User talk:TheBlinkster/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, TheBlinkster, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa  ^Conversation 17:20, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

TheBlinkster, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi TheBlinkster! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! ChamithN (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 22:47, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you!!

Thank you for improving the Dr Kildare article it better than anything I could have ever achieved. Dwanyewest (talk) 20:55, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

− −

Hello, TheBlinkster/Archive 1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 03:50, 11 May 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

−

Replaceable fair use File:Casey anderson.jpg

−

− Thanks for uploading File:Casey anderson.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

− −

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.

−

1. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

− − Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

− − If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 17:02, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

−

Hello, TheBlinkster. You have new messages at User_talk:NickW557/Archive 9#Casey_anderson.jpg.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 17:21, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Duke lacrosse case

Hi. I wanted to thank you for the great job you're doing reorganizing and rewriting Duke lacrosse case. The article was really a mess. I appreciate the work you're doing. Thanks! — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 02:50, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, I'm glad you're finding it helpful. I find the case very interesting from a legal perspective because of the unusual issues of prosecutor misconduct, photo lineups, and the state AG actually declaring people innocent, but I think it is a hard article for anyone who isn't a lawyer to write. Whoever got it started did a pretty good job as most of the building blocks are there, it just needs to be pulled together and then it should be fine. I was initially just going to copyedit it, but it seemed like chunks were missing and there were some NPOV and BLP things so I got a little more into it than planned. Best, TheBlinkster (talk)

Moved query re article

Hi there, I was curious how much you charge to edit or add a wiki page. It has to do with the film"iron ridge". Cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.35.136.235 (talk) 03:35, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello. First of all, I do not "charge" to add or edit wiki pages. That's not how Wikipedia works. I add pages when I feel like it, on things of interest to me that meet Wiki's notability guidelines, and others are free to edit the pages I add as long as they don't violate Wiki guidelines (like adding material that violates a Wiki policy, or someone who's the subject of a page editing his own page, etc.) I (and others) also edit pages on stuff we're interested in/ have knowledge about. Second, with respect to the Iron Ridge film, if you have a comment on the page or something related to the film that you think should be made into a new page, then the proper way to raise the issue would be to put it on the talk page for the film where I and anyone else interested could see it. If you are someone affiliated with the film you should also state that in your talk page post as it's relevant to considering both your suggestions and the fact that you (as someone affiliated with the film) are limited in what you yourself can add/ edit. I hope this clarifies matters. TheBlinkster (talk) 04:00, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Having provided a few days in case you wanted to read the response at top of the talk page, I am now moving this to the bottom of my talk page in order to keep the page neat. Cheers, TheBlinkster (talk) 22:17, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I wanted to see what could be done with this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Stubrumbaugh/sandbox. I'm new to wiki and obviously there are some mistakes that have been and can't be published. Any advice? Cheers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.82.197.195 (talk) 01:35, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello again. In order for there to be a Wiki article about Stu Brumbaugh, he must meet the Wikipedia notability guidelines, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability . This basically means that there must be significant third-party source coverage of Mr. Brumbaugh; for example, books, magazine articles, newspaper articles, documentaries, etc. discussing him, written by neutral authors (pieces by Mr. Brumbaugh himself or his publicity team do not count). Then, the article may contain material that is supported by these sources. Furthermore, the article should be written by someone with no connection to Mr. Brumbaugh. As an example, I have written or contributed significant material to articles about several celebrities such as Casey Anderson, Bob "Hoolihan" Wells, John Sebastian Sr., and Michael Greer, none of whom I know personally or have ever met. I only know them through their work such as TV shows, films and recordings and was interested in what they did so I made a page for them or cleaned up an existing page. I do not write pages or make significant contributions to pages for celebrities I know personally or socially as that is against Wiki rules. So Mr. Brumbaugh's article would have to be written by an arms-length fan with enough knowledge of/ interest in him and his work to have research sources available and be able to write intelligently about the subject. I hope this sheds some light on what is required to have an article on Mr. Brumbaugh. Cheers, TheBlinkster (talk) 19:20, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Posted reply to "claim re Ricks cottage being same as Gentle Ben house" question

In case you're still interested in the issue, I wanted to let you know that I've posted a reply to the question you posted on the Flipper 1964 TV series Talk page concerning "claim re Ricks cottage being same as Gentle Ben house". 67.186.19.151 (talk) 17:10, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	For your recent efforts to improve the Murder of Dawn Magyar article! --GouramiWatcherTalk 19:01, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to From Here to Eternity, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Sections such as "differences from the novel" must be sourced to establish that the differences are considered significant in some manner. Wikipedia articles should not include trivia. DonIago (talk) 14:46, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

It's not really trivia or OR as there are sources discussing the material that the filmmakers changed or in some cases were made to change. I'll put it back once it's properly cited. Thanks, TheBlinkster (talk) 14:54, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Sounds good! DonIago (talk) 15:52, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

File:Xmas Ornament.jpg

To You and Yours!
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 03:49, 21 December 2015 (UTC)