Taylormade2000

Your submission at Articles for creation: Northeastern University School of Journalism (April 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kpgjhpjm was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Northeastern University School of Journalism and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Northeastern University School of Journalism, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kpgjhpjm 02:46, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Taylormade2000! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Kpgjhpjm 02:46, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Northeastern University School of Journalism (April 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Northeastern University School of Journalism and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Northeastern University School of Journalism, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

nearlyevil665 18:05, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021

Hello, Taylormade2000, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. As per your statement here , please identify your old accounts as per the requirements of WP:MULTIPLE. If you need any assistance you can reach out to me for help or at the Teahouse. Thank you! nearlyevil665 20:14, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

That is a false accusation. Sorry if you misread my earlier statement. , Taylormade2000 (talk) 09:05, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Taylormade2000. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Northeastern University, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. nearlyevil665 09:58, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

nearlyevil665 I'm not sure what your problem is, but you agreed to leave me alone and go our separate ways. I expect you to stop harassing and making false accusations against me. As for conflicts of interest, I have never set foot on Northeastern University's campus let alone am getting paid by them. I created a page that did not and should exist (I thought that's the point of Wikipedia; didn't know that was a conflict of interest). All my edits are factual and sourced. While you've been harassing me, I've been patiently waiting a month for my first article to get approved due to "promotional tone" objections, which none of you actually provide examples of. Meanwhile, the lead in Harvard's wiki (as do numerous other university pages) brazenly calls it "among the most prestigious in the world." Where are your "promotional tone" red flags for that? Are you going to correct Harvard's page or keep harassing me? , Taylormade2000 (talk) 11:20, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi, this is a standard notice, not a warning, to let you know about Wikipedia's COI policies. You are free to ignore it if you have no COI. Also there is a huge backlog at AfC, so review might take longer than a month. Good luck! nearlyevil665 15:50, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Northeastern University School of Journalism has been accepted

Northeastern University School of Journalism, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

nearlyevil665 16:27, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Edit warring

Edit warring to get your way is not allowed on Wikipedia - please specifically see the three-revert rule under which you will be blocked if you revert again. You have been specifically told to use the article talk page, not to continue undoing edits without comment. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:10, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

I would also like to point out that the edit summary attacking User:Pi.1415926535 is way out of line. Please remain civil. nearlyevil665 19:57, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

• Taylormade2000, you have made four reverts in less than 24 hours at Northeastern University School of Journalism. Please undo your last revert and take your arguments for inclusion of the content to the corresponding article talk page to avoid a WP:3RR block.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:03, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
• Since writing the above another editor has removed the content and there is now a discussion on the article talk page. Please join in there instead of restoring the disputed content.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:05, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Northeastern_University_School_of_Journalism. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. You have been previously warned not to use personal insults against other editors: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northeastern_University_School_of_Journalism&diff=prev&oldid=1026690170'. This is a collaborative community and being confrontational and abrasive won't help drive anything forward, please read WP:CIV. ' nearlyevil665 06:31, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Inproper use of edit summaries

Hi, please bear in mind that edit summaries should reflect a brief explanation of the edits made to a page (See Wikipedia:ES). Edit summaries aren't a venue to discuss unrelated content-related disputes and to vent at other editors, especially when there is an active discussion on the article's talk page. Let me know if you have any questions! nearlyevil665 11:46, 4 June 2021 (UTC)