Welcome!

Hello, Terot, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Srleffler 00:20, 23 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

I enjoyed your contribution at High Church Lutheranism, and made some adjustments and additions. See what you think!--Srleffler 00:20, 23 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Re: Evangelical-Catholic, is there a reason why you are adding categories to a redirect page? Redirects normally don't need to be categorized. (In fact, until recently the software did not even allow redirects to be categorized.)--Srleffler 22:43, 27 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Germany-related articles edit

Hi Terot,

I noticed you recently created a few Germany-related articles like Kirchliche Arbeit Alpirsbach and Heinrich Hansen. I just wanted to inform you that you can announce any Germany-related articles you created at Portal:Germany/New articles and Portal:Germany/New article announcements. Further, a WikiProject Germany is being started. If you're interested in contributing see User:Badbilltucker/WikiProject Germany and Wikipedia:WikiProject/List of proposed projects. Thanks --CarabinieriTTaallkk 14:21, 13 October 2006 (UTC) ==Edmund Tyrell Green Hi, Terot, I found the Date of Death on the fellow in question and edited the article to make it past tense. Cheers V. Joe 17:14, 11 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Michael Solomon Alexander edit

Well spotted - I'm merging them.--R613vlu 13:04, 19 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Johann Jacob Rambach article edit

GrittyLobo441 16:33, 1 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

"Category:Based on Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia" proposed for deletion edit

A CfD has been called against Category:Based on Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia and most other "categories by source". (The categories are proposed for deletion, not the articles within them). If this category is useful to you, and you would prefer it not to be deleted, please comment at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_March_24#"By-source_categories". Jheald Jheald 15:41, 25 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Lutheranism edit

The WikiProject Lutheranism Collaboration Project is under way. Please help improve this month's article, or make a suggestion for next month's article. To add the collaboration banner to your userpage or talk page, use {{Lutheran COTM}}. -- Pastordavid 19:31, 19 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Barnstars edit

Please offer your opinion on the two proposed Barnstars for WikiProject Lutheranism. Pastor David (Review) 18:25, 3 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

New category edit

Many thanks for your hard work in creating Category:Lutheran hymnwriters. I'm afraid I've been a bit distracted lately by a new task force I've joined and haven't been putting my all in all into Lutheran category work. Thanks for pitching in! Fishal 21:10, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Spelling of Lutheran names edit

I was going through the Lutherans mentioned in the book I referenced, and included the names as they were spelled there. I noted myself that on occasions this small-press book's spelling was at times erratic, but couldn't be sure that he was necessarily wrong, so went ahead with what I saw. Sorry for any spelling errors which creeped in. (For what it's worth, I actually won a five-state area award for vocabulary back in high school. I do note that some words, like "prosletyze", are ones I consistently screw up on. As that word has come up a lot in a recent discussion I've had, I made a comment on my poor spelling on that basis. But, in general, I try to ensure that I spell correctly, if I can verify the correct spelling. Except maybe on my user page. There, I am less interested in being correct than accurate, and spelling errors are something which I know can occasionally come up from me. But thank you for catching those errors, and helping ensure that mistakes don't stay in any articles too long.)John Carter 15:08, 5 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Award edit

Your dedication to creating new articles on Lutheran history and historical figures has more than earned you this...

  The Barnstar of Indulgence
In recognition of your dedication to increase the number and diversity of Lutheranism-related articles, I, Fishal, in Vollmacht aller Heiligen and under the auspices of the Lutheranism WikiProject, award you this Barnstar of Indulgence. Fishal 21:37, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Regarding edits to Claus Harms edit

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Terot! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bangelfire\.com\/, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 14:35, 4 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Category:Former Lutherans edit

You have recently recreated or reposted material at Category:Former Lutherans which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review. The previous discussion for deletion of this article can be found here. Thank you. - KrakatoaKatie 04:52, 13 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Johann Franck edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Johann Franck, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.ccel.org/s/schaff/encyc/encyc04/htm/ii.ix.xii.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:48, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

This article about Johann Franck includes content derived from the Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge, 1914, which is in the public domain. (Terot (talk) 14:55, 29 February 2008 (UTC))Reply

CfD nomination of Category:Luther's works edit

 

Category:Luther's works, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Good Ol’factory (talk) 05:35, 2 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Swedish heraldry edit

Thank you for your contributions to Swedish heraldry and its talk page! Since I have made considerable expansions to the page, I would like to invite you to take a look over my work, and I will take another look at it as well after I take a few days' wikiholiday. Thanks! Wilhelm meis (talk) 06:54, 6 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Dates edit

Hello Terot! While for years I have linked full dates, there now seems to be a trend to delink them (WP:DATE#Dates); that is why I removed the dates from the introduction of Johann Deutschmann. Cheers! Olessi (talk) 03:15, 18 September 2008 (UTC)Reply


Martin Bucer up for Featured Article Review edit

I just wanted to let you know that you can vote for or against Martin Bucer being the featured article at Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Martin_Bucer#Martin_Bucer. Thanks! --Epiphyllumlover (talk) 21:18, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

translation dispute edit

There is a discussion going on whether the name of that German church body can be translated or not (it appears like this on the english pages of this church's homepage). One user changed the name of this Church (actually a federation of several Lutheran, United and Reformed churches) and it's regional member churches to the German form because he says their names can't get translated. so the article on the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Bavaria now appears under its German name because he says the "concept" can't be translated into English. Please go to the discusson page of the Evangelical Church in Germany and have your say --93.130.249.56 (talk) 02:02, 3 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Mörlin edit

Hi Terot, I like your new article on Mörlin. Will you nominate it for DYK? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:11, 26 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi Gerda, thank you for your suggestion. I am not familiar with the procedure, would you care to do it for me? (Terot (talk) 19:16, 27 September 2010 (UTC))Reply
I looked and see a problem I had overlooked: articles for DYK have to be referenced by footnotes. If you want to do that, the procedure to nominate is simple: you pick a fact that looks interesting to the general public, word it in no more than 150 characters and reference it with a reliable source. Then you go to Main page and click "nominate an article" below the current "hooks" and take it from there, you may add a picture. It's just filling three fields in a template. Perhaps you want to write your next article with footnotes from the start rather than adding to this one? Template:Cite web is recommended. Good luck. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:14, 27 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! Is it only for new articles, or is it possible to nominate one of my old articles as well? (Terot (talk) 16:06, 28 September 2010 (UTC))Reply
Yesterday I answered in length, but forgot to save, sorry. Now, with less time: it's for articles not older than 5 days or expanded 5-fold within that time frame. I recommend to look at the suggestion page (s.a.) and get familiar with the process, watching how suggestions are sometimes questioned, then approved ... interesting reading! Then I would go for the next article and reference it from the start. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:28, 29 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ichthus: January 2012 edit

 

ICHTHUS

January 2012

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

Terveisiä edit

Moikka ja rauhaa! Tällä on englanninkielinen artikkeli Suomen Anglikaanisesta kirkosta. – Kaihsu (talk) 15:03, 15 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for December 10 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mathesius, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Finnish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 10 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Lutheran Rev Article Review edit

Rev Jordahl Article Peer Review edit

Hello! I see you have done a lot of work on Lutheran WP articles. I thought perhaps you could do a peer review on this article? Thanks!

Article: V. Trygve Jordahl

Nasa-verve (talk) 22:21, 16 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Opinion edit

Hi, i would like to have your opinion about a discussion which i started here, thank.Kingroyos (talk) 23:32, 27 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Terot. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Terot. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Frank Senn for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frank Senn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Senn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I-82-I | TALK 22:17, 25 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 4 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Cole Escola
added a link pointing to Finnish
Elizabeth McLaughlin
added a link pointing to Finnish
Victoria Moroles
added a link pointing to Finnish

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 4 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

September 2020 edit

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Joel McHale.
Please do not cite "Ethnicelebs" as a source of biographical information. The site is unreliable because according to its own ToS page (section 5), it makes no guarantee for the accuracy of its content. In line with WP:BLPSOURCES, biographies of living people must employ a high standard of sourcing.
SuperMarioMan (Talk) 21:01, 4 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Fair enough. But as a genealogist I don't understand what is cntroversial about it. Or has it got something to do with the recent race riots in America? (Terot (talk) 22:13, 4 September 2020 (UTC))Reply
That is not a very good way to respond. I was planning to do the same on your edit for Liza Weil as the source was overall poor (and also because the subject herself has never talked publically about her ancestreal heritage outside her immediate family). The reason for the reversions was solely BLPSOURCE, not an odd vendetta involving our racial justice situation. Assume good faith from now on. Nate (chatter) 01:48, 5 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
I assume good faith, you do the same :-) (Terot (talk) 02:12, 5 September 2020 (UTC))Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Norvind family edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Norvind family requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:17, 5 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

It can be deleted. (Terot (talk) 16:01, 5 September 2020 (UTC))Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Norvind acting family has been nominated for renaming edit

 

Category:Norvind acting family has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 01:51, 6 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Norvind acting family has been nominated for renaming edit

 

Category:Norvind acting family has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 17:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Liturgical renewal" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect Liturgical renewal has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 15 § Liturgical renewal until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 22:52, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Lord’s Supper" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect Lord’s Supper has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 7 § Lord’s Supper until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 23:59, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

November 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm Veverve. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Holy Name of Jesus, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Veverve (talk) 07:59, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

All right, thanks for letting me know. (Terot (talk) 21:22, 25 November 2023 (UTC))Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply