User talk:Tgeorgescu/Archives/2020/December
Latest comment: 3 years ago by KIENGIR in topic FYI
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A question
Hey, as an alternative to Wikipedia, which is generally more reliable, Britannica or Conservapedia? Thx --GorgeousJ (talk) 17:08, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
- @GorgeousJ: Britannica, of course. Conservapedia promotes pseudoscience (scientific creationism, intelligent design) and often indulges in conspiracy theories. It also denies how much US owe to classical liberalism. Do note that I have nothing against conservatives like Reagan, Thatcher and Bush 41. They are rather my models in politics. Tgeorgescu (talk) 07:04, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
- Is Britannica a respectable source? --GorgeousJ (talk) 15:10, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
- @GorgeousJ: Inside Wikipedia we generally avoid to cite other encyclopedias. But, yes, generally speaking Britannica has articles (guess not all) written by full professors who are experts in such field. Tgeorgescu (talk) 15:32, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
- How reliable would Britannica be considered? --GorgeousJ (talk) 00:34, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
- @GorgeousJ: Depends upon which claim is being verified, who wrote the article, when and so on. Tgeorgescu (talk) 07:59, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
- How reliable would Britannica be considered? --GorgeousJ (talk) 00:34, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
- @GorgeousJ: Inside Wikipedia we generally avoid to cite other encyclopedias. But, yes, generally speaking Britannica has articles (guess not all) written by full professors who are experts in such field. Tgeorgescu (talk) 15:32, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
- Is Britannica a respectable source? --GorgeousJ (talk) 15:10, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
FYI
Hi,
see ([1]). The sock again started to insult you as well, it's really boring and enough, I asked the admin to revoke talk page access.(KIENGIR (talk) 13:47, 21 December 2020 (UTC))