ThatPB95 Fan

This is ThatPB95 Fan's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Progressbar95 (April 10) edit

Latest comment: 1 month ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vrxces was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

To clarify the other comments on notability, the usual rule of thumb to comfortably meet WP:GNG is containing WP:THREE reliable reviews containing WP:SIGCOV from reliable sources of the type listed in WP:VG/S. I can find one for Lifehacker, and Android Central has unknown reliability: you may want to raise it in the talk page of WP:VG/S. Can you find more reliable review sources?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Progressbar95 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 22:10, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello!

Thanks for the suggestions.

Sadly, PB95 is a little niche, which is why there's not many reviews but the following:

- 3 reviews that were on the page in the draft.

- Metacritic user reviews (which are not allowed based on WP:VG/S)

- Portuguese review from a Wikipedia article of PB95 from the Portuguese Wikipedia

- Steam Curator Reviews (which I have no idea on the legality of).

And that's about it. If you could follow-up to me with some suggestions, that'd be nice. Thanks. ThatPB95 Fan (talk) 23:49, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, ThatPB95 Fan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 22:10, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure! edit

Hi ThatPB95 Fan! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 03:23, Thursday, April 11, 2024 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Add topic