Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

I am shutting down this user and will only use my main (and other) user, WellThisIsTheReaper.

Block Evasion

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

TechnoBladeSPX (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello. As I have looked back on my past mistakes, I have realised my many mistakes on Sockpuppetry. This is why I pledge (vow) to never repeat this mistake on abusively using multiple accounts. Apart from my other accounts, the account, WellThisIsTheReaper has been different, and I believe you can say the same. I will try to NEVER do this again. And, if I do, well any admin can block me without question, and I won't appeal. I will also try never to create a different account which in any way is a case of Sockpuppetry. I am incredibly sorry everyone for abusively using multiple accounts. Sorry. Please unblock me. I will never, EVER repeat this measly mistake. I would also like to point out that I have done 6 months (October 20th, 2020 - April 20th, 2021) without sockpuppetry and/or posting a single block evasion proccess message. Thank you for listening to me. I hope you unblock me. Thanks. TechnoBladeSPX (talk) 15:17, 20 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Accept reason:

All right, I am unblocking you per your appeal under the standard offer. Please keep in mind that you'll probably be under more scrutiny as someone who was formerly blocked for using multiple accounts, so I strongly recommend you keep out of trouble. GeneralNotability (talk) 01:13, 15 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Checkuser needed (AmandaNP in particular, since you CU-blocked a stack of their accounts): a) thoughts on an SO unblock here? b) mind double-checking that "no socking" claim to the extent you're able? GeneralNotability (talk) 19:24, 14 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
@GeneralNotability: Always fine with an SO unblock as long as you think everything is addressed. CU is coming back clear. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 00:30, 15 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
@GeneralNotability: I have just checked my talk page, and I wanted to say thank you, and yes, I will keep out of trouble. Also, as I said earlier above I would close the TechnoBladeSPX account, so can you unblock my WellThisIsTheReaper account, too? Thanks, and cheers. TechnoBladeSPX (talk) 20:34, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
TechnoBladeSPX, sure, I will unblock that one and reblock this one. GeneralNotability (talk) 23:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Darlin van der Werff for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Darlin van der Werff is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darlin van der Werff until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SportingFlyer T·C 17:29, 29 April 2021 (UTC)Reply