January 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm Deepfriedokra. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Entertainer (discount publisher) have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. -- Deepfriedokra 08:15, 13 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to The Entertainer (discount publisher). While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. -- Deepfriedokra 08:34, 13 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

User:TheENTERTAINER2020 edit

If you are this user renamed, please let us know. If so, please read and heed WP:COI and WP:PAID. Please stop adding promotional content to Wikipedia.-- Deepfriedokra 08:36, 13 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Well, I answered my own question. Please read and heed the WP:COI message I left on User talk:TheENTERTAINER2020. It would be best if you discuss content rather than editing the article directly. "All content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking." Please see Wikipedia:Five pillars, particularly the one about "Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view". Thanks, -- Deepfriedokra 08:53, 13 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
Sorry to have created a misunderstanding. To clarify:
You must not edit The Entertainer (discount publisher) directly. You may suggest edits.
Please read User:deepfriedokra/promo. It may assist you in avoiding promotional content.
Please read and heed WP:COI and WP:PAID. Due to the connection with The Entertainer (discount publisher) ‎, there are disclosures you must make.
Please read the conflict of interest notice I placed on your original talk page, before you created this account.
Please remember that "all content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking." The subject's web site does not meet this requirement. Thanks, -- Deepfriedokra 19:39, 13 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

January 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm Deepfriedokra. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Entertainer (discount publisher), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Deepfriedokra 09:41, 13 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 12:12, 13 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheAppleofMyDubai (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am requested to be unblocked. It is of m understanding that because I did not respond to Deepfriedokra within a few hours, I was blocked. I was taking time to read and understand the rules and regs regarding updating a Wiki page. The page needs updating to its current state of information as it is entirely out of date and suggesting things that are no longer true. Please take time to understand this. I understand it is not for promotion and will adjust content to remove any promotional connotations. Thank you TheAppleofMyDubai (talk) 13:19, 13 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You are not blocked for failing to respond. You are blocked for being a Spam/advertising-only account. You have not sufficiently addressed this in your unblock request. Yamla (talk) 14:35, 13 January 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.