'Welcome to the talk page of TheIrishWarden! Leave any messages for me on this page.
This user is on vacation.

Nice Wikipedians only!

WORKING HARD TO KEEP WIKIPEDIA VANDAL FREE!


Semi-protection

edit
 

This article has been semi-protected. Semi-protection prevents edits from unregistered users (IP addresses), as well as edits from any account that is not autoconfirmed (is at least four days old and has at least ten edits to Wikipedia) or confirmed. Such users can request edits to this article by proposing them on this talk page, using the {{Edit semi-protected}} template if necessary to gain attention. New users may also request the confirmed user right by visiting Requests for permissions.


Archived

edit

Please note that talk on this page before 2nd August 2012 has now been archived and can be found in Archive 1. Please only leave messages on this page though. Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 12:24, 2 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

To my contribution on the page called The Bells of Saint John - I had just written the entire plot for the episode and you just deleted it. Why? You made a mistake there by deleting it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheTreasureGamer (talkcontribs) 19:55, 30 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Back to edit responsibly!

edit

I'm back on Wikipedia after a year long ban due to sock puppetry. I pledge to be a good member, and will resume my duties in recent changes! Regards, TIW

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, TheIrishWarden. You have new messages at Eyesnore's talk page.
Message added 20:20, 22 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Eyesnore (pc) 20:20, 22 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

A beer for you!

edit
  Good to see you're back. Don't worry too much about the rollback tool for now. Put in the efforts and trust will be regained soon enough. Sportsguy17 (TC) 20:38, 22 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Winx Club

edit

I am sorry, but I did not threaten anyone. This other editor keeps on removing the information without any valid reason and they told me they will get the page semi-blocked if I continue reverting their edits. Therefore I also said that I will ask the Wikipedia admins to get the page blocked if they keep on reverting my edits.

The Winx Club page's "Plot" section needs to have information about the whole of the series' plot, including the events that happened in the movies since they are also part of the plot. However this other user reverts my edits because there is already a "Film" section on that page. However the "Film" section only contains technical details of the movies, not their plot and the "Plot" section also needs the movies' plot. 197.224.84.23 (talk) 22:04, 24 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

I am also sorry if I have broken any Wikipedia rule. However I have given valid reasons each time for reverting the other user's edits since it is important information that they are removing, and they keep on reverting mine again and again because "I am wrong" without giving any further valid reason, and they seem to be unwilling to listen to any counter-argument according to the messages they left when they reverted my edits. 197.224.84.23 (talk) 22:20, 24 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your RfA support

edit

Hi there, a bit of a form letter from me, Cyphoidbomb, but I wanted to drop you a line and thank you for your support at my recent RfA. Although I was not successful, I certainly learned quite a bit both about the RfA process and about how the community views my contributions. It was an eye-opener, to say the least. Thank you, and Sláinte! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:52, 30 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

A beer for you!

edit
  just to say Hi DBigXray 10:55, 20 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

September 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2014 military intervention against ISIS may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {{flagicon|United Kingdom}} [[Nick Houghton]]}}<br/>
  • *1 weapons depot destroyed <ref name="abcnews.go.com"/>}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:53, 26 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply