TechyKyle

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

• Be Bold!
• Don't let grumpy users scare you off
• Meet other new users
• Learn from others
• Play nicely with others
• Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
• Tell us about you

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on [[User talk:{{{1}}}|my talk page]]. Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here!

Xiong Chiamiov

talk :: contact

23:25, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Academic Challenger 07:24, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Regarding the Kyle Greer article

Hello! I'm glad you are interested in contributing to Wikipedia. We welcome new articles about subjects of encyclopedic significance. The article you created, Kyle Greer, appears to be primarily about yourself, people you know, or your own ideas. As such it has been marked for deletion. If I've misunderstood the article, please go to the article and follow the instructions in the banner to respond.

For a quick overview of Wikipedia's policies, see the five pillars of Wikipedia. You can still create other articles about encyclopedic subjects. If you can't think of a subject, you can check the recent requests or improve an existing article.

-- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 08:54, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Stop, hammertime!

These quotes are straight from Wikipedia:Verifiability, which is an official and founding policy of Wikipedia.

1. Articles should contain only material that has been published by reputable sources. 2. Editors adding new material to an article should cite a reputable source, or it may be removed by any editor. 3. The obligation to provide a reputable source lies with the editors wishing to include the material, not on those seeking to remove it.

"Articles should rely on credible, third-party sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. For academic subjects, the sources should preferably be peer-reviewed. Sources should also be appropriate to the claims made: outlandish claims beg strong sources."

"The burden of evidence lies with the editors who have made an edit or wish an edit to remain. Editors should therefore provide references. If an article topic has no reputable, reliable, third-party sources, Wikipedia should not have an article on that topic."

We appreciate you trying to help Wikipedia, but you're contributions just don't fit. If you would like more information about why they don't click the "Help" link in the left navigation bar. Thanks! --mboverload@ 09:42, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

User pages

Please do not blank other user pages. Thanks -- Samir धर्म 10:02, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Or engage in personal attack on other users or keep recreating deleted material. Continue to do so and you maybe blocked from editing. --pgk^(talk) 10:09, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism of talk page

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --mboverload@ 10:18, 16 July 2006 (UTC)