Templemane

Welcome!

Hello, Templemane, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Workshifting, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:49, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Workshifting

The article Workshifting has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced neologism. Scarcely even worthy of a redirect

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:49, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

How can I vet my article after deletion?

I've been having trouble figuring out how to add to/edit my article in the proper way so it wouldn't be deleted and now the page has been. I put in an updated version with additional references in a subpage under my username as suggested by the site, but I'm wary/confused as to how to continue to proceed to have my article resubmitted for approval since I can prove that it is not an unreferenced neologism. Please and thank you! Edit:// Thank you so much for your help! Everything has been listened to and I will try to implement all of the advice! Thank you!!// Templemane (talk) 17:37, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Ref. User:Templemane/Workshifting

Note, moved help request to end of page; please add new things at the end of talk pages.  Chzz  ►  17:56, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Hello! Putting it in userspace is a good idea (although in future it might be better to have a "sandbox" like User:Bob Castle/sandbox for making all off-wiki edits). Looking at your page, firstly I would recommend looking into how Wikipedia formats articles, which is outlined here. If all that's a bit too much to read through (it's a bit massive, to be honest), it would be worth looking into the way that established articles are formatted, such as the one on Telecommuting linked from your page. You'll notice that the references are not simply linked at the bottom but in the form of inline references. An outline of this is at Wikipedia:Citing sources. Hope that's some help. Let me know if you need any help. Bob talk 18:11, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Having said all that, I wonder whether the decision to delete may have been sensible. What I would recommend is perhaps trimming your article and then adding it as a paragraph to another relevant existing article, for example Location independence.Bob talk 18:15, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

I think it probably does fail the requirements for an article, as a neologism / dictionary definition, which lacks "signoficant coverage" in its own right (WP:GNG). It also looks like there is possibly a [[WP:COATRACK|hidden agenda, to promote the blog in the last para. I think the best answer is to add it to an existing article, with appropriate reliable sources - note, blogs are not reliable sources.

In answer to your specific question, usiong a {{helpme}} is one way to get a quick look at an article. You can also get feedback in WP:FEED, or use the articles for creation process.  Chzz  ►  18:34, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

How references work

Simple references These require two parts; a) Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref> He likes tea. <ref> [http://www.nicecupofteaandasitdown.com Tea website] </ref> b) A section called "References" with the special code "{{reflist}}"; == References == {{reflist}} (an existing article is likely to already have one of these sections) To see the result of that, please look at user:chzz/demo/simpleref. Edit it, and check the code; perhaps make a test page of your own, such as user:Templemane/reftest and try it out. Named references Chzz was born in 1837, <ref name="MyBook"> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref> in Footown.<ref name="MyBook"/> Note that the second usage has a / (and no closing ref tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result. Citation templates You can put anything you like between <ref> and </ref>, but using citation templates makes for a neat, consistent look; Chzz has 37 Olympic medals. <ref> {{Citation | last = Smith | first = John | title = Olympic medal winners of the 20th century | publication-date = 2001 | publisher = [[Cambridge University Press]] | page = 125 | isbn = 0-521-37169-4 }} </ref> Please see user:chzz/demo/citeref to see the result. For more help and tips on that subject, see user:chzz/help/refs.