Hello, Tbbucs77, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! SwisterTwister talk 05:35, 4 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Disambiguation link notification for September 4 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bradley Sowell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Tackle
Desmond Wynn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Guard

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 4 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kendrick Adams edit

Hello, Tbbucs77. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Kendrick Adams, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Kendrick Adams to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, ZappaOMati 03:26, 29 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of D. J. Bryant edit

 

The article D. J. Bryant has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent refs.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:35, 29 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of D. J. Bryant for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article D. J. Bryant is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D. J. Bryant until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:16, 8 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Stop vandalizing Wikipedia edit

Nobody who does this [1] belongs in the Wikipedia community. Qworty (talk) 23:07, 9 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for November 15 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Panama national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Dixon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 15 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jabin Sambrano (American football) edit

Hello, Tbbucs77. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Jabin Sambrano (American football), for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Jabin Sambrano (American football) to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, YPNYPN 21:33, 19 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 16 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 Copa Centroamericana squads, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Dixon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 16 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Richard Clebert (American football) edit

 

The article Richard Clebert (American football) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced WP:BLP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William 02:26, 25 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your contributed article, Richard Clebert edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Richard Clebert. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Richard Clebert (American football). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Richard Clebert (American football) – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ...William 02:28, 25 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

January 2013 edit

  Do not remove Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles without addressing the issue, as you did with Andrew DePaola. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. -- Patchy1 23:15, 27 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Category:Tampa Bay Buccaneers players edit

Please stop removing that category. Thanks.--Yankees10 02:21, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Can you please not remove the category. The category is for everybody that played with the Bucs. Just because a player isn't on the team anymore doen'st mean the category is removed.--Yankees10 22:56, 6 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Again, for the third time, stop removing the category.--Yankees10 23:41, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Tbbucs, it is the consensus practice of WikiProject National Football League (WP:NFL) that all players who have ever played for a given NFL team shall be listed under the category for players of that NFL team. This practice is consistent with that for all college athletes, including football and basketball players (we don't delete categories for college players when they transfer or graduate), as well as all other professional sports with which I am familiar, including players who have ever played in MLB, the NBA, the NFL, the NHL, and the WNBA. This also applies to all non-American professional athlete team categories I have encountered as well. So, yeah, Yankees10 is right. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 00:28, 30 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Need for sourced footnotes edit

Greetings, Tbucs. I just reviewed one of your recent edits: [2]. Please consider that all facts added to the biographies of living persons should have a sourced footnote to support them per WP:BLP, WP:V and WP:RS. Rather than simply revert your edit, I thought I would let you know and give you the opportunity to fix it yourself. Regards, Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 22:53, 16 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

NFL bio footnotes edit

Tbbucs, I'm not going to revert it, but edits like this [3] really should be footnoted with a reliable source when the text is added per WP:BLP, WP:V and WP:RS. When someone goes in three or four years later to improve or clean up the article, those transactional articles about contract signings, etc., can be damned difficult to find. Regards, Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 23:48, 23 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Removing AfD template edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Jeremy Lewis (American football). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot  t • c »  23:13, 17 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 22 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2013 CONCACAF Gold Cup squads (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Richard Dixon
Panama national football team (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Richard Dixon

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 22 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nick Speller edit

 

The article Nick Speller has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article appears to fail WP:GNG. No evidence player meets WP:NGRIDIRON or WP:NCOLLATH

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hack (talk) 16:50, 28 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Mason Robinson (American football) edit

 

The article Mason Robinson (American football) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Gtwfan52 (talk) 05:10, 29 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Articles on new pro football players. edit

If you are going to create articles about Football players, you need to familiarize yourself with the notability standard for them. You will find it at WP:NGRIDIRON. Please note that football players who have not actually played yet in a regular or postseason game are not eligible for a Wikipedia article. Also note that all biographical articles must have at least one WP:RS reference. You cannot remove a BLPPROD until you have added one. Gtwfan52 (talk) 05:29, 29 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeremy Lewis (American football) edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jeremy Lewis (American football), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Armchair QB (talk) 14:32, 29 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Richard Clebert for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard Clebert is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Clebert until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gtwfan52 (talk) 02:42, 30 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

NFL bios edit

As Gtwfan52 said at 05:29, 29 July 2013 (UTC) above, you need to familiarize yourself with WP:NGRIDIRON before continuing to waste your time creating articles that are destined to be deleted. The policy is simple, if the player hasn't yet played in a regular season game, they are not notable enough to have an article created. If you have questions, please ask. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 19:52, 5 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

I've nominated many of the articles you're created for deletion. The discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marvin Booker -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 20:18, 5 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 6 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chris Denton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mount Union (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 6 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Chris Denton for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Denton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Denton until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Secret account 22:38, 6 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Mason Robinson for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mason Robinson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mason Robinson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 20:57, 8 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Desmond Wynn for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Desmond Wynn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desmond Wynn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 14:46, 10 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Branden Smith for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Branden Smith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Branden Smith until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 23:43, 27 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jerry Johnson (wide receiver) for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jerry Johnson (wide receiver) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerry Johnson (wide receiver) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 17:19, 2 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jace Daniels for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jace Daniels is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jace Daniels until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 19:37, 2 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jason Weaver (American football) for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jason Weaver (American football) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Weaver (American football) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 16:22, 27 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jheranie Boyd for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jheranie Boyd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jheranie Boyd until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 02:56, 11 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for December 13 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richard Clebert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Center (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 13 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Rashaan Melvin for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rashaan Melvin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rashaan Melvin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 00:20, 10 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Rashaan Melvin edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rashaan Melvin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. X96lee15 (talk) 00:48, 3 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Patrick Scales edit

Just out of curiosity, why did you re-create the article for Patrick Scales? There is nothing to suggest he meets the notability guidelines set forth for American football players. Moreover, there is nothing to suggest he's a lock to make the team. It's one thing if they do but, there is no guarantee especially in February. -- The Writer 2.0 Talk 03:39, 18 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Patrick Scales (American football) edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Patrick Scales (American football), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. The Writer 2.0 Talk 02:54, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 20 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Panama national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Estadio Nacional (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 20 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Patrick Scales (American football) edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Patrick Scales (American football), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. The Writer 2.0 Talk 20:11, 23 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

August 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to T. J. Fatinikun may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * [[Tampa Bay Buccaneers]] ({{NFL Year|2014}}}*
  • }}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:41, 29 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Rashaan Melvin (American football) edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rashaan Melvin (American football), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.wikigrain.org/?req=Rashaan+Melvin.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:44, 1 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Rashaan Melvin edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rashaan Melvin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:48, 16 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

T. J. Fatinikun edit

He is on the Predators Other League Exempt list.WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 02:32, 26 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

October 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Scott Solomon may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * [[Tampa Bay Buccaneers]] ({{NFL Year|2014}}}
  • }}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:28, 22 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Free agent edit

Free agent doesn't go there, the Status is for "Active, injured, etc.". It says roster status, you can't have a roster status if you're a free agent. Sry for being annoyingWikiOriginal-9 (talk) 00:49, 3 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Taylor Sloat edit

Has yet to be in a game, he didn't debut. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 03:19, 6 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 6 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jocquel Skinner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bethel University. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 6 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Free agent edit

I already messaged you, but the |status parameter is for stuff like "active, injured, suspended". You can put free agent on the currentteam. You can do whatever you want but it isn't necessary to add that. Thanks WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 23:24, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Willie Moseley edit

 

The article Willie Moseley has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NGRIDIRON. A Google search shows no reliable, independent sources that cover Moseley in depth

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 04:52, 23 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 9 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Panama national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingston. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 9 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 18 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 Tampa Bay Buccaneers season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WFLA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 18 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 30 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 Tampa Bay Buccaneers season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WFLA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 30 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Amir Murillo edit

 

The article Amir Murillo has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 22:26, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

November 2016 edit

  Hello. You recently removed a Biographies of Living Persons PROD and I wanted to let you know that it has been replaced. Please don't remove these Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles unless they contain at least one reliable source or were created before 18 March 2010. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider adding reliable sources to the article or commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 23:16, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Tbbucs77. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Quayvon Hicks edit

 

The article Quayvon Hicks has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 01:53, 22 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Tbbucs77. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Dalton Crossan edit

 

The article Dalton Crossan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NGridiron and I have my reservations on if it would meet WP:GNG there is some coverage regarding his undrafted free agent status, but nothing on his career from new hampshire and most of it looks like routine stuff.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Church Talk 04:51, 23 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Dalton Crossan for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dalton Crossan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dalton Crossan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Church Talk 19:32, 24 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 31 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Panama national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nacional (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 31 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Tbbucs77. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Seth Lobato for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Seth Lobato is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seth Lobato until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:54, 29 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Karl Schmitz for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karl Schmitz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karl Schmitz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eagles 24/7 (C) 15:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Courtland Clavette for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Courtland Clavette is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Courtland Clavette until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 15:58, 7 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Dominique Brown for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dominique Brown is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominique Brown until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 02:39, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply