Image:Mewbreon.GIF listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mewbreon.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:04, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

November 2007 edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Veterinary medicine, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Veterinary medicine was changed by Taya540 (c) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2007-11-09T22:06:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 22:06, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Veterinary medicine. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Why Not A Duck 22:22, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Veterinary medicine, you will be blocked from editing. -- Why Not A Duck 22:25, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cat picture edit

The problem with the Cat article is that everyone and their mother wants to put a picture of their cat in that article, so in order to keep the photos down to a bare minimum, it's been long agreed-upon that only one photo per coat coloring would go in that section. Yes, I know that it's impossible to represent all variations of bicolor, or tortie/calico, or whatever with only one photo, but luckily for you Tortoiseshell cat happens to have a blurry dilute tortie pic, so I've replaced the bad photo with yours there. Regards, howcheng {chat} 04:36, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

File:Kyocera-Strobe.jpg missing description details edit

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 00:50, 13 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Kyocera-Strobe.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kyocera-Strobe.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:49, 15 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

The file File:Dilute tortoiseshell and white cat.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 25 March 2020 (UTC)Reply