User talk:Tawkerbot4/Oct06

Reverted my revert

Just in case you want to know, your bot reverted an edit of mine to some vandalism that I'd just reverted. --Karafias 01:40, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

--A new Wiki account. 12:28, 26 September 2006 (UTC)Hello mate.

edit to Category:Hypothetical dwarf planets

I was attempting to fix the category, which had excessive text description and no parenting. 132.205.44.134 23:34, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Category:Indiana Jones characters

Your recent edit to Category:Indiana Jones characters (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot4 15:40, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Hello. Apparently the bot isn't allowing me to remove the PROD tag from Category:Indiana Jones characters. I attempted to remove the PROD because I think it's a legitimate category and the deletion request should follow WP:CfD. Thanks. RJH (talk) 15:44, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Bug in algorhythm

I'm not sure how your programe works but this edit [1] revert a good faith anti vandilism edit from an IP. David D. (Talk) 19:44, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Thierry Henry's shit

Your bot keeps censoring a Luis Aragones quote in the Thierry Henry article which includes the word "shit". As a part of a quote, it belongs there.  sʟυмɢυм • т • c  22:16, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

And it has attributed misinformation by User:80.193.41.81 to me in a further revert. Sigh.  sʟυмɢυм • т • c  23:12, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Bots gone wild

Please see the edit history here. Tawkerbot4 and AntiVandalBot took turns reverting the same edit. However, they kept reverting to a version that itself had been vandalized; and every time a human editor fixed the error, they reverted again. --Russ (talk) 17:13, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Sharing violation (between the bots) - I've been looking at this... things seem to be stabalizing now... not sure what was going on yet -- Tawker 18:09, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

>:O

If your bot edits another one of my revisions, I'm going to kill your family

With love, -Jaspah

You do know that that's a threatban.... right... -- Tawker 18:18, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia introduction page

Can you build something into the bot so that it does not identify edits to the introduction page (and similar tutorial pages/project pages) as vandalism. The users are invited by the introduction to edit the page. Tawkerbot reverted one such posting today and, I fear, would have posted a warning message had the user page existed.

Thanks

LittleOldMe 17:20, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

It *should* ignore such edits... do you have a diff so I can ID? -- Tawker 18:15, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Here is the diff. LittleOldMe 18:24, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I think it's a red herring. I now see what the bot is doing. It is just restoring the introduction text (as the edit summary says). Apologies. LittleOldMe 18:29, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

More problems

it's happening again... [2]. --198.185.18.207 12:58, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Why has Tawkerbot4 been accusing AntiVandalBot of vandalism?

If you look at User Talk:AntiVandalBot#Your edit to George Allen (U.S. politician), you can see that it accused User:AntiVandalBot of vandalism.

Are the two bots fighting? Will (Talk - contribs) 19:43, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Yep, sharing conflict. Damnit, the bots just need to learn to share -- Tawker 23:19, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Are you able to whitelist changes by user? If so, that would solve the problem, wouldn't it? Will (Talk - contribs) 23:48, 18 October 2006 (UTC)