Tbbooher~enwiki

Dr sears

Dr sears pulled his comments off the Juice Plus discussion page. I was debating whether to revert them back just to document the vandalism that the page has undergone. What do you think? I also like the template on your user page. Where did you get that? Rhode Island Red 04:24, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Dr sears is an enigma. First, I don't think he is the 'real' doctor sears from askdoctorsears.com. His claims were too outrageous and all the information he used was listed on the website, like a user was cutting and pasting. It did bring my attention to the website askdoctorsears.com which is a completely misleading 'appeal to authority' in the first place where 'he' (in the knowledge that NSA marketing types most likely wrote his site) blankets the site with his credentials then gives personal testimonals, that are by the way outrageous: "it cured cancer, myopia, etc". The interesting thing, is that no effort was expended to conceal the fact that NSA/Juice Plus+ wrote the website -- look at http://www.askdoctorsears.com/html/4/T040500.asp and see the corporate graphics integrated into the site. Not only that but Juice Plus+ ad banners everywhere. This makes me sad for the consumer out there is is trusting the credentials and not seeing the marketing links and money flow underneath the site.

As for the comments on the talk page, I don't really care. His contributions are not significant, in only that they testify to the ardor JP+ folks will fight to defend their product. I would too if I put down that kind of money and time into a supplement. So I would let him remove his comments, no use entering an edit war over that and they are in the Wikipedia archives anyway.

What is more interesting is his warning on your talk page. I have to mull that over what 'he' is trying to accomplish there. Clearly, this individual is not too intelligent if he is trying to appear unbias and leaving warnings. Maybe he doesn't know how non-anonymous Wikipedia is. Oh and BTW, Nick needs to learn about IP addresses (i.e. a hacker can't do anything with a ISP's ip-address), why doesn't he just sign up for an account? Tbbooher 01:14, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

I also had a hard time believing that this individual could be the real Dr. Sears, or a real Dr. of anything for that matter. I couldn’t agree more with your comments about Sears and his website…shameful!

I was leaning towards keeping the comments as an indication of what the next “Dr. Sears” to come along can expect if they post ridiculous promotional messages and resort to vandalism.

Dr sears threat also surprised me(OK, not really!). I’m not sure whether he was threatening to have NSA sue me or take me out in an assassination plot. And the other vandal’s desperate plea for IP anonymity was pretty amusing.

WikiProject Disambiguation Talk Request

This is a form message being sent to all WikiProject Disambiguation participants. I may have found your page based on your contributions or your link repair user box on your user page. If you are not a member, please consider including your name on the project page. I recently left a proposed banner idea on the WikiProject Disambiguation talk page and I would appreciate any input you could provide. Before it can be approved or denied, I would prefer a lot of feedback from multiple participants in the project. So if you have the time please join in the discussion to help improve the WikiProject. Keep up the good work in link repair and thanks for your time. Nehrams2020 23:20, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Juice Plus

Your insight is needed on the Juice Plus page. Rhode Island Red 16:48, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi Yanksox: I sure could use your voice of reason on the Juice Plus page. Julia Havey is acting up again. Please have a look at the Juice Plus discussion page if you get a chance. Thanks Rhode Island Red 00:36, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

TBbooher, as an exemplary NPOV editor who has contributed to the Juice Plus article and discussion, your input on an extremely frustrating issue would be most welcome. Please see the discussion on Adverse Effects [1] at the JP talk page and comment as you see fit.

Juice Plus RfC

Your input on the recently filed user conduct RfC against me[2] would be greatly appreciated. Rhode Island Red 17:15, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Seconded. Tbooher, if you have time, I too would very much like to see you participate. Please feel free to offer a statement, as Citizen Don did, or simply indicate which statements on the RfC that you agree with, by endorsing them (or do any combination of the above). Thanks, Elonka 22:00, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Your input on the RfC is appreciated. It seems that you may not have noticed that there is a section where you can endorse my response,[3] which would also be appreciated if you agree with it. Rhode Island Red 06:27, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Windorph

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Windorph, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Richard Pinch (talk) 17:42, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

RFC/User

Because you are an editor who has participated in previous discussions on the same topic (or a closely related one), I call your attention to discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Rhode Island Red.2. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 16:46, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link fixing one-day contest

I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:02, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Tbbooher. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Tbbooher~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

02:59, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

19:32, 22 April 2015 (UTC)