Welcome! edit

Hello, TheNationalDigest, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Shattuck-Saint Mary's did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Magnolia677 (talk) 23:30, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: William C. Rorick (July 5) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Edward-Woodrow were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 14:01, 5 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, TheNationalDigest! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 14:01, 5 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: William C. Rorick (September 11) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 14:09, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

September 2023 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "TheNationalDigest", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because TheNationalDigest may refer to a company or organisation. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Qcne (talk) 14:10, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:William C. Rorick edit

  Hello, TheNationalDigest. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:William C. Rorick, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: William C. Rorick (February 17) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qcne were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 12:30, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chief Gene Saunders (February 27) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:04, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problem: Draft:William C. Rorick edit

  Hello TheNationalDigest! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Draft:William C. Rorick, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.williamrorick.com/about, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Draft talk:William C. Rorick saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:43, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your username edit

Hi! Why are you editing under the name of this publication? Under our username policy, usernames that are simply names of companies or groups are not permitted. Please go here to request a new name (or simply state the name you want here on this page and I'll change it for you). Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:49, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, new to this. How about 'tndnewsandknowledge'? TheNationalDigest (talk) 17:46, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Is there a way to get the Gen Saunders draft page back and I submit to you the original text in some way? The text was altered but taken from a site I made that you said I plagiarized from. If you tell me what and where I need to send from I can verify it for you. Thanks. TheNationalDigest (talk) 17:59, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
That is still a name prohibited by our policy; it looks like a role account. The individual person editing must be indicated, one way or another. Drmies (talk) 18:00, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
I looked at that draft but don't really understand the point. That website, if it's the source for the draft, in no way meets the requirements of WP:RS, and the draft does not meet the requirements of WP:GNG. So you could go through the whole rigamarole of getting that copyright matter cleared one way or another, but you would still not be able to use it as a source for an encyclopedic article. Drmies (talk) 18:03, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

March 2024 edit

 
Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because your username, TheNationalDigest, does not comply with Wikipedia's username policy. Your username is the principal reason for the block. You are welcome to continue editing after you have chosen a new username that complies with Wikipedia's username policy, which is summarized here.
Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change of your current account here. The new username that you choose must comply with Wikipedia's username policy.
  • To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then click here to make a new one.
  • If you prefer to change the username of this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page (this page): {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If your username is not in violation of Wikipedia's username policy, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your user talk page here: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you. Drmies (talk) 18:04, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply