Welcome!

Hello, Temurjin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! .**My Cat inn @ (talk)** 04:50, 4 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Mongolian tugrug edit

Thank you for the info. I still need some info on the meaning and the origin of the "mongo" name. Timur lenk 08:17, 5 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

In addition to being 1/100 of tugrug, "mungu" means "money" and also "silver". My guess is that "silver" is the original meaning. Temur 23:04, 5 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Romanisation of Mongolian edit

Hi, I noticed that you're a native speaker of Mongolian. I thought you might be interested in the conversation ongoing at Wikipedia talk:Romanisation of Mongolian. Cheers, Nat Krause(Talk!·What have I done?) 19:16, 18 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Smile edit


WProject Relativity edit

Hi there. Thanks for joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Relativity! It's always a struggle to get editors to join such a project. Enjoy. :)MP (talkcontribs) 08:30, 25 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Central Asia edit

Hi - based on your interests on your userpage, I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Central Asia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aelfthrytha (talkcontribs) 03:40, 25 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

==Smile== edit

Smile edit


Orlicz space edit

That was a good observation on your part. The embedding theorem described in the article doesn't really belong under the heading of Orlicz-Sobolev spaces. Hopefully someone will eventually write a section on those, or perhaps a separate article. At this point I don't know much about them myself beyond the (obvious) definition. Perturbationist (talk) 02:18, 31 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Mongolia work group edit

Hi, I'd like to invite you to the Mongolia work group of the WikiProject Central Asia. You're welcome to add that page to your watchlist and participate in discussions there. So far, many general discussions about topics related to Mongolia have been discussed on individual user's talk pages, away from the attention of a wider audience. I hope that a centralized talk page will make communication between all of us easier. If a question doesn't primarily concern just one specific user, then the work group is probably the right place to ask it. See you there! --Latebird (talk) 06:09, 25 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Template:User RUG edit

A tag has been placed on Template:User RUG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:24, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ok. Thanks for catching that. That seems to be a mistake I forgot about. Temur (talk) 01:14, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Peer review idea edit

Hi, I have made a proposal that no peer review request be archived without some response. To aid in this, there is a new list of PR requests at least one week old that have had no repsonses beyond a semi-automated peer review. This list is at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog.

There are just over 100 names on the PR volunteers page, so I figure if each of these volunteers reviewed just one or two PR requests without a response from the list each month, it would easily take care of the "no response" backlog (as there have been 2 or 3 such unanswered requests a day on average).

If you would be able to help out with a review or two a month from the "no responses" backlog list that would be great (and much appreciated). Please discuss questions, comments, or ideas at the PR talk page and thanks in advance for your help, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 00:21, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Notability of James A. Isenberg edit

 

A tag has been placed on James A. Isenberg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ukexpat (talk) 21:32, 14 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

OK, that works - but we'll need a reference for that 1995 paper, or else the article could probably be nominated for deletion. I've removed the speedy deletion and hangon tags on that basis. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 23:43, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Request for Peer Review help edit

Thank you for you work as a peer review volunteer. Since March, there has been a concerted effort to make sure all peer review requests get some response. Requests that have gone three days or longer without a substantial response are listed at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog. I have three requests to help this continue.

1) If you are asked to do a peer review, please ask the person who made the request to also do a review, preferably of a request that has not yet had feedback. This is fairly simple, but helps. For example when I review requests on the backlog list, I close with Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, ...

2) While there are several people who help with the backlog, lately I have been doing up to 3 or 4 peer reviews a day and can not keep this up much longer. We need help. Since there are now well over 100 names on the PR volunteers page, if each volunteer reviewed just one PR request without a response from the list each month, it would easily take care of the "no response" backlog. To help spread out the load, I suggest those willing pick a day of the month and do a review that day (for example, my first edit was on the 8th, so I could pick the 8th). Please pick a peer review request with no responses yet, if possible off the backlog list. If you want, leave a note on my talk page as to which day you picked and I will remind you each month.

3) I have made some proposals to add some limits to peer review requests at Wikipedia_talk:Peer_review#Proposed_limits. The idea is to prevent any one user from overly burdening the process. These seem fairly reasonable (one PR request per editor per day, only four total PR requests per editor at a time, PR requests with cleanup banners can be delisted (like GAN quick fail), and wait two weeks to relist a PR request after it is archived), but have gotten no feedback in one week. If you have any thoughts on these, please weigh in.

Thanks again for your help and in advance for any assistance with the backlog. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 21:34, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

expertice opinion requested edit

Hello,

I noticed your name in the PR list.

Can you take a look at this talk page, Wikipedia talk:Peer review/Islamic Golden Age/archive1 please?

The article makes lots of claims that need to be assessed.

Thank you very much.

Cesar Tort 17:16, 25 October 2008 (UTC)Reply


Roses edit

 

Dear Temurjin,

On the occasion of the anniversary of the establishment of the Boghda Khaghanate of Mongolia you are presented these roses

Gantuya eng (talk) 12:45, 29 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Removal from PR Volunteer List edit

Due to inactivity in the project for more than six months, your name has been removed from the list at Wikipedia:Peer review/volunteers. If you decide to return to editing Wikipedia, feel free to readd your name to this list. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 20:07, 1 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Continuum edit

Сайн байна уу? Continuum гэдэг энэ математикийн ухагдахууныг монголоор юу гэдэг вэ? Би утгыг нь гадарлаж байгаа боловч яг оносон монгол нэр хэрэгтэй байна. Математикийн ихэнх нэр томъёо монголоор орчуулагдсан байдаг биз дээ? Тусламж хэрэгтэй байна. Gantuya eng (talk) 03:02, 25 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Континуум. Temur (talk) 01:45, 28 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Mongolian BLP edit

Would you be able to assess if this person is notable: Ichinnorov Manjaa? It has been BLP Prodded. I speak no Mongolian and Google Translate can't handle it, so I find it impossible to assess the sources; what little there is about her in English is snippets or 404. If the article is deleted before you see this and you'd like to see it I can let you see the text. Fences&Windows 20:20, 18 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

She is a famous fighter for justice in Mongolia, please do not delete, but improve the article. Gantuya eng (talk) 02:32, 19 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

You're invited! edit

Hello, Temurjin,

You are invited meet with your fellow Wikipedians by attending the Montréal meetup scheduled on Sunday, June 27, 2010; between 1500 - 1700 to be held at the Comité Social Centre Sud (CSCS), located at 1710 Beaudry, in Montréal. You can sign up at the meetup page.

The meetup is happening in concurrence with RoCoCo 2010, a free, bilingual, weekend unconference including many people involved with Wikis both within the Wikipedia/Wikimedia Community and abroad. You do not need to attend the conference to sign up for the Wikimeetup, but you are certainly welcome! Bastique ☎ call me!

(PS: Please share this with those you know who might not be on the delivery list, i.e. Users in Montreal/Quebec)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) 00:50, 8 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Feedback edit

Hi Temurjin, just to let you know, I have replied to your request for feedback at Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2011 May 25. Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:00, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

ESEAP Conference 2018 edit

 

Hello Temurjin,

I’m Irvin from PhilWiki Community, a member of the Communication Committee of the ESEAP Conference. ESEAP Conference 2018 is a regional conference for Wikimedia communities throughout the ESEAP region: ESEAP stands for East, Southeast Asia, and Pacific. Taking place in Bali, Indonesia on 5–6 May 2018, this is the first regional conference for these Wikimedia communities.

East and Southeast Asia and the Pacific are the most under-represented regions within the Wikimedia community. There is a significant number of Wikimedia contributors in our regions, yet we continue to struggle in establishing a well-managed community. This conference will bring participants from various ESEAP communities together in order to better understand the issues and to look for solutions. It also aims to connect people of the Wikimedia movement within ESEAP regions, to share ideas, and to build regional collaborations that are impossible to achieve through online communication.

We’ve got a lot of participation from several countries, but we’re lacking from your country. As we need more participants from your country, we believe that your contribution and participation would be a valuable asset to the success of this event. If you would like to participate in the conference, please do fill the form as soon as possible (by April 5, 2018) and we’ll inform you if you get selected for the conference.

Thank you and we hope to see you soon. --Filipinayzd 16:28, 29 March 2018 (UTC)