User talk:Tehw1k1/2007-2008
Cocoto Carniival/ival edit
Hey man,
Thanks for the heads up. I wasn't sure about it myself, but the publisher (Neko Entertainment) has it on their page with two 'i's so I presume it's spelled that way. Pretty odd I must say. Thanks for your help with updating the List of Wii games and all. Digiwrld1 02:54, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
List of Wii games edit
Hey there Tehw1k1,
I've noted that you've contributed before to the List of Wii games. Just wanted to let you know that the list is getting ready for Featured status and is currently undergoing a Peer Review. If you can take a moment to look over the article and add your suggestions/comments for improvement here, it'd be much appreciated. Thanks! -Digiwrld1 21:55, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Digiwrld1, see my comment on your talk page. Hey Tehw1k1, I think it's best in my opinion if we put the List of Wii games by region. (ex: List of Wii games (North America) What are the odds of all 497 games going to be released worldwide. Anyways, I saw your comment on the discussion page on List of Wii games. If you can help me put all the games for North America that has a release date, that will be great! We should also create the List of Wii games for other regions as well. Please reply on my talk page about your thoughts. Thanks! Versus22 (talk) 19:55, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
History of video game consoles (sixth generation) edit
Hi Tehw1k1,
I saw you readded a changed version of the "sandbox" comment for GTA3 in the Sixth Generation article. I'm happy with the new version. Thanks! Sperril 17:18, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
RE: 7th gen edit
Tehw1k1,
With all due respect your list is a little ridiculous. What exactly qualifies something as a "franchise" in your mind? The vast majority of your list consists of notable (and some barely notable) releases, i.e. Death Jr., Mercury, Cooking Mama, Nanostray, etc., rather than long-running, established series. Why not change the heading to "Notable Releases"? It's impossible to identify franchises in the 7th generation anyway as we're right in the middle of it.
FYI- I created a page for the Victorious Boxers sequel. If you have some time, please feel free to add content. I'll add what I can from articles I can find on the web, but I'm planning on doing that little by little since I got a few other projects going on right, and actually still haven't finished playing the game yet :-p Anyway, any additions would be appreciated. Happy writing. (Guyinblack25 17:24, 4 May 2007 (UTC))
Highly Anticipated Games edit
You removed the "Highly anticipated games" row in the Home Consoles comparison section of History of video game consoles (seventh generation). I know that you know of the discussion section on the talk page, because you have posted there before. I would like to know you reasons for removing this row and why you believe it to be listcruft. It may be that I do not have a good understanding of the term, so I would appreciate it if you would explain your reasoning. Laptopdude 21:43, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
If you do not provide an explanation, I will add the row back into the chart. Laptopdude 21:44, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
See WP:Listcruft and WP:POV Also that you put like 3 Nintendo games against one 360 and one PS3 game could be seen as bias. The comparison chart also needs to be as streamlined as possible. The point of wikipedia articles is not to stuff them to the brim with all sorts of info, but to keep it to the most essential. Plus the anticipated games are already on the software list, which itself is borderline listcruft. If you still disagree you could bring it up on the article's talk page I suppose. Thanks. Tehw1k1 03:26, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
I did not add the three Wii games, and also had never even seen the software list. Because the titles are in the software list, I agree that this row is unnecessary. Laptopdude 21:52, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Ah OK I apologize for my assumption. Tehw1k1 04:48, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- No, that's OK, I probably would have thought the same thing. Anyway, between you and me, I have a hard time keeping my bias for the Wii in my head and out of the articles ; ) Laptopdude 20:17, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Re: date tags edit
I know that, but thanks for the info. Just64helpin 23:10, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of High Voltage Software edit
I have nominated High Voltage Software, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/High Voltage Software. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mayalld (talk) 21:11, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Look back on section "List of Wii games on your talk page. Versus22 (talk) 19:59, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
As I looked at the talk page today: I noticed you posted a comment about removing some sections about a week ago. This is indeed the correct thing to do. The following columns need to go for sure: genre and exclusive. After that we can see how big it is, and figure out if we need to condense it more. In general: these game lists are in poor shape with all the columns they have. If I had more time now, I would remove the sections myself. RobJ1981 (talk) 07:11, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
History merge completed edit
Hi, Tehw1k1, I just wanted to let you know I merged the histories for Little King's Story as you requested at WP:RM. Regards, Parsecboy (talk) 02:53, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi Tehw1k1. Just want to let you know that there are specific procedures that must be followed (in order to comply with the GFDL license) when you merge a page. The instructions are at Help:Merging and moving pages#Performing the merger. An edit summary must clearly note where the content has been merged from, for proper attribution of who wrote it. I've taken care of the missing edit summaries on this one. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 03:30, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Ok thanks, I mistakenly forgot about the history merging. Tehw1k1 (talk) 04:01, 3 December 2008 (UTC)