Techhistorians
This is Techhistorians's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Collibra (December 28)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Collibra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Collibra, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Techhistorians!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 16:35, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
|
Hey theroadislong I replied to you rejection in december 28 on your talk page but i didn’t get a response from you so far. Here i copy the response in the hope you would find it:
Hey, thanks for the quick feedback on the article. I am connected, not as employee, but as a student to the company that sponsors our research. I study data innovation, and I believe I did a fair job at making sure the page has independent sources. As a 'unicorn' Collibra as a company has become the subject of master class case material: e.g., Harvard Business School http://www.datawest.org/uploads/9/1/0/0/91005152/dw19_draft_agenda_12-02-2019.pdf. Wikipedia would benefit from having a central page with history and relations to its technical grounds which already have established Wikipedia pages. Students can then expand on the page with their own studies over the coming years. Could you help us publish this article with your editorial guidance?
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Techhistorians (talk • contribs) 17:31, 28 December 2019 (UTC) Techhistorians (talk) 17:19, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Collibra (April 7)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Collibra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Collibra, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your draft article, Draft:Collibra
editHello, Techhistorians. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Collibra".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:29, 7 October 2020 (UTC)