Office. Please note that there is general consensus that thefamouspeople.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for such information. (Discussions here and here). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 17:14, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
I doubt that musiqueenligne.com is reliable too. Also, the article has considerable commentary, essay-like language, and awkward grammar. My impression is that it may have been quickly translated from somewhere else. I held off on tagging it, hoping that the unreliable source would be enough for you to review it all much more carefully. --Ronz (talk) 20:20, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
edit Hello, TheRichic. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Talkback
edit
Message added 19:40, 20 December 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://banana-soft.com/5-most-important-news-agencies-world?language=en, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:13, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Diannaa, I'm sorry to tell you that you are wrong. The information has been obtained from RTVE web, it's a direct translation from it and from the Agencia EFE official website. Possibly, that website that you mentioned also translated the same information. The info has been translated from the Spanish wikipedia and the sources has been revised. TheRichic
(Messages here) 21:17, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
List of Ministers of Justice of Spain moved to draftspace
editAn article you recently created, List of Ministers of Justice of Spain, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:01, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Interministerial Committees) has been reviewed!
editThanks for creating Interministerial Committees.
User:Onel5969 while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
Keep up the good work.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
I have sent you a note about a page you started
editThanks for creating Secretary of State for Employment (Spain).
User:Cwmhiraeth while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
When you translate text from a foreign language Wikipedia you should provide attribution to the original authors in your edit summary and by adding a translation tag to the talk page, as I have done in this instance.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cwmhiraeth}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:25, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for your suggestions, @Cwmhiraeth:, but the original author on the wikipedia in Spanish is me. I didn't know about the translation tag, thanks too.TheRichic (Messages here) 12:40, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
- No harm done then! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:54, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 30
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Second Deputy Prime Minister of Spain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page People's Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:45, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello TheRichic, you reverted my edit, why? See title Gonzalo Moliner. Regards --Serols (talk) 09:18, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi, @Serols:, the complete name is Gonzalo Moliner Tamborero. Gonzalo is his name and Moliner and Tamborero are his first (paternal) and second (maternal) surnames. TheRichic .svg){kind=small}
(Messages here) 10:14, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of Ministers of Justice of Spain, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
"Ministry of of Science, Innovation and Universities" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ministry of of Science, Innovation and Universities. Since you had some involvement with the Ministry of of Science, Innovation and Universities redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC678 04:32, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
"CNI Director" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit A discussion is taking place to address the redirect CNI Director. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 3#CNI Director until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 20:34, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of List of wedding guests of Prince Felipe and Letizia Ortiz for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of wedding guests of Prince Felipe and Letizia Ortiz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of wedding guests of Prince Felipe and Letizia Ortiz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sandstein 17:54, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Custom signature fix needed
editHi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.
The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error, specifically formatting tags that are in the wrong order.
The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.
- Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:
- Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
- Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
- Remove anything in the Signature: text box.
- Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
- Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:
- Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
- Change the signature as shown below, or make other edits to make the signature appear how you want it to appear.
- Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.
Current signature:
[[User:TheRichic|TheRichic]] [[File:Escudo de España (mazonado).svg|12px]] ''<small>([[User talk:TheRichic|Messages here]])</small>
Fixed signature:
[[User:TheRichic|TheRichic]] [[File:Escudo de España (mazonado).svg|12px]] ''<small>([[User talk:TheRichic|Messages here]])</small>''
More information is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:03, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:List of Ministers of Justice of Spain
edit
Hello, TheRichic. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Ministers of Justice of Spain".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:57, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ITN recognition for John Elliott (historian)
edit
On 12 March 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article John Elliott (historian), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 09:04, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
edit Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Happy Eighth First Edit Day!
edit
|
Hey, TheRichic. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 14:33, 29 January 2023 (UTC) |
|
Los artistas: primeros trazos
editHello. The country of origin of the series is Mexico. Also IMDB is considered an unreliable source per WP:IMDB. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 15:22, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Charles III requested move discussion
editThere is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 07:06, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Other British monarch requested move discussions currently taking place
editSince you recently participated in the Charles III requested move discussion, I thought you might like to know that there are two other discussions currently going on about other British monarch article titles here and here. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 22:21, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHello, TheRichic. Thank you for your work on Jaime Alfonsín. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Salvador Dalí
editHello there
Please note that Dalí is universally known as Salvador Dalí in English and the info box is correct. I reverted your recent edits to this page which amounts to a copyright notice. The article already has the notice and a link to the Dalí foundation. I moved it to the Legacy section where it more logically belongs. I am sure there were more interesting things in his will than his copyright. Thank you. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 23:03, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hello there. For the future, before removing some edits, talk first with the editor or open a topic in the discussion. You have no more criteria than other editors to judge is soemthing is relevant or not. That kind of actions may cause edit wars. Thanks. TheRichic (Messages here) 05:31, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
edit Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Minor and not-so-minor edits
editPlease be more careful when you mark edits as minor. This is not a minor edit because you added information about the counter-signature. This is not a minor edit because it changes the national / regional origin of a person. This is not a minor edit because you changed people's names. To quote the {{uw-minor}} warning template, '"Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word.' Thanks, and happy editing. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 09:50, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
December 2023
edit
Your edit to Regulation of artificial intelligence has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. CC BY-NC 4.0 is not a compatible license. — Diannaa (talk) 15:02, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I know that most of the time we've been using "Business" as a translator for "Empresa" here in Wikipedia, but it looks like it may not be quite accurate; both because "business" is not as wide in scope as "enterprise" (which connotes something more extensive and more far-reaching than just a business) and because sources do actually use "Enterprise" as a valid translation ([2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9], etc.). Impru20talk 12:32, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
edit | Happy First Edit Day! Hi TheRichic! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 03:05, 29 January 2024 (UTC) |  |
The article Felipe VI you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Felipe VI for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Averageuntitleduser -- Averageuntitleduser (talk) 00:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Link reverts
editI wanted to inquire why you reverted all my edits for links on certain Spanish writers? I don't want to start a revert war so I figured I would reach out first. I don't see any cause to make the changes you did. The reason I edited the links in such a way was to give the reader historical context into when these writers were born. Having an unlinked "Spain" does not do the same thing. I will revert these articles back to my edit but I want to hear your reasoning first in case there is something I am missing. Reaching out in good faith. Thanks. Tpwissaa (talk) 11:34, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- The information on the infobox is about the place where they were born, not about the historial period of a country. If you want to provide context, you can develop it in the article, not in the templates. You are free to reverse it, but I will do the same. If this is a topic that interests you a lot, I recommend you to open a topic in the village pump to discuss it and avoid editing wars. Greetings. TheRichic (Messages here) 12:41, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your reply. Respectfully, your response does not make much sense to me. These men were born into historical eras where much of the time the state of their birth did not exist at the time of their death. The information I linked to was not superfluous. Infoboxes are supposed to be a quick guide for a person's biographical information. All I did was add links that highlighted the state they were born into or died in. Spain in 2024 is a different state than the one these men lived through. De-linking this information and just leaving "Spain" obscures the fact that the notion of what Spain is as a state has not been a consistent concept. If I were to reference someone born into the Ancien Regime in France who then died during the Second Republic and simply had "France" for both sets of information, this would be entirely misleading. Yes, it would be correct in the sense that both states were "France", however they were completely different systems with different conceptions of themselves. I am not trying to be condescending or combative, just explaining my reasoning. I will not get into an edit war, I just think you need to reevaluate your position. Tpwissaa (talk) 21:47, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- The reasoning that they are not the same country it is yours, it is not something generally accepted on Wikipedia. The fact that their political systems change does not necessarily change the country. In all the years I've been here, this is how it's done. As I said, to avoid conflicts and editing wars, open a topic for users to discuss whether we should put it in periods and not in countries, but do not make massive changes. Greetings. TheRichic (Messages here) 08:04, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- I will leave it there. Thank you for the dialogue. No ill will on my end. Best. Tpwissaa (talk) 11:08, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- The reasoning that they are not the same country it is yours, it is not something generally accepted on Wikipedia. The fact that their political systems change does not necessarily change the country. In all the years I've been here, this is how it's done. As I said, to avoid conflicts and editing wars, open a topic for users to discuss whether we should put it in periods and not in countries, but do not make massive changes. Greetings. TheRichic
- Thank you for your reply. Respectfully, your response does not make much sense to me. These men were born into historical eras where much of the time the state of their birth did not exist at the time of their death. The information I linked to was not superfluous. Infoboxes are supposed to be a quick guide for a person's biographical information. All I did was add links that highlighted the state they were born into or died in. Spain in 2024 is a different state than the one these men lived through. De-linking this information and just leaving "Spain" obscures the fact that the notion of what Spain is as a state has not been a consistent concept. If I were to reference someone born into the Ancien Regime in France who then died during the Second Republic and simply had "France" for both sets of information, this would be entirely misleading. Yes, it would be correct in the sense that both states were "France", however they were completely different systems with different conceptions of themselves. I am not trying to be condescending or combative, just explaining my reasoning. I will not get into an edit war, I just think you need to reevaluate your position. Tpwissaa (talk) 21:47, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Link Reverts
editHi, It seems as though we are going back down the road of you reverting my edits. We have been over this and I still do not accept your thinking with regards to this. However, I let it go with the links you previously did this to. It appears as though you are following my edits and reverting them. This is getting ridiculous. If you do not have a valid reason (such as incorrect information) there is absolutely no reason to continue. Please stop doing this. There is nothing more annoying than a wikipedia edit argument especially with someone stalking another person's edits. Thank you. Tpwissaa (talk) 17:29, 29 October 2024 (UTC)