Terfslayer
June 2023
edit
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jesse Singal. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Please also see WP:NPOV and WP:BLP, and (as another editor had already indicated when reverting you) avoid misrepresenting sources. As general advice: Judging from your first edits and your user name, it seems that you are approaching this topic area from an activist mindset that is at odds with such Wikipedia principles, and are more familiar with environments where emotional outrage is regarded as a virtue and where distorting facts and attacking individuals is seen as acceptable if it serves a just cause. But on Wikipedia this rarely ends well. Regards, HaeB (talk) 22:14, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- shut up loser
Your recent editing history at Jesse Singal shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. HaeB (talk) 01:15, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
edit
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Terfslayer reported by User:HaeB (Result: ). Thank you. HaeB (talk) 01:31, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
June 2023
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 01:39, 19 June 2023 (UTC)- Talkpage access revoked. Acroterion (talk) 02:17, 19 June 2023 (UTC)